Skip to main content

Structural Gaps in Public Finance

  • Chapter
Strategic Public Finance

Abstract

A ‘structural gap’ in public finance refers to a scenario whereby public expenditure grows faster than revenues over the long term. In such a case, public finance becomes increasingly unsustainable. A structural gap does not necessarily mean that public expenditure is too high or that tax revenues are too low. All a gap indicates is that expenditure is greater than can be sustained by income over an extended period of time. The term ‘structural gap’ is therefore value-free and does not reflect a particular political philosophy, whether Libertarian, Neo-Liberal or Collectivist. Instead, it reflects the state of the public finances in objective accounting terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Artis, M. J. and Buti, M. (2000) ‘Close to Balance or in Surplus–A Policy Maker’s Guide to the Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact’ Journal of Common Market Studies vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 563–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassone, F. and Franco, D. (2000) ‘Public Investment, the Stability Pact and the Golden Rule’ Fiscal Studies vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 207–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, T. E. (editor) (1977) Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth (Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. and Wintrobe, R. (1975) ‘The Equilibrium Size of a Budget Maximising Bureau: A Note on Niskanen’s Theory of Bureaucracy’ Journal of Political Economy no. 83, pp 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunila, A., Buti, M. and Franco, D. (editors) (2001) The Stability and Growth Pact–The Architecture of Fiscal Policy in EMU (Basingstoke: Palgrave–now Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper and Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1967) Inside Bureacracy (Boston: Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P. (1991) Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1967) The New Industrial State (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, R. (1999) Globalization and the Welfare State (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (2003) Public Choice III (third edition) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, P. B. (2002) Tax Policy in the Global Economy: Selected Essays of Peggy B. Musgrave (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government (Chicago: Aldine Atherton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1975) ‘Bureaucrats and Politicians’ Journal of Law and Economics vol. 18, no. 4. pp. 617–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1991) ‘Introduction’ in Blais, A. and Dion, S. (editors) The Budget Maximising Bureaucrat: Appraisals and Evidence (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1994) Bureaucracy and Public Economics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, M. (2000) Planning and the Political Market: Public Choice and the Politics of Government Failure (London: The Athlone Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, R., Strauch, R. and von Hagen, J. (1998) Sustainability of Public Finances (London: Centre for Economic Policy Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1989) The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent Seeking (London: Kluwer Academic Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1993) Rent Seeking (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G., Seldon, A. and Brady, G. L. (2000) Government: Whose Obedient Servant? A Primer in Public Choice (London: Institute of Economic Affairs).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Stephen J. Bailey

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bailey, S.J. (2004). Structural Gaps in Public Finance. In: Strategic Public Finance. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-4394-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics