Advertisement

United States: The Emergence of Environmental Considerations

  • Sandra Zellmer

This chapter traces the emergence of environmental considerations in U.S. water law, beginning with colonial America and proceeding through the Gilded Age of industrialization, the Progressive Era of wise use, the New Deal and the rise of the federal administrative state, and the modern environmental era. Early on, environmental challenges were addressed haphazardly. The federal government influenced water policy through navigational enhancements, reclamation works, and flood control, while state and local law governed water rights and public health issues. The 1970s brought uniform federal effluent limitations and protections for endangered species. The dawn of the twenty-first century increasingly sees collaborative restoration initiatives that draw on the strengths of federal, state, tribal, and local governments and citizens.

Keywords

Dams endangered species federalism flood control pollution public trust water quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, R. W. (1995). Addressing barriers to watershed protection. Environmental Law 25, 973–1106.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, R. W. (2003). The two lost books in the water quality trilogy: The elusive objectives of physical and biological integrity. Environmental Law 33, 29–77.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, R. W. (2007). Restoring Colorado river ecosystems: A troubled sense of immensity. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  4. Andreen, W. L. (2003). The evolution of water pollution control in the United States—State, local, and federal efforts, 1789–1972. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 22, 145–200(Pt. I), 22, 215–294(Pt. II).Google Scholar
  5. Andreen, W. L. (2004). Water quality today — Has the Clean Water Act been a success? Alabama Law Review, 55, 537–593.Google Scholar
  6. Army Corps of Engineers (2003). 2012: Aligning the U.S. army corps of engineers for success in the 21st century. Available at http://www.hq.usace.army.mil/stakeholders/Final.htm.
  7. Babbitt, B. (2005). Cities in the wilderness: A new vision of land use in America. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bakken, G. M. (2001). Lawyers in the American west, 1820–1920: A comment. Nevada Law Journal, 1, 88–111.Google Scholar
  9. Barry, J. M. (1998). Rising tide: The great Mississippi flood of 1927 and how it changed America. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  10. Beuscher, J. H., & Morrison, J. W. (1955). Judicial zoning through recent nuisance cases. Wisconsin Law Review, 1955, 440–457.Google Scholar
  11. Bureau of Reclamation (2007). Bureau of reclamation—About us. Available at http://www.usbr. gov/main/about/.
  12. Clemons, J. (2004). Interstate water disputes: A road map for states (Seagrant). Available at http://www.olemiss.edu/orgs/SGLC/MS-AL/acf.htm.
  13. Colburn, J. (2005). The indignity of Federal wildlife habitat law. Alabama Law Review, 57, 417–498.Google Scholar
  14. Covell, C. F. (1998). A survey of state instream flow programs in the western United States. University of Denver Water Law Review, 1, 177–205.Google Scholar
  15. Cox, W. E. (1997). Evolution of the Safe Drinking Water Act: A search for effective quality assurance strategies and workable concepts of federalism. William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, 21, 69–173.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, P. N. (1988). Protecting waste assimilation streamflows by the law of water allocation, nuisance, and public trust, and by environmental statutes. Natural Resources Journal, 28, 357–391.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, P. N. (1990). Federal and state water quality regulation and law in Missouri. Missouri Law Review 55, 411–507.Google Scholar
  18. Dellapenna, J. W. (2007). Regulated riparianism. In A. Kelly (Ed.), Waters and water rights Vol. 1 (ch. 9). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
  19. Diedrich, J. (2002). Wild & scenic river management responsibilities technical report. Washington, DC: Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordinating Council. Available at http://www.rivers. gov/publications/management.pdf
  20. Doremus, H. (2001). Adaptive management, the Endangered Species Act, and the institutional challenges of ‘new age’ environmental protection. Washburn Law Journal, 41, 50–89.Google Scholar
  21. Egan, T. (2006). The worst hard time: The untold story of those who survived the great American dust bowl. Boston, MA: Houghton Miflin.Google Scholar
  22. Environmental Protection Agency (2005). Permit status report for majors & minors (includes facilities covered by general non-SW permits). Available at http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/ grade_all.pdf.
  23. Ferrell, J. R. (1993). Big dam era: A legislative and institutional history of the Pick-Sloan Missouri basin program. St. Louis, MO: Army Corps of Engineers.Google Scholar
  24. Gaines, S. E. (2002). Fresh water: Environment or trade? Canadian-United States Law Journal, 28, 157–168.Google Scholar
  25. Getches, D. H. (2001). The metamorphosis of western water policy: Have federal laws and local decisions eclipsed the states' role? Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 20, 3–72.Google Scholar
  26. Gleick, P. H. (2006). Eco-system restoration challenges and opportunities. Pac. McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal 19, 1–11.Google Scholar
  27. Gordon, R. W. (2000). Hurst recaptured. Law & History Review, 18, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haines, A. L. (1996). The yellowstone story (Rev. Ed.). Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  29. Hays, S. P. (1959). Conservation and the gospel of efficiency: The progressive conservation movement 1890–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hodas, D. R. (1989). Private actions for public nuisance: Common law citizen suits for relief from environmental harm. Ecology Law Quarterly, 16, 883–908.Google Scholar
  31. Houck, O. A. (2002). The Clean Water Act TMDL program: Law, policy, and implementation (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.Google Scholar
  32. Houck, O. A. (2006). Can we save New Orleans? Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 19, 1–68.Google Scholar
  33. Kalen, S. (1993). Commerce to conservation: The call for a national water policy and the evolution of federal jurisdiction over wetlands. North Dakota Law Review, 69, 873–914.Google Scholar
  34. Karkkainen, B. C. (2002). Toward a smarter NEPA: Monitoring and managing government's environmental performance. Columbia Law Review, 102, 903–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klein, C. A. (1999). On dams and democracy. Oregon Law Review, 78, 641–733.Google Scholar
  36. Lawrence, M. P. (2005). Damming rivers, damning cultures. American Indian Law Review, 30, 247–289.Google Scholar
  37. McCool, D. (2005). The river commons: A new era in US water policy. Texas Law Review, 83, 1903–1927.Google Scholar
  38. Percival, R. V. (2004). The Clean Water Act and the demise of the federal common law of interstate nuisance. Alabama Law Review, 55, 717–774.Google Scholar
  39. Pisani, D. J. (2002). Water and American government: The reclamation bureau, national water policy, and the west, 1902–1935. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Plater, Z. J. B. (1999). Environmental law and three economies: Navigating a sprawling field of study, practice and societal governance in which everything is connected to everything else. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 23, 359–392.Google Scholar
  41. Rogers, P. (1993). America's water: Federal roles and responsibilities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Schneeweiss, J. (1997). Watershed protection strategies: A case study of the New York City watershed in light of the 1996 amendments to the Safe Drinking Water Act. Villanova Environmental Law Journal 8, 77–19.Google Scholar
  43. Spence, D. B. (1999). Managing delegation ex ante: Using law to steer administrative agencies. Journal of Legal Studies, 28, 413–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steinzor, R. I. (1996). Unfunded environmental mandates and the “new (new) federalism”: Devolution, revolution, or reform?. Minnesota Law Review, 81, 97–227.Google Scholar
  45. Tarlock, A. D. (2004). A first look at a modern legal regime for a ‘post-modern’ US Army Corps of Engineers. University of Kansas Law Review, 52, 1285–1325.Google Scholar
  46. Tarlock, A. D., & Tippy, R. (1970). The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968. Cornell Law Review, 55, 707–739.Google Scholar
  47. Utley, R. M., & Mackintosh, B. (1989). The department of everything else: Highlights of interior history, the conservation movement. Available at http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/ utley-mackintosh/interior6.htm.
  48. Wilkinson, C. F. (1989). The headwaters of the public trust: Some of the traditional doctrine. Environmental Law, 19, 425–472.Google Scholar
  49. Zellmer, S. (2000). The devil, the details, and the dawn of the 21st century administrative state: Beyond the new deal. Arizona State Law Journal, 32, 941–1049.Google Scholar
  50. Zellmer, S. (2004). A new corps of discovery for Missouri River management. Nebraska Law Review, 83, 305–361.Google Scholar

