Skip to main content

Collective Intentions and the Phenomenology of Time – The Theory of Non-Domination in Communication

  • Chapter
Existence, Historical Fabulation, Destiny

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 99))

  • 766 Accesses

Abstract

The paper discusses some conceptual problem of communication in non-domination terms of the republican theory of freedom in comparison to Husserlian phenomenology of time. While our mental constructs and imagination are largely shaped by past-oriented narratives of grand cultural patterns, in the modern world we are close relatives of Heraclitus not Parmenides. As a matter of fact we must have strict and certain knowledge (our personal and subjective, too), but we can only have a secure one. The search for security is our response to diagnosed risk factors. Objectivity and intersubjectivity of knowledge is gained by conducting and futurological work, and not through in-depth in historical analyses. This paper intends to be an answer to these socio-economic processes of the modern world on neutral territory of phenomenology of time. The paper investigates the question about creation of social sense of communication in social time of phenomenology of consciousness of time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berlin, Isaiah (1958). Two Concepts of Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant, Benjamin (1988). The Liberty of Ancients Compared with that of Moderns, [in:] B. Fontanta (red.) (1988). Political Writings, Cambridge, 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John (1965). Two Treasides of Government, New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair (1981, 1987). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, Philip (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, Philip (2001). A Theory of Freedom. From Psychological to the Politics Agency, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1993). Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, Michael (1984). Liberalism and Its Critics, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz Alfred (1962). Collected Papers, vol. 1: The Problem of Social Reality, edited and introduced by M. Natanson with a preface by H. L. van Breda, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin (1998). Liberty Before Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles (1979). What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty, [in:] Alan Ryan (red.), The Idea of Freedom, Oxford, 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Józef Olbromski, C. (2009). Collective Intentions and the Phenomenology of Time – The Theory of Non-Domination in Communication. In: Existence, Historical Fabulation, Destiny. Analecta Husserliana, vol 99. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9802-4_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics