Composition, 1900–2000

  • David Bartholomae


By 1900, composition as a university subject was already a century old. Writing instruction and the writing of regular “themes” were part of the university curriculum in the United States throughout the nineteenth century, with goals and methods perhaps best represented in Blair’s Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres (1783), Newman’s A Practical System of Rhetoric (1827), Parker’s Aids to English Composition (1844), Boyd’s Elements of Rhetoric and Literary Criticism (1844), and Quackenbos’s Advanced Course of Rhetoric and English Composition (1855). Composition courses, usually required, are among the most distinguishing features of the North American version of university education. They represent a distinctively democratic ideal, that writing belongs to everyone, and a contract between the institution and the public — a bargain that, over time, made English departments large and central to the American university and to the American idea of an undergraduate education.


Faculty Member American Literature African American Study English Department Democratic Ideal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Berman, Russell A. “Foreign Languages and Foreign Cultures.” ADFL Bulletin 33.2 (2002): 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. “Final Report of the MLA Committee on Professional Employment.” PMLA 113 (1998): 1154–77.Google Scholar
  3. Godzich, Wlad. The Culture of Literacy. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Holquist, Michael. “Why We Should Remember Philology.” ADFL Bulletin 33.2 (2002): 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kern, Richard. “Reconciling the Language-Literature Split through Literacy.” ADFL Bulletin 33.3 (2002): 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. “Report of the ADE Ad Hoc Committee on Staffing.” ADE Bulletin 122 (1999): 7–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bedford/St. Martin’s 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Bartholomae
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations