Knowledge Management or the Management of Knowledge?

Part of the Annals of Information Systems book series (AOIS, volume 4)


Knowledge Management has become in the past few decades an important branch of the wider discipline of Information Systems. Its importance is based on the observation that we live in a knowledge society and that knowledge has become a crucial component of a competitive organization. This essay argues that knowledge is a mark of civilization and has been discussed, disputed and managed in most spheres of human activity for all of history. The management of knowledge has been and is associated with control and power. Hence knowledge has been and is manipulated to achieve objectives beyond the ideal of truth. There is a dark side to the management of knowledge as exemplified by censorship, spin and propaganda. A study and understanding of the management of knowledge is needed if we want the discipline of knowledge management to be more than an idealistic rhetoric.

Knowledge is Power (Sir Francis Bacon, 1597)

Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely (Lord Acton, 1949)


Intellectual Property Knowledge Management Tacit Knowledge Practical Knowledge Software Piracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Acton, Lord Dalberg-Acton, J.E.E. 1949. Essays on Freedom and Power, Boston: The Beacon Press, p. 364.Google Scholar
  2. Alavi, M., and D.E. Leidner. 2001. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly 25(1): 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alter, S. 2006. Goals and tactics on the dark side of knowledge management. Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, Vol. 7.Google Scholar
  4. Bacon, Sir Francis. 1597/2002. Religious meditations: Of heresies. In Francis Bacon: The major works, ed. Vickers. Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics.Google Scholar
  5. Baskerville, R.L., and A. Dulopovici. 2007. The ethics of knowledge transfers and conversions: Property or privacy rights? Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, Vol. 7.Google Scholar
  6. Bjorn-Andersen, N. 2007. The never ending story of IT impact on the organization: The case of the ambient organization. In Proceedings of the 30th information systems research seminar in Scandinavia, IRIS Conference, Tampere, Finland, eds. Tiainen, Hannakaisa Isomäki, Mikko Korpela, Anja Mursu, Pirkko Nykänen, Minna-Kristiina Paakki and Samuel Pekkola, pp. 10–19.Google Scholar
  7. Blackler, F. 1995. Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies 16(6): 1021–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bontis, N., N. Dragonetti, K. Jacobsen, and G. Roos. 1999. The Knowledge toolbox: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources. European Management Journal 17(4): 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryant, A. 2006. Knowledge management: The ethics of the agora or the mechanism of the market. Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, Vol. 7.Google Scholar
  10. Cherns, A. 1976. Principles of socio-technical design. Human Relations 2(9): 783–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choo, C.W. 1998. Information management for the intelligent organization: The art of scanning the environment. Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Cooke-Deegan,. 1994. Gene wars: Science, politics and the human genome. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  13. Cruver, B. 2003. Enron: Anatomy of Greed, London Arrows Books.Google Scholar
  14. Davenport, T.H., and L. Prusak. 1998. Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Galliers, R.D., and S. Newall. 2003. Back to the future: From knowledge management to the management of information and data. Information Systems and E-Business 1: 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guardian Newspaper. 14 October 2005, p. 11, UK.Google Scholar
  17. Halal, W.E. 1999. The infinite resource: Mastering the boundless power of knowledge. In 21st century economics, ed. W.E. Halal, and K.B. Taylor, 53–75. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Hill, P. 1971. Towards a new philosophy of management. London: Gower Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hofstede, G. 1979. Humanization of work: The role of values in the third industrial revolution. In The quality of working life in Western and Eastern Europe, ed. C.L. Cooper, and E. Mumford, 18–37. London: Associated Business Press.Google Scholar
  20. ISTAG. 2001. Scenarios for ambient intelligence, IST program. http://www.cordis.iu/ist/istag.htm.Google Scholar
  21. Land, F., Nolas, S-M, and Amjad, U, 2009. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management, chapter VIII in Jennex, M. (ed), Knowledge Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Hershey and New York: IGI Global, Information Science Reference, pp 109–118.Google Scholar
  22. Mason, R.O. 1986. Four ethical issues for the information age. MIS Quarterly 10(1): 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murray, F., and S. Stern. 2005. Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. Paper prepared for the NBER academic science and entrepreneurship conference.Google Scholar
  24. Nonaka, I., and H. Takeushi. 1995. The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Polanyi, M. 1967. The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  26. Raymond, E.S. 2000. The cathedral and the bazaar. Thyrsus Enterprises.Google Scholar
  27. Schwartz, D.G. 2006. Encyclopedia of knowledge management. Herschey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Senge, P.M. 1990. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  29. Sulston, J., and Ferry, G. 2002. The Common Thread: A Story of Science, Politics, Ehtics, and the Human Genome, Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tarpy, D.R. 2004. The honey bee dance language. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, F, 1911. Principles of Scientific Management, New York and London: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  32. Thompson, D. 2008. Counter knowledge: How we have surrendered to conspiracy theories, quack medicine, rouge science and fake history. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Wilson, T.D. 2002. The nonsense of ‘knowledge management’. Information Research 8(1): 144–183.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information Systems and Innovation Group, Department of ManagementLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations