Skip to main content

Defining Standards for the 21st Century

  • Chapter
Educational Assessment in the 21st Century

Most countries around the world have entered the 21st century with increased focus on and requirements for educational accountability, expressed through a variety of assessment regimes and policies. Common to these directions is talk about ‘standards’ in education. For example, there is talk about setting standards (preferring high standards and eschewing low standards), monitoring standards (emphasising school and teacher accountability), raising standards (improving educational outcomes) and reporting on standards (saying how well students are progressing in school). Talk about standards pervades current discussions about education, particularly, for the focus of this book, discussions that involve educational assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldrich, R. (2000).Educational standards in historical perspective, Proceedings of the British Academy, 102, 9–37. London: The British Academy. (Also in Goldstein & Heath, 2000). Retrieved June 19, 2008 from <http://www.proc.britac.ac.uk/cgi-bin/somsid.cgi?page=volumes/pba102&session=770884A>.

  • Baird, J., Cresswell, M. & Newton, P. (2000). Would the real gold standard please step forward? Research Papers in Education, 15 (2), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrs, M., Ellis, S., Hester, H. & Thomas, A. (1988), The primary language record handbook for teachers. London: Centre for Literacy in Primary Education. Retrieved June 19, 2008 from <http://www.clpe.co.uk/researchandprojects/research_06.html>.

  • Bennett, J. (1998). Setting standards and applying them across different administrations of large-scale, high-stakes, curriculum-based public examinations. Sydney: New South Wales Board of Studies. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from <www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/archives/occasional_papers/occasionalp1_assess.htm>.

  • Bereiter, C. & Scardamalier, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An enquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000a). How experts differ from novices. In How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school (pp. 31–50). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000b). Mind and brain. In How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school (pp. 114–127). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1966). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning, Teachers College Record, 64 (8), 723–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll model: A twenty-five year retrospective and prospective view, Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Miller, S. (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory and practice in cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cizek, G. J. (Ed.) (2001). Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K. (1996). Standards-based school reform: Policy, practice, and performance. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 99–127). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2005). Schools Assistance (Learning Together—Achievement Through Choice and Opportunity) Regulations 2005. Canberra: Federal Register of Legislative Instruments. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from <http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/profiles/Schools_Assistance_Regulations_2005.htm>.

  • Costa, A. L. (Ed.) (2001). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd ed.). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2000). Habits of mind: A developmental series. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahllöf, U. (1971). Ability grouping, content and process analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. (Ed.) (1993). Charting the agenda: Educational activity after Vygotsky. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist (special issue: psychological science and education), 41(10), 1040–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, B. (1998). Supporting diverse learners with the Primary Language Record. In D. Allen (Ed.), Assessing student learning: From grading to understanding. New York and London: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, C. E., Julian, L., & Petrilli, M. J. (2006). The state of state standards. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from <http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/StateofStateStandards2006.pdf>.

  • Goldstein, H. & Heath, A. (Eds.). (2000). Educational standards: Proceedings of the British Academy 102. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Also available at <http://www.proc. britac.ac.uk/cgi-bin/somsid.cgi?page=volumes/pba102&session=770884A> retrieved June 19, 2008.

  • Green, S. (2002). Criterion referenced assessment as a guide to learning: The importance of progression and reliability. A paper presented at the Association for the Study of Evaluation in Education in South Africa International Conference, Johannesburg. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from <http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/ca/digitalAssets/113775_Criterion_Referenced_Assessment_as_a_Guide_to_Learning._The_.pdf<.

  • Grubb, W. N., & Oakes, J. (2007). Restoring Value to the high school: the rhetoric and practice of higher standards. Tempe, Arizona: Education Policy Research Unit & Education Policy Research Unit. Retrieved 9 June, 2008, from <http://epsl.asu.edu/epru/documents/EPSL-0710-242-EPRU.pdf>.

  • Hall, K., & Harding, A. (2002). Level descriptions and teacher assessments in England: Towards a community of practice, Education Research, 44(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. W., & Crévola, C. A. (1999). The role of standards in educational reform for the 21st century. In D. D. Marsh (Ed.), ASCD Yearbook 1999: Preparing our schools for the 21st century (pp. 117–142) Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, A., & Spours, K. (2005). The learner experience of Curriculum 2000: Implications for the reform of 14–19 education in England, Journal of Education Policy, 20(1), 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the brain in mind (2nd ed.). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallos, D., & Lundgren, U. P. (1979). Curriculum as a pedagogical problem. Lund: LiberLäromedel/Gleerup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keamy, R. K., Nicholas, H., Mahar, S., & Herrick, C. (2007). Personalising education: From research to policy and practice. Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from <http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/publ/research/publ/personalising-education-report.pdf>.

  • Lundgren, U. P. (1972). Frame factors and the teaching process. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G. S. (2001). Moderation of assessments in vocational education and training. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Employment and Training. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from <http://www.trainandemploy.qld.gov.au/resources/about_us/pdf/moderation_report.pdf>.

  • Maxwell, G. S. (2002a). Are core learning outcomes standards? Brisbane: Queensland Studies Authority (now Queensland Studies Authority). Retrieved June 10, 2008, from <http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/publications/research_qscc_assess_report_1.pdf>.

  • Maxwell, G. S. (2002b). Moderation of teacher judgments in student assessment. Brisbane: Queensland School Curriculum Council (now Queensland Studies Authority). Retrieved June 24, 2008, from <http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/publications/research_qscc_assess_report_2.pdf>.

  • McCandliss, B. (2002). Brain-based education in Encyclopedia of Education. Farmington Hills, Michigan: The Gale Group. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from <http://www.answers.com/topic/brain-based-education>.

  • National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, Virginia: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from <http://www.nap.edu/html/nses/>.

  • New Standards (1997). New standards performance standards: Elementary, middle school and high school. Rochester. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, C. & Bahr, N. (2000). Knowledge structures and motivation to learn: Reciprocal effects. Queensland Journal of Educational Research, 16 (1), 76–106. Interaction of knowledge and motivation. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from <www.iier.org.au/qjer/qjer16/ng.html>.

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2006). Personalising education. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2007). Understanding the brain: The birth of a learning science. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelligrino, J. W., Chudowski, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B. (1996). Standards as incentives for instructional reform. In S. H. Furhman & J. O’Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Studies Authority (QSA) (2007). Years 3, 5, and 7 Literacy: Writing. In 2007 Test Reporting Handbook for the Queensland Years 3, 5 and 7 Literacy and Numeracy Tests (pp. 15–24). Brisbane: QSA. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from <http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/assessment/3579_handbook_reporting_07.pdf>.

  • Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards, Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems, Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, M., & Sizmur, S. (1998). Level descriptions in the National Curriculum: What kind of criterion referencing is this? Oxford Review of Education, 24(2), 181–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholz, J. H., Ogawa, R. T., & Scribner, S. P. (2004). The standards gap. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1177–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. (1984). Enhancing self-efficacy and achievement through rewards and goals: Motivational and informational effects. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture, Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L. (Eds.). (1989). Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stites, R. (1999). A user’s guide to standards-based educational reform: From theory to practice, Focus on basics: Connecting research and practice, vol. 3, issue C. Retrieved from <http://www.ncsall.net/?id=352>.

  • Wiggins, G. (1991). Standards not standardisation: Evoking quality student work, Educational Leadership, 48(5), 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, S., & Kissane, B. (1997). Achieving outcome-based education: Premises, principles and implications for curriculum and assessment. Deakin, ACT: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. R., & Bertenthal, M. W. (Eds.). (2001). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A. (2000). A comparative perspective on educational standards. Proceedings of the British Academy, 102, 9–37. London: The British Academy. (Also in Goldstein & Heath, 2000). Retrieved June 19, 2008, from <http://www.proc.britac.ac.uk/cgi-bin/somsid.cgi?page=volumes/pba102&session=770884A>.

  • Wolf, P. (2001). Brain matters: Translating research into classroom practice. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, E., & Ingram, D. E. (1999). International Second Language Proficiency Ratings (ISLPR): General proficiency version for English. Brisbane: Centre for Applied Linguistics and Languages, Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham Samuel Maxwell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maxwell, G.S. (2009). Defining Standards for the 21st Century. In: Wyatt-Smith, C., Cumming, J.J. (eds) Educational Assessment in the 21st Century. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics