Advertisement

‘Rescuing the Poor Stockinger’: History from Below

  • Matt Perry
Part of the Theory and History book series (THHI)

Abstract

Previously Marxist historians had been neither academics nor professional historians; they were revolutionaries with a range of interests which included history. After the Second World War, this was to change. In this period a generation of academic Marxists emerged and matured. Their research was, as a result, more systematically and exclusively oriented towards historical questions. The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 provoked the departure of several historians from the Communist Party who had thrived despite the generally stultifying influence of Stalinism. As a consequence, they attempted to shake off the mechanical materialism of Cominform orthodoxy. They squinted at Marx and history with rejuvenated eyes. The result, history from below, ennobled the resistance and non-conformity of bandits, peasants, artisans, industrial workers, poachers, religious millenarians and transportees. E.P. Thompson’s The Making of the English Working Class (1963) acted as a manifesto for this perspective. But the groundwork had been prepared well before this in the Historians’ Group of the Communist Party of Great Britain.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    C.L.R. James, The Black Jacobins (1980; 1st edn 1938) p. ix.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Morris, ‘The Lord Mayor’s Show’, first appearing in Justice, 1 (44) (15 November 1884); reprinted in William Morris, Political Writings: Contributions to Justice and Commonweal (Bristol, 1994 ), p. 66.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Hobsbawm, ‘Communist Party Historians’ Group 1946–56’, in M. Cornforth (ed.), Rebels and Their Causes: Essays in Honour of A.L. Morton (1978), p. 26.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    H. Butterfield, The Whig Interpretation of History (1931);Google Scholar
  5. L. Namier, The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III (1929).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A school of economic history named after Sir J.H. Clapham, the British economic historian (1873–1946). See J. Clapham, A Concise Economic History of Britain from the Earliest Times to 1760 (Cambridge, 1949);Google Scholar
  7. J. Clapham, An Economic History of Modern Britain (Cambridge, 1930 ).Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    P. Fryer, Hungarian Tragedy, (1956);Google Scholar
  9. P. Fryer, Staying Power: Black People in Britain since 1504 (New Jersey, 1984);Google Scholar
  10. P. Fryer, Black People and the British Empire (1988).Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    J. Morrill, The Nature of the English Revolution (1993), p. 273.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    C. Hill, The Collected Essays of Christopher Hill. Volume 3: People and Ideas in 17th-Century England (Brighton, 1986 ) p. 97.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    C. Hill, England’s Turning Point: Essays on Seventeenth-Century English History (1998), pp. 294–5.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    C. Hill, The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution (1972), pp. 292–3.Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    C. Hill, The Intellectual Origins of the Revolution (Oxford, 1965). This proved to be a controversial work which prompted a debate over the relationship between Puritanism and science.Google Scholar
  16. See C. Webster (ed.), The Intellectual Revolution of the Seventeenth Century (1974).Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    C. Hill, The Intellectual Consequences of the English Revolution (Wisconsin, 1980 ), p. 60.Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    C. Hill, The English Revolution 1640 (1979; 1st edn 1940), p. 62.Google Scholar
  19. 22.
    J.H. Hexter, On Historians (1979), pp. 227–54.Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    C. Hill, The Collected Essays of Christopher Hill. Volume 2: Religion and Politics in Seventeenth-Century England (Amherst, MA, 1986), p. 51; England’s Turning Point, p. 294.Google Scholar
  21. 24.
    E.P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (Harmondsworth, 1968; 1st edn 1963), p. 13.Google Scholar
  22. H. Kaye, Why Do Ruling Classes Fear History? And Other Questions (London, 1997; 1st edn 1995), p. 205.Google Scholar
  23. 29.
    Though he would object to much of the poststructuralist content of J.W. Scott, ‘Women and the Making of the English Working Class’, in J.W. Scott (ed.), Gender and the Politics of History (New York, 1988)Google Scholar
  24. for a critique of Scott’s views see B.D. Palmer, Descent into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History (Philadelphia, PA, 1990), pp. 78–86 and 172–86.Google Scholar
  25. 30.
    E.P. Thompson, Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act (1990; 1st edn 1975), p. 262. Thompson (and Linebaugh) underscored the importance of capital punishment through the term ‘thanatocracy’, meaning a government that relies heavily for its power on the use of the death penalty.Google Scholar
  26. 32.
    E.P. Thompson, Customs in Common (1993; 1st edn 1991), p. 7.Google Scholar
  27. 33.
    P. Linebaugh, The London Hanged: Crime and Civil Society in the Eighteenth Century (1985), p. xvii.Google Scholar
  28. 35.
    H. Gutman, The Black Family in Slavery and Freedom 1750–1925 (Oxford, 1976), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
  29. 36.
    E. Genovese, Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made (New York, 1975 ), pp. 25–6.Google Scholar
  30. 39.
    D. Chakrabarty, Rethinking Working Class History: Bengal 1890–1940 ( Princeton, NJ, 1989 ), p. 69.Google Scholar
  31. 40.
    E. Said, Orientalism (1985);Google Scholar
  32. S. Sarkar, ‘Orientalism revisited: Saidian frameworks and the writing of modern Indian history’, Oxford Literary Review, 16 (1–2) (1994).Google Scholar
  33. 41.
    Though others have also taken the Thompsonian route to postmodernism as well see M. Steinberg, ‘Culturally speaking: finding a commons between post-structuralism and the Thompsonian perspective’, Social History, 21 (2) (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Matt Perry 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matt Perry

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations