Skip to main content

Framing Assessment Today for the Future: Issues and Challenges

  • Chapter

Assessment—and its interface with curriculum, teaching and learning—has always been a significant component of classroom practice. Research has indicated that typical teachers spend between one-third and one-half of their class time engaged in one or another type of assessment or learning evaluation activity (Stiggins & Conklin, 1992). However, research has also expressed concern that the knowledge that teachers hold about assessment matters has been limited, with scant attention paid to this area in teacher-preparation programs (Christie et al., 1991; Louden et al., 2005; Matters, 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beach, R., Green, J. L., Kamil, M. L., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (1991). Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F., Devlin, B., Freebody, P., Luke, A., Martin, J. R., Threadgold, T. et al. (1991). Teaching English literacy: A project of national significance on the preservice preparation of teachers for teaching English literacy—Volume 1. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, J. J., & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (Eds.). (2001). Literacy-curriculum connections: Implications for theory and practice. Melbourne: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, A. R. (1998). Assessment of complex performances: Limitations of key measurement assumptions. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of complementary methods in education research. Mahwah, NJ: LEA (for AERA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning—tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellis, M., & Silvernail, D. (2002). Considering the place of teacher judgment in Maine’s local assessment systems. Maine: Center for Educational Policy, Applied Research, and Evaluation, University of Southern Maine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden, W., Rohl, M., Gore, J., McIntosh, A., Greaves, D., Wright, R. et al. (2005). Prepared to teach: An investigation into the preparation of teachers to teach literacy and numeracy. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matters, G. (2006). Assessment approaches in Queensland senior science syllabuses. A report to the Queensland Studies Authority. Brisbane: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps v Hillingdon London Borough Council [2001] 2 AC 619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J., & Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teachers’ hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Joy Cumming .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cumming, J.J., Wyatt-Smith, C. (2009). Framing Assessment Today for the Future: Issues and Challenges. In: Wyatt-Smith, C., Cumming, J.J. (eds) Educational Assessment in the 21st Century. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics