Sustainable ‘Green’ Rural Municipalities

  • Ofira Ayalon
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)


The chapter suggests several ways to reduce carbon emissions from rural communities. Both the waste and the energy sectors are significant producers of greenhouse gases (GHG), but with proper management it is possible not only to reduce the amount of GHG, but also to obtain other ancillary benefits. In the field of sustainable waste management, both the city and the agricultural sector gain from cooperation in which the agricultural sector serves as the recipient of an increasing volume of the rich organic waste produced in the city. This means of waste management is significant for countries characterised by high organic content of the waste, poor organic content of agricultural land, and generally inferior waste-management practices. According to this method, each ton of waste reduces 0.25 t of CO2 equivalents by avoiding methane emission at landfill sites, and furthermore, the addition of compost to agriculture soils can increase yields: the production of 1 t of dry vegetative matter leads to the sequestration of 2 t of CO2. Another means to reduce carbon emission is by increasing energy efficiency in the community. Several alternative measures are presented in the chapter, including advanced solar technologies. In addition to carbon emission reduction, the suggested alternatives can reduce air pollution and energy expenditures.


Israel rural communities waste management energy conservation renewable energy solar thermal technologies photovoltaic technologies carbon emissions 


  1. Avnimelech, Y. (1997). Land application of composted municipal wastes. In: Chremisinoff, P. N. (ed.) Ecological issues & environmental impact assessment: advances in environmental control technology, pp. 551–570. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  2. Ayalon, O., Avnimelech, Y. (2007). The role of an academic institute in setting national environmental policy: the case of Israel. Energy, 32: 927–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayalon O., Avnimelech Y., Shechter, M. (2000a). Alternative MSW treatment options to reduce global greenhouse gases emissions – the Israeli example. Waste Management & Research, 18: 538–544.Google Scholar
  4. Ayalon, O., Avnimelech, Y., Shechter, M. (2000b) The city and the agricultural sector inter-relationship: environmental costs and benefits. In: Brebbia, C. A., Ferrante, A., Rodriguez, M., Terra, B. (eds.) The sustainable city, urban regeneration and sustainability, pp. 85–93. Southampton/Boston, MA: WIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ayalon, O., Avnimelech, Y., Shechter, M. (2001).Solid waste treatment as a high-priority and low-cost alternative for greenhouse gas mitigation. Environmental Management, 27(5): 697–704.Google Scholar
  6. EC (2005). A vision for photovoltaic technology. EC research report, Directorate-General for research. . Accessed 28 July 2008.
  7. Eshet, T., Ayalon, O., Shechter, M. (2006). Valuation of externalities of selected waste management alternatives: a comparative review and analysis. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 46(4): 335–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EU Council Landfill Directive 99/31/EC. (1999). . Accessed 28 July 2008.
  9. Eunomia Research & Consulting, Ecotec Research & Consulting, 2005. Costs for municipal waste management in the EU. European Commission. . Accessed 28 July 2008.
  10. Gabbay, S. (ed.). 2000. Israel's first national communication on climate change. . Accessed 28 July 2008.
  11. Hayashi, T., Yamamoto, M., Masuda, K. (2004). Evaluation of the recycling of biomass resources by using the waste account. Studies in Regional Science, 34(3): 289–295.Google Scholar
  12. He, Y., Inamori, Y., Mizuochi, M., Kong, H., Iwami, N., Sun, T. (2001). Nitrous oxide emissions from aerated composting of organic waste. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(11): 2347–2351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoshva Consultants. (2005). Master plan for solid waste in Israel. Submitted to the Ministry of Environment (Hebrew). .
  14. Janzen, R. A., McGill, W. B., Leonard, J. J., Jeffrey, S. R. (1999). Manure as a resource-ecological and economic considerations in balance. Transactions of the ASAE, 42(5): 1261–1274.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, P. M. (2005). A glossary of political economy.∼johnspm/gloss .
  16. Kan, I., Ayalon, O. (2006). Economic analysis of compost production in Israel. In: Proceedings of ISWA World Environment Congress and Exhibition, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  17. Public Utility Authority Israel, .
  18. Redd, A. (1991). Switzerland's other mountains. BioCycle, 32(11): 58–60.Google Scholar
  19. Ridolfi, R., Kneller, M., Donati, A., Pulselli, R. M. (2008). The greenhouse gas balance of the Province of Siena. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(2): 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ofira Ayalon
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Samuel Neaman InstituteTechnionIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Management, Graduate School of ManagementUniversity of HaifaTechnionIsrael

Personalised recommendations