Abstract
A ‘structural gap’ in public finance refers to a scenario whereby public expenditure grows faster than revenues over the long term. In such a case, public finance becomes increasingly unsustainable. A structural gap does not necessarily mean that public expenditure is too high or that tax revenues are too low. All a gap indicates is that expenditure is greater than can be sustained by income over an extended period of time. The term ‘structural gap’ is therefore value-free and does not reflect a particular political philosophy, whether Libertarian, Neo-Liberal or Collectivist. Instead, it reflects the state of the public finances in objective accounting terms.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
Artis, M. J. and Buti, M. (2000) ‘Close to Balance or in Surplus–A Policy Maker’s Guide to the Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact’ Journal of Common Market Studies vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 563–91.
Balassone, F. and Franco, D. (2000) ‘Public Investment, the Stability Pact and the Golden Rule’ Fiscal Studies vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 207–29.
Borcherding, T. E. (editor) (1977) Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth (Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press).
Breton, A. and Wintrobe, R. (1975) ‘The Equilibrium Size of a Budget Maximising Bureau: A Note on Niskanen’s Theory of Bureaucracy’ Journal of Political Economy no. 83, pp 195–207.
Brunila, A., Buti, M. and Franco, D. (editors) (2001) The Stability and Growth Pact–The Architecture of Fiscal Policy in EMU (Basingstoke: Palgrave–now Palgrave Macmillan).
Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper and Row).
Downs, A. (1967) Inside Bureacracy (Boston: Little, Brown).
Dunleavy, P. (1991) Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
Galbraith, J. K. (1967) The New Industrial State (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).
Mishra, R. (1999) Globalization and the Welfare State (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Mueller, D. C. (2003) Public Choice III (third edition) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Musgrave, P. B. (2002) Tax Policy in the Global Economy: Selected Essays of Peggy B. Musgrave (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Niskanen, W. A. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government (Chicago: Aldine Atherton).
Niskanen, W. A. (1975) ‘Bureaucrats and Politicians’ Journal of Law and Economics vol. 18, no. 4. pp. 617–43.
Niskanen, W. A. (1991) ‘Introduction’ in Blais, A. and Dion, S. (editors) The Budget Maximising Bureaucrat: Appraisals and Evidence (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
Niskanen, W. A. (1994) Bureaucracy and Public Economics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Olson, M. (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
Pennington, M. (2000) Planning and the Political Market: Public Choice and the Politics of Government Failure (London: The Athlone Press).
Perotti, R., Strauch, R. and von Hagen, J. (1998) Sustainability of Public Finances (London: Centre for Economic Policy Research).
Tullock, G. (1989) The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent Seeking (London: Kluwer Academic Press).
Tullock, G. (1993) Rent Seeking (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Tullock, G., Seldon, A. and Brady, G. L. (2000) Government: Whose Obedient Servant? A Primer in Public Choice (London: Institute of Economic Affairs).
Copyright information
© 2004 Stephen J. Bailey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bailey, S.J. (2004). Structural Gaps in Public Finance. In: Strategic Public Finance. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-4394-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-4394-1_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-92221-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-4394-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)