Cases

  1. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon (1995). United States Reports 515:687–736.Google Scholar
  2. Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co. (1985) (Wash.). Pacific Reporter (2nd series) 709:782–793.Google Scholar
  3. California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1990). United States Reports 495:490–507.Google Scholar
  4. Cauley v. United States (1965) (District Court of the District of North Carolina). Federal Supplement 242:866–870.Google Scholar
  5. Cities Service Company v. State (1975) (Florida Court of Appeals). Southern Reporter (2nd series) 312:799–804.Google Scholar
  6. City of Albuquerque v. Browner (1996) (9th Circuit Court of Appeals). Federal Reporter (3rd series) 97:415–429.Google Scholar
  7. City of Klamath Falls v. Babbitt (1996) (District Court of the District of Columbia). Federal Supplement 947:1–9.Google Scholar
  8. City of Milwaukee v. Illinois (1981). United States Reports 451:304–354.Google Scholar
  9. Dubois v. Department of Agriculture (1966) (1st Circuit Court of Appeals). Federal Reporter (3rd series) 102:1273–1301.Google Scholar
  10. Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker (2008). Supreme Court Reporter 128:2605–2641.Google Scholar
  11. First Iowa Hydro-Electric Co-op v. Federal Power Commission (1946). United States Reports 328:152–188.Google Scholar
  12. Fortier v. Flambeau Plastics Co. (1991) (Wisconsin). Northwest Reporter 476:593–684.Google Scholar
  13. Harrison v. Spring Valley HG Co. (1881) (California). Pacific Reporter 4:381–382.Google Scholar
  14. Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois (1892). United States Reports 146:387–476.Google Scholar
  15. Kalur v. Resor (1971) (District Court of the District of Columbia).335:1–15.Google Scholar
  16. Klamath Water Users Protective Association v. Patterson (1999) (9th Circuit Court of Appeals). Federal Reporter (3rd series) 204:1206–1214.Google Scholar
  17. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council (1989). United States Reports 490:360–385.Google Scholar
  18. Missouri v. Illinois (1906). United States Reports 200:496–526.Google Scholar
  19. National Association of Homebuilders v. Defenders of Wildlife (2007). Supreme Court Reporter 127:2518–2553.Google Scholar
  20. Nelson v. O'Neal (1871). Montana Reports 1:284.Google Scholar
  21. New Jersey v. City of New York (1931). United States Reports 283:473–482.Google Scholar
  22. New York v. New Jersey (1921). United States Reports 256:296–314.Google Scholar
  23. O'Neill v. United States (1995) (9th Circuit Court of Appeals). Federal Reporter (3rd series) 50:677–689.Google Scholar
  24. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Sagamore Coal Co (1924) (Pennsylvania). Atlantic Reporter: 126:386–392, writ of certiorari denied United States Reports 267:592.Google Scholar
  25. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Sanderson (1886) (Pennsylvania). Atlantic Reporter 6:453–465.Google Scholar
  26. Pollard v. Hagan (1845). United States Reports 44:212–235.Google Scholar
  27. PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Dept. of Ecology (1994). United States Reports 511:700–737.Google Scholar
  28. Rapanos v. United States (2006). United States Reports 547:715–812.Google Scholar
  29. Riverside Irrigation District v. Andrews (1985) (10th Circuit Court of Appeals). Federal Reporter (2nd series) 758:508–514.Google Scholar
  30. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council (1989). United States Reports 490:332–359.Google Scholar
  31. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Sagamore Coal Co (1924) (Pennsylvania). Atlantic Reporter: 126:386–392, writ of certiorari denied United States Reports 267:592.Google Scholar
  32. S.D. Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection (2006). United States Reports 547:370–387.Google Scholar
  33. Sierra Club North Star Chapter v. Pena (1998) (District Court of the District of Minnesota). Federal Supplement (2nd series) 1:971–983.Google Scholar
  34. Solid Waste Authority of Northern Cook County v. Army Corps of Engineers (2001). United States Reports 531:159–197.Google Scholar
  35. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill (1978). United States Reports 437:153–213.Google Scholar
  36. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District v. United States (2001). Federal Claims Reports 49:313–324.Google Scholar
  37. Udall v. Federal Power Commission (1967). United States Reports 387:428–455.Google Scholar
  38. United States v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (1992) (District Court for the Eastern District of California). Federal Supplement 788:1126–1136.Google Scholar
  39. United States v. Republic Steel Corp. (1960). United States Reports 362:482–510.Google Scholar
  40. United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes (1985). United States Reports 474:121–139.Google Scholar
  41. United States v. Standard Oil Co. (1966). United States Reports 384:224–237.Google Scholar

Other Government Materials

  1. Act of Aug. 26, 1935.Google Scholar
  2. Clean Water Act (1972).Google Scholar
  3. Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) 40: Pt. 230.Google Scholar
  4. Endangered Species Act (1973).Google Scholar
  5. Federal Power Act (1920).Google Scholar
  6. Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1948).Google Scholar
  7. Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments (1961).Google Scholar
  8. Flood Control Act (1928).Google Scholar
  9. Flood Control Act (1936).Google Scholar
  10. Food Security Act (1985).Google Scholar
  11. National Environmental Policy Act (1970).Google Scholar
  12. Reclamation Act (1902).Google Scholar
  13. Rivers and Harbours Act (1899).Google Scholar
  14. Safe Drinking Water Act (1974).Google Scholar
  15. Water Quality Improvement Act (1970).Google Scholar
  16. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Zellmer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations