Skip to main content

From Tacit Knowledge to Organizational Knowledge for Successful KM

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning

Part of the book series: Annals of Information Systems ((AOIS,volume 4))

Abstract

Certain organizational characteristics as well as Knowledge Management (KM) initiative characteristics are needed in order to have successful KM. These characteristics may affect each step in the KM process differently. One of the most difficult and interesting steps in the process is moving from tacit knowledge to organizational knowledge. This step is the focus of this chapter. Propositions concerning the effects of organizational characteristics (innovation and collaborative culture) and KM initiative characteristics (top management support, formal KM staff, incentive program based on quality, and communication about KM) are presented, as well as implications for future research in KM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Mashari, M., and M. Zairi. 1999. BPR implementation process: an analysis of key success and failure factors. Business Process Management Journal 5: 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili, A., V. Page, and T. Wentling. 2003. Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management 7: 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, S. 2000. KM horror stories. Knowledge Management 3: 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.B., and M.J. Woodland. 1999. Managing knowledge wisely: A case study in organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Management Studies 8: 175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M., and A. Collins. 2001. In search of innovation. The CPA Journal 71: 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, S.C. 2006. KM critical success factors: a comparison of perceived importance versus implementation in Malaysian ICT companies. The Learning Organization 13: 230–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal 34: 555–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desouza, K.C. 2003. Barriers to effective use of knowledge management systems in software engineering. Communications of the ACM 46: 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devi, R.S., S.C. Chong, and B. Lin. 2007. Organizational culture and KM processes from the perspective of an institution of higher learning. International Journal of Management in Education 1: 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehie, I.C., and M. Madsen. 2005. Identifying critical issues in enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation. Computers in Industry 56: 545–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ein-Dor, P. 2006. Taxonomies of knowledge. In Encyclopedia of knowledge management, ed. D.G. Schwartz. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, L.A., and D.J. Johnson. 1984. Communication and innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review 9: 704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greengard, S. 1998a. Will your culture support KM? Workforce 77: 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greengard, S. 1998b. How to make KM a reality. Workforce 77: 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C.W., and K.G. Jones. 2005. Exploring secondary activities of the knowledge chain. Knowledge and Process Management 12: 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C.W., and K.G. Jones. 2006. Knowledge management strategy formation. In Encyclopedia of knowledge management, ed. D.G. Schwartz. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C.W., and K. Jones. 2007. Knowledge chain activity classes: impacts on competitiveness and the importance of technology support. International Journal of Knowledge Management 3: 26–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.J. 1993. Organizational communication structure. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.J. 1996. Information seeking: An organizational dilemma. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R.M. 2000. Knowledge exchange. Executive Excellence 17: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. 2005. Factors affecting state government information technology employee turnover intentions. The American Review of Public Administration 35: 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K., and J.S. Sorra. 1996. The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review 21: 1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.M., and S. Hong. 2002. An enterprise-wide knowledge management system infrastructure. Industrial Management & Data Systems 102: 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, Y. 2005. Integrating knowledge management technologies in organizational business processes: Getting real time enterprises to deliver real business performance. Journal of Knowledge Management 9: 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullich, J. 2001. Growing a knowledge management system. Knowledge Management 3: 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M., and B.S. Frey. 2000. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science 11: 538–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plessis, M.D. 2005. Drivers of knowledge management in the corporate environment. International Journal of Information Management 25: 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirke, B. 2001. Defining the value of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Review 4: 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichers, A.E., J.P. Wanous, and J.T. Austin. 1997. Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change. Academy of Management Executive 11: 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, B. 2001. What every business manager should know about knowledge management. Canadian Manager 26: 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. 2001. Leveraging knowledge at American Management Systems. Best Practice Measurement Strategies 1: 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R.K. 2001. The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage. Journal of Management 27: 777–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, D. 2001. Leveraging tacit organizational knowledge. Journal of Management Information Systems 17: 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umble, E.J., R.R. Haft, and M.M. Umble. 2003. Enterprise resource planning: implementation procedures and critical success factors. European Journal of Operational Research 146: 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K.Y. 2005. Critical success factors for implementing knowledge management in small and medium enterprises. Industrial Management & Data Systems 105: 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiku Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, K., Leonard, L.N.K. (2009). From Tacit Knowledge to Organizational Knowledge for Successful KM. In: King, W. (eds) Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. Annals of Information Systems, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics