Advertisement

Let’s get together: teams at work

  • Owen Hargie
  • David Dickson
  • Dennis Tourish

Abstract

A team is a number of interdependent people bound together by a collective aim.1 They may have a finite start and end date, or be intended as an indefinite part of an organisation’s structure.2 An essential feature of teams is that the members co-operate to achieve jointly agreed goals. They hold each other mutually accountable for success or failure. The underlying philosophy is that if one of them looks good, they all look good. Teams celebrate both personal and group achievements. In doing so, performance objectives are routinely exceeded. What was once considered impossible becomes viewed as inevitable. Given this, some leading researchers have argued that teams should be the standard unit of performance for most organisations, regardless of size.3 Indeed, the research literature identifies a number of consistent benefits from team organisation. These include4,5
  • Improved quality of work life for employees

  • Enhanced work satisfaction

  • Heightened levels of worker identification and commitment

  • Enhanced flexibility

  • Increased productivity

  • Improvements to products and services

  • Reduced staff turnover

Keywords

Team Member Communication Skill Effective Management Team Meeting Virtual Team 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zaiger Roberts, V. (1994) ‘The organization of work: contributions from open systems theory’, in A. Obholzer and V. Zaiger Roberts (eds) The Unconscious at Work, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Orsburn, J. and Moran, L. (2000) The New Self-Directed Work teams: Mastering the Challenge, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Katzenbach, J. and Smith, D. (1993) The Wisdom of Teams, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glassop, L. (2002) ‘The organizational benefits of teams’, Human Relations, 55: 225–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bacon, N. and Blyton, P. (2000) ‘High road and low road teamworking: perceptions of management rationalises and organizational and human resource outcomes’, Human Relations, 53: 1425–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ashmos, D. and Nathan, M. (2002) ‘Team sense-making: a mental model for navigating uncharted territories’, Journal of Managerial Issues, 14: 198–217.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knights, D. and McCabe, D. (2000) ‘Bewitched, bothered and bewildered: the meaning and experience of teamworking for employees in an automobile company’, Human Relations, 53: 1481–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sprigg, C., Jackson, P. and Parker, S. (2000) ‘Production teamworking: the importance of interdependence and autonomy for employee strain and satisfaction’, Human Relations, 53: 1519–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glassop, L. (2002) op. cit.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mueller, F., Proctor, S. and Buchanan, D. (2000) ‘Teamworking in its context(s): antecedents, nature and dimensions’, Human Relations, 53: 1387–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tourish, D. (1997) ‘Transforming internal corporate communications: the power of symbolic gestures and barriers to change’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 2: 109–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reichfield, F. (2001) Loyalty Rules: How Today’s Leaders Build Lasting Relationships, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fukuyama, F. (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D’Aprix, R. (1996) Communicating for Change, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tourish, D. and Hargie, O. (2004) ‘The communication consequences of downsizing trust, loyalty and commitment’, in D. Tourish and O. Hargie (eds) Key Issues in Organisational Communication, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pfeffer, J. (1998) The Human Equation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Banker, R., Field, J., Schroeder, R. and Sinha, K. (1996) ‘Impact of work teams on manufacturing performance: a longitudinal field study’, Academy of Management Journal, 39: 867–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pfeffer (1998) op. cit.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kanter, R. (1983) The Change Masters: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the American Corporation, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parker, G. (1990) Team Players and Teamwork: The New Competitive Business Strategy, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kharbana, O. and Stallworthy, E. (1990) Project Teams: The Human Factor, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arnott, M. (1987) ‘Effective employee communication’, in N. Hart (ed.) Effective Corporate Relations, London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pappa, M. and Tracy, K. (1988) ‘Communication indices of employee performance with new technology’, Communication Research, 15: 524–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kirkman, B., Rosen, B., Gibson, C., Tesluk, P. and McPherson, S. (2002) ‘Five challenges to virtual team success: lessons from Sabre, Inc.’, Academy of Management Executive, 16: 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elkins, T. (2000) ‘Virtual teams: connect and collaborate’, IIE Solutions, 32: 26–32.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lipnack, J. and Stamps, J. (2000) Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries With Technology, 2nd edition, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morris, S. and Johnson McManus, D. (2002) ‘Information infrastructure: centrality in the agile organization’, Information Systems Management, 19: 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kirkman et al., op. cit.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hackman, J. (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances, Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kirkman et al., op. cit.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Coles, M. (1997) ‘Firm plays it by ear’, Sunday Times, 19 October, p. 28.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tuckman, B. and Jensen, M. (1977) ‘Stages of small group development revisited’, Group and Organization Studies, 2: 419–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alper, S., Tjosvold, D. and Law, K. (2000) ‘Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in organizational teams’, Personnel Psychology, 53: 625–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brown, K., Klastorin, T. and Valuzzi, J. (1990) ‘Project performance and the liability of group harmony’, IEEE Trans Eng Management, 37: 117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Peters, T. and Austin, N. (1985) A Passion for Excellence, Glasgow: Collins. 35. Katzenbach and Smith, op. cit.Google Scholar
  35. 36.
    Hayes, N. (1997) Successful Team Management, London: Thomson Business Press.Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    Hackman, J. (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  37. 38.
    Hackman, ibid., p. 41.Google Scholar
  38. 39.
    Cited by Hackman, ibid., p. 63.Google Scholar
  39. 40.
    Hackman, ibid., pp. 116–22.Google Scholar
  40. 41.
    Meyer, C. (1994) ‘How the right measures help teams excel’, Harvard Business Review, May: 95–103.Google Scholar
  41. 42.
    Quoted in Evans, R. (1997) ‘Hollow the leader’, Report on Business Magazine, November, p. 60.Google Scholar
  42. 43.
    Hargie, O. and Dickson, D. (2004) Skilled Interpersonal Communication: Research, Theory and Practice, 4th edition, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. 44.
    ‘Boss buys workers free drinks’, Newsletter, 30 April 1998, p. 13.Google Scholar
  44. 45.
    O’Reilly, C. and Pfeffer, J. (2000) Hidden Value: How Great Companies Achieve Extraordinary Results with Ordinary People, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  45. 46.
    Adapted from Whetten, D. and Cameron, K. (2001) Developing Management Skills, 5th Edition, New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  46. 47.
    Brown, R. (2000) Group Processes, 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. 48.
    Janis, I. (1982) Groupthink, 2nd edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  48. 49.
    Tourish, D. and Wohlforth, T. (2000) On the Edge: Political Cults, Right and Left, New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  49. 50.
    Steiner, I. (1972) Group Process and Productivity, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  50. 51.
    Discussed in Brown (2000) op. cit., pp. 173–4.Google Scholar
  51. 52.
    Ingham, A., Levinger, G., Graves, J. and Peckham, V. (1974) ‘The Ringlemann effect: studies of group size and group performance’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10: 371–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 53.
    Hambrick, D. (1995) ‘Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams’, California Management Review, 37: 110–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 54.
    Katzenbach, J. (1997) ‘The myth of the top management team’, Harvard Business Review, 75: 83–91.Google Scholar
  54. 55.
    Parker, S., Wall, T. and Jackson, P. (1997) ‘“That’s not my job”: developing flexible employee work orientations’, Academy of Management Journal, 40: 899–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 56.
    Yeatts, D. and Hyten, C. (1998) High Performing Self Managed Work Teams, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 57.
    Kirkman, B. and Rosen, B. (2000) ‘Powering up teams’, Organizational Dynamics, Winter: 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 58.
    Sinclair, A. (1992) ‘The tyranny of a team ideology’, Organization Studies, 13: 611–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 59.
    Geary, J. and Dobbins, A. (2001) ‘Teamworking: a new dynamic in the pursuit of management control’, Human Resource Management Journal, 11: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Owen Hargie, David Dickson and Dennis Tourish 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Owen Hargie
  • David Dickson
  • Dennis Tourish

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations