Abstract
To predict a given physicochemical or biological property, the relationships can be identified between the chemical structure and the desired property. Ideally these relationships should be described in reliable quantitative terms. To obtain statistically significant relationships, one needs relatively large series of property parameters. Chromatography is a unique method which can provide a great amount of quantitatively precise, reproducible, and comparable retention data for large sets of structurally diversified compounds (analytes). On the other hand, chemometrics is recognized as a valuable tool for accomplishing a variety of tasks in a chromatography laboratory. Chemometrics facilitates the interpretation of large sets of complex chromatographic and structural data. Among various chemometric methods, multiple regression analysis is most often performed to process retention data and to extract chemical information on analytes. And the methodology of quantitative structure–(chromatographic) retention relationships (QSRRs) is mainly based on multiple regression analysis. QSRR can be a valuable source of knowledge on both the nature of analytes and of the macromolecules forming the stationary phases. Therefore, quantitative structure–retention relationships have been considered as a model approach to establish strategy and methods of property predictions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Kaliszan R (1992) Quantitative structure–retention relationships. Anal Chem 64:619A–631A
Kaliszan R, Foks H (1977) The relationship between the Rm values and the connectivity indices for pyrazine carbothioamide derivatives. Chromatographia 10:346–349
Kaliszan R (1977) Correlation between the retention indices and the connectivity indices of alcohols and methyl esters with complex cyclic structure. Chromatographia 10:529–531
Michotte Z, Massart DL (1977) Molecular connectivity and retention indexes. J Pharm Sci 66:1630–1632
Kaliszan R (1987) Quantitative structure–chromatographic retention relationships. Wiley, New York
Karelson M, Lobanov VS, Katritzky AR (1996) Quantum-chemical descriptors in QSAR/QSPR studies. Chem Rev 96:1027–1043
Kaliszan R (2000) Recent advances in quantitative structure–retention relationships. In: Valko K (ed) Separation methods in drug synthesis and purification. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Kaliszan R (2007) QSRR: Quantitative structure–(chromatographic) retention relationships. Chem Rev 107:3212–3246.
Smith RM (1995) Retention and selectivity in liquid chromatography. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Jurs PC (1996) Computer software applications in chemistry. Wiley, New York
Forgacs E, Cserhati T (1997) Molecular bases of chromatographic separations. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Kaliszan R (1997) Structure and retention in chromatography. A chemometric approach. Harwood, Amsterdam
Jinno K (ed) (1997) Chromatographic separations based on molecular recognition. Wiley, New York
Hansch C, Fujita T (1964) ρ-σ-π analysis. A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure. J Am Chem Soc 86:1616–1626
Albert A (1965) Selective toxicity. Wiley, New York
Seydel JK, Schaper K-J (1979) Chemische struktur und biologische aktivität von wirkstoffen. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim
Iwasa J, Fuijta T, Hansch CJ (1965) Substituent constants for aliphatic functions obtained from partition coefficients. J Med Chem 8:150–153
Wang QS, Zhang L (1999) Review of research on quantitative structure–retention relationships in thin-layer chromatography. J Liq Chrom Rel Techn 22:1–14
Sadek PC, Carr PW, Doherty RM et al. (1985) Study of retention processes in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography by the use of the solvatochromic comparison method. Anal Chem 57:2971–2978
Carr PW, Doherty RM, Kamlet MJ et al. (1986) Study of temperature and mobile-phase effects in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography by the use of the solvatochromic comparison method. Anal Chem 58:2674–2680
Snyder LR, Carr PW, Rutan SC (1993) Solvatochromically based solvent-selectivity triangle. J Chromatogr A 656:537–547
Hasan MN, Jurs PC (1990) Prediction of gas and liquid chromatographic retention indices of polyhalogenated biphenyls. Anal Chem 62:2318–2323
Katritzky AR, Karelson M, Lobanov VS (1997) QSPR as a means of predicting and understanding chemical and physical properties in terms of structure. Pure Appl Chem 69:245–248
Lucic B, Trinajstic N, Sild S et al. (1999) A new efficient approach for variable selection based on multiregression: Prediction of gas chromatographic retention times and response factors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39:610–621
Katritzky AR, Chen K, Maran U et al. (2000) QSPR correlation and predictions of GC retention indexes for methyl-branched hydrocarbons produced by insects. Anal Chem 72:101–109
Ignatz-Hoover F, Petrukhin R, Karelson M et al. (2001) QSRR correlation of free-radical polymerization chain-transfer constants for styrene. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:295–299
Todeschini R, Consonni V (2000) Handbook of molecular descriptors. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Todeschini R, Consonni V, Pavan M (http://www.disat.unimib.it/chm/dragon.htm) Dragon software version 5.0, 2004
Ivanciuc O, Ivanciuc T, Cabrol-Bass D et al. (2000) Comparison of weighting schemes for molecular graph descriptors: Application in quantitative structure–retention relationship models for alkylphenols in gas-liquid chromatography. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 40:723–743
Junkes BS, Amboni RDMC, Yunes RA et al. (2003) Prediction of the chromatographic retention of saturated alcohols on stationary phases of different polarity applying the novel semi-empirical topological index. Anal Chim Acta 477:29–39
Ośmiałowski K, Halkiewicz J, Kaliszan R (1986) Quantum chemical parameters in correlation analysis of gas–liquid chromatographic retention indices of amines. J Chromatogr 361:63–69
Randić M (1975) On characterization of molecular branching. J Am Chem Soc 97:6609–6615
Hanai T (2005) Chromatography in silico, basic concept in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem 382:708–717
Salo M, Sirén H, Volin P et al. (1996) Structure–retention relationships of steroid hormones in reversed-phase liquid chromatography and micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography. J Chromatogr A 728:83–88
Makino M (1999) An analysis of the chromatographic behavior of the environmental contaminants polychlorinated naphthalenes using electrical and topological descriptors. Toxicol Environ Chem 73:117–128
Dimov N, Stoev S (1999) A new approach to structure–retention relationships. Acta Chromatogr 9:17–18
Zhang L, Zhang M, Tang GZ et al. (2000) Retention prediction system of O-aryl,O-(1-methylthioethylidene-amino)phosphates on RP-HPLC. HRC J High Resol Chromatogr 23:445–448
Ledesma EB, Wornat MJ (2000) QSRR prediction of chromatographic retention of ethynyl-substituted PAH from semiempirically computed solute descriptors. Anal Chem 72:5437–5443
Kaliszan R, Ośmiałowski K, Tomellini SA et al. (1986) Quantitative retention relationships as a function of mobile and C18 stationary phase composition for non-cogeneric solutes. J Chromatogr 352:141–155
Kaliszan R, Lamparczyk H, Radecki A (1979) A relationship between regression of dimethylnitrosamine-demethylase by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their shape. Biochem Pharmacol 28:123–125
Wise SA, Bonnett WJ, Guenther FR et al. (1981) A relationship between reversed-phase C18 liquid chromatographic retention and the shape of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Chromatogr Sci 19:457–465
Lippa KA, Sander LC, Mountain RD (2005) Molecular dynamics simulations of alkylsilane stationary-phase order and disorder. 1. Effects of surface coverage and bonding chemistry. Anal Chem 77:7852–7861
Montaña MP, Pappao B, Debattista NB et al. (2000) High-performance liquid chromatography of chalcones: Quantitative structure–retention relationships using partial least-squares (PLS) modeling. Chromatographia 51:727–735
Silva MF, Chipre LF, Raba J et al. (2001) Amino acids characterization by reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Partial least-squares modeling of their transport properties. Chromatographia 53:392–400
Csiktusnádi-Kiss GA, Forgács E, Markuszewski M (1998) Application of multivariate mathematical–statistical methods to compare reversed-phase thin-layer and liquid chromatographic behaviour of tetrazolium salts in Quantitative Structure–Retention Relationships (QSRR) studies. Analusis 26:400–406
Åberg MK, Jacobsson SP (2001) Pre-processing of three-way data by pulse-coupled neural networks – An imaging approach. Chemom Intell Lab Sys 57:25–36
Tham SY, Agatonovic-Kustrin S (2000) Application of the artificial neural network in quantitative structure-gradient elution retention relationship of phenylthiocarbamyl amino acids derivatives. J Pharm Biomed Anal 28:581–590
Ruggieri F, D’Archivio AA, Carlucci G et al. (2005) Application of artificial neural networks for prediction of retention factors of triazine herbicides in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1076:163–169
Bączek T, Kaliszan R (2002) Combination of linear solvent strength model and quantitative structure–retention relationships as a comprehensive procedure of approximate prediction of retention in gradient liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 962:41–55
Kaliszan R, Bączek T, Buciński A et al. (2003) Prediction of gradient retention from the linear solvent strength (LSS) model, quantitative structure–retention relationships (QSRR), and artificial neural networks (ANN). J Sep Sci 26:271–282
Snyder R, Dolan JW (1998) The linear-solvent-strength model of gradient elution. Adv Chromatogr 38:115–185
Haber P, Bączek, T, Kaliszan R et al. (2000) Computer simulation for the simultaneous optimization of any two variables and any chromatographic procedure. J Chromatogr Sci 38:386–392
Al-Haj MA, Kaliszan R, Nasal A (1999) Test analytes for studies of the molecular mechanism of chromatographic separations by quantitative structure–retention relationships. Anal Chem 71:2976–2985
Schefzick S, Kibbey C, Bradley MP (2004) Prediction of HPLC conditions using QSPR techniques: An effective tool to improve combinatorial library design. J Comb Chem 6:916–927
Cramer RD III, Patterson DE, Bunce JD (1988) Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J Am Chem Soc 110:5959–5967
Luo H, Cheng Y-K (2005) Quantitative structure–retention relationship of nucleic-acid bases revisited. CoMFA on purine RPLC retention. QSAR Comb Sci 24:969–975
Sybyl (Linux) 6.9.1 (2003) Tripos, Inc. St. Louis, MO, USA
Sutter JM, Peterson TA, Jurs PC (1997) Prediction of gas chromatographic retention indices of alkylbenzenes. Anal Chim Acta 342:113–122
Massart DL, Vandeginste BGM, Buydens LMC et al. (1997) Handbook of chemometrics and qualimetrics: Part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Vandeginste BGM, Massart DL, Buydens LMC et al. (1998) Handbook of chemometrics and qualimetrics: Part B. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Ros F, Pintore M, Chrétien JR (2002) Molecular descriptor selection combining genetic algorithms and fuzzy logic: Application to database mining procedures. Chemometr Intell Lab Sys 63:15–26
Put R, Perrin C, Questier F et al. (2003) Classification and regression tree analysis for molecular descriptor selection and retention prediction in chromatographic quantitative structure–retention relationship studies. J Chromatogr A 988:261–276
Put R, Xu QS, Massart DL, Vander Heyden Y (2004) Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) in chromatographic quantitative structure–retention relationship studies. J Chromatogr A 1055:11–19
Abraham MH, Chadha HS, Whiting GS et al. (1994) Hydrogen bonding. 32. An analysis of water–octanol and water–alkane partitioning and the Δlog P parameter of seiler. J Pharm Sci 83:1085–1100
Abraham MH, Treiner C, Rosés M et al. (1996) Linear free energy relationship analysis of microemulsion electrokinetic chromatographic determination of liophilicity. J Chromatogr A 752:243–249
Abraham MH, Chadha HS, Leitao RAE et al. (1997) Determination of solute lipophilicity, as log P(octanol) and log P(alkane) using poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) and immobilised artificial membrane stationary phases in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 766:35–47
Abraham MH (1997) On characterization of some GLC chiral stationary phases: LFER analysis. Anal Chem 69:613–617
Abraham MH (2004) The factors that influence permeation across the blood–brain barrier. Eur J Med Chem 39:235–240
Abraham MH, Poole CF, Poole SK (1999) Classification of stationary phases and other materials by gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A 842:79–114
Abraham MH, Ibrahim A, Zissimos AM (2004) Determination of sets of solute descriptors from chromatographic measurements. J Chromatogr A 1037:29–47
Wilson NS, Nelson MD, Dolan JW et al. (2002) Column selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography: I. A general quantitative relationship. J Chromatogr A 961:171–193
Zhao J, Carr PW (2000) A comparative study of the chromatographic selectivity of polystyrene-coated zirconia and related reversed-phase materials. Anal Chem 72:302–309
Park JH, Yoon MH, Ryu YK et al. (1998) Characterization of some normal-phase liquid chromatographic stationary phases based on linear solvation energy relationships. J Chromatogr A 796:249–258
Rosés M, Bolliet D, Poole CF (1998) Comparison of solute descriptors for predicting retention of ionic compounds (phenols) in reversed-phase liquid chromatography using the solvation parameter model. J Chromatogr A 829:29–40
Li J, Cai B (2001) Evaluation of the retention dependence on the physicochemical properties of solutes in reversed-phase liquid chromatographic linear gradient elution based on linear solvation energy relationships. J Chromatogr A 905:35–46
Li J, Sun J, Cui Z et al. (2006) Quantitative structure–retention relationship studies using immobilized artificial membrane chromatography I: Amended linear solvation energy relationships with the introduction of a molecular electronic factor. J Chromatogr A 1132:174–182
Vonk EC, Lewandowska K, Claessens HA et al. (2003) Quantitative structure–retention relationships in reversed-phase liquid chromatography using several stationary and mobile phases. J Sep Sci 26:777–792
Poole CF, Poole SK (2002) Column selectivity from the perspective of the solvation parameter model. J Chromatogr A 965:263–299
Vitha M, Carr PC (2006) The chemical interpretation and practice of linear solvation energy relationships in chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1126:143–194
Jackson PT, Schure MR, Weber TP et al. (1997) Intermolecular interactions involved in solute retention on carbon media in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 69:416–425
Sandi A, Bede A, Szepesy I et al. (1997) Characterization of different RP-HPLC columns by a gradient elution technique. Chromatographia 45:206–214
Tan LC, Carr PW (1998) Study of retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography using linear solvation energy relationships II. The mobile phase. J Chromatogr A 799:1–19
Snyder LR, Dolan JW, Carr PW (2004) The hydrophobic-subtraction model of reversed-phase column selectivity. J Chromatogr A 1060:77–116
Bączek T, Kaliszan R, Novotná K et al. (2005) Comparative characteristics of HPLC columns based on quantitative structure–retention relationships (QSRR) and hydrophobic-subtraction model. J Chromatogr A 1075:109–115
Kaliszan R, van Straten MA, Markuszewski M et al. (1999) Molecular mechanism of retention in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and classification of modern stationary phases by using quantitative structure–retention relationships. J Chromatogr A 855:455–486
Al-Haj MA, Kaliszan R, Buszewski B (2001) Quantitative structure–retention relationships with model analytes as a means of an objective evaluation of chromatographic columns. J Chromatogr Sci 39:29–38
Bączek T, Kaliszan R (2003) Predictive approaches to gradient retention based on analyte structural descriptors from calculation chemistry. J Chromatogr A 987:29–37
Kaliszan R, Wiczling P, Markuszewski MJ (2004) pH gradient reversed-phase HPLC. Anal Chem 76:749–760
Meek JL (1980) Prediction of peptide retention times in high-pressure liquid chromatography on the basis of amino acid composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:1632–1636
Palmblad M, Ramström M, Markides KE et al. (2002) Prediction of chromatographic retention and protein identification in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 74:5826–5830
Petritis K, Kangas LJ, Ferguson PL et al. (2003) Use of artificial neural networks for the accurate prediction of peptide liquid chromatography elution times in proteome analyses. Anal Chem 75:1039–1048
Kaliszan R, Bączek T, Cimochowska A et al. (2005) Prediction of high-performance liquid chromatography retention of peptides with the use of quantitative structure–retention relationships. Proteomics 5:409–415
Bączek T, Wiczling P, Marszałł M et al. (2005) Prediction of peptide retention at different HPLC conditions from multiple linear regression models. J Proteome Res 4:555–563
Bączek T (2006) Chemometric evaluation of relationships between retention and physicochemical parameters in terms of multidimensional liquid chromatography of peptides. J Sep Sci 29:547–554
Bączek T (2005) Improvement of peptides identification in proteomics with the use of new analytical and bioinformatic strategies. Curr Pharm Anal 1:31–40
Put R, Daszykowski M, Bączek T et al. (2006) Retention prediction of peptides based on uninformative variable elimination by partial least squares. J Proteome Res 5:1618–1625
Mazza CB, Sukumar N, Breneman CM et al. (2001) Prediction of protein retention in ion-exchange systems using molecular descriptors obtained from crystal structure. Anal Chem 73:5457–5461
Ladiwala A, Rege K, Breneman CM et al. (2003) Investigation of mobile phase salt type effects on protein retention and selectivity in cation-exchange systems using quantitative structure–retention relationship models. Langmuir 19:8443–8454
Tugcu N, Song M, Breneman CM et al. (2003) Prediction of the effect of mobile-phase salt type on protein retention and selectivity in anion-exchange systems. Anal Chem 75:3563–3572
Ladiwala A, Xia F, Luo Q et al. (2006) Investigation of protein retention and selectivity in HIC systems using quantitative structure–retention relationship models. Biotechnol Bioeng 93:836–850
Chen J, Luo Q, Breneman CM et al. (2007) Classification of protein adsorption and recovery at low salt conditions in hydrophobic interaction chromatographic systems. J Chromatogr A 1139:236–246
Song MH, Breneman CM, Bi JB et al. (2002) Prediction of protein retention times in anion-exchange chromatography systems using support vector regression. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42:1347–1357
Heberger K (1999) Evaluation of polarity indicators and stationary phases by principal component analysis in gas–liquid chromatography. Chemom Intell Lab Sys 47:41–49
Markuszewski M, Krass JD, Hippe T et al. (1998) Separation of nitroaromatics and their transformation products in soil around ammunition plants: New high performance liquid chromatographic charge transfer stationary phases. Chemosphere 37:559–575
Jiskra J, Claessens HA, Cramers CA et al. (2002) Quantitative structure–retention relationships in comparative studies of behavior of stationary phases under high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrochromatography conditions. J Chromatogr A 977:193–206
Cserháti T, Forgacs E, Payer K et al. (1998) Quantitative structure–retention relationships in separation mechanism studies on polyethylene-coated silica and alumina stationary phases. LCGC Int 4:240–252
Abraham MH, Rosés M, Poole CF et al. (1997) Hydrogen bonding. 42. Characterization of reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic C18 stationary phases. J Phys Org Chem 10:358–368
Sandi A, Szepesy L (1998) Characterization of various reversed-phase columns using the linear free energy relationship. I. Evaluation based on retention factors. J Chromatogr A 818:1–17
Valko K, Plass M, Bevan C et al. (1998) Relationships between the chromatographic hydrophobicity indices and solute descriptors obtained by using several reversed-phase, diol, nitrile, cyclodextrin and immobilised artificial membrane-bonded high-performance liquid chromatography columns. J Chromatogr A 797:41–55
Baranowska I, Zydroń, M (2002) Quantitative structure–retention relationships of xanthines in RP HPLC systems with the new Chromolith RP-18e stationary phases. Anal Bioanal Chem 373:889–892
Topliss JG, Edwards RP (1979) Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure–activity relationships. J Med Chem 22:1238–1244
Jiskra J, Claessens HA, Cramers CA et al. (2002) Quantitative structure–retention relationships in comparative studies of behavior of stationary phases under high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrochromatography conditions. J Chromatogr A 977:193–206
Rohrschneider L (1999) Prototypical test substances for a reversed phase in a retention parameter model. HRC J High Resol Chromatogr 22:454–458
Kaliszan R (2000) Quantitative structure–retention relationships (QSRR) in chromatography. In: Wilson ID, Adlard ER, Cooke M (eds) et al. Encyclopedia of separation science, vol 9. Academic Press, San Diego
Pliška V, Testa B, van de Waaterbemd H (1996) Lipophilicity in drug action and toxicology. VCH, Weinheim
Berthelot M, Jungfleisch E (1872) Sur les lois qui pre´ sident au partage d’un corps entre deux dissolvants (expe´ riences). Ann Chim Phys 26:396–407
Martin AJP (1941) A new form of chromatogram employing two liquid phases. Biochem J 35:1358–1368
Cserháti T, Valko K (1994) Chromatographic determination of molecular interactions. Applications in biochemistry, chemistry and biophysics. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Poole SK, Poole CF (2003) Separation methods for estimating octanol–water partition coefficients. J Chromatogr B 797:3–19
Wang QS, Zhang L, Yang HZ (1999) Lipophilicity determination of some potential photosystem ii inhibitors on reversed-phase high-performance thin-layer chromatography. J Chromatogr Sci 37:41–44
Nasal A, Siluk D, Kaliszan R (2003) Chromatographic retention parameters in medicinal chemistry and molecular pharmacology. Curr Med Chem 10:381–426
Kaliszan R, Nasal A, Markuszewski MJ (2003) New approaches to chromatographic determination of lipophilicity of xenobiotics. Anal Bioanal Chem 377:803–811
Nasal, A, Kaliszan R (2006) Progress in the use of HPLC for evaluation of lipophilicity. Curr Comp-Aided Drug Design 2:327–340
Bączek T, Markuszewski M, Kaliszan R, van Straten, MA, Claessens HA (2000) Linear and quadratic relationships between retention and organic modifier content in eluent in reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography: A systematic comparative statistical study. HRC J High Resol Chromatogr 23:667–676
Poole CF, Gunatilleka AD, Poole SK (2000) In search of a chromatographic model for biopartitioning. Adv Chromatogr 40:159–230
Kaliszan R (1986) Quantitative relationships between molecular structure and chromatographic retention. Implications in physical, analytical, and medicinal chemistry. CRC Crit Rev Anal Chem 16:323–383
Braumann T (1986) Determination of hydrophobic parameters by reversed-phase liquid chromatography: Theory, experimental techniques, and application in studies on quantitative structure–activity relationships. J Chromatogr 373:191–225
Kaliszan R, Haber P, Bączek T et al. (2001) Gradient HPLC in the determination of drug lipophilicity and acidity. Pure Appl Chem 73:1465–1475
Kaliszan R, Haber P, Bączek T et al. (2002) Lipophilicity and pKa estimates from gradient high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 965:117–127
Wiczling P, Markuszewski MJ, Kaliszan R (2004) Determination of pKa by pH gradient reversed-phase HPLC. Anal Chem 76:3069–3077
Wiczling P, Markuszewski MJ, Kaliszan M et al. (2005) pH/organic solvent double-gradient reversed-phase HPLC. Anal Chem 77:449–458
Kaliszan R, Wiczling P (2005) Theoretical opportunities and actual limitations of pH gradient HPLC. Anal Bioanal Chem 382:718–727
Wiczling P, Kawczak P, Nasal A et al. (2006) Simultaneous determination of pKa and lipophilicity by gradient RP HPLC. Anal Chem 78:239–249
Subirats X, Bosch E, Rosés M (2007) Retention of ionisable compounds on high-performance liquid chromatography XVII. Estimation of the pH variation of aqueous buffers with the change of the methanol fraction of the mobile phase. J Chromatogr A 1138:203–215
Novotny L, Abdel-Hamid M, Hamza H (2000) Inosine and 2'-deoxyinosine and their synthetic analogues: Lipophilicity in the relation to their retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography and the stability characteristics. J Pharm Biomed Anal 24:125–132
Dai J, Jin S, Yao S, Wang LS (2001) Prediction of partition coefficient and toxicity for benzaldehyde compounds by their capacity factors and various molecular descriptors. Chemosphere 42:899–907
Donovan SF, Pescatore MC (2002) Method for measuring the logarithm of the octanol–water partition coefficient by using short octadecyl-poly(vinyl alcohol) high-performance liquid chromatography columns. J Chromatogr A 952:47–61
Gulyaeva N, Zaslavsky A, Lechner P et al. (2003) Relative hydrophobicity and lipophilicity of drugs measured by aqueous two-phase partitioning, octanol-buffer partitioning and HPLC. A simple model for predicting blood–brain distribution. Eur J Med Chem 38:391–396
Welerowicz T, Buszewski B (2005) The effect of stationary phase on lipophilicity determination of β-blockers using reverse-phase chromatographic systems. Biomed Chromatogr 19:725–736
Vervoort RJM, Debets AJJ, Claessens HA et al. (2000) Optimisation and characterisation of silica-based reversed-phase liquid chromatographic systems for the analysis of basic pharmaceuticals. J Chromatogr A 897:1–22
Buszewski B Gadzała-Kopciuch RM Kaliszan R et al. (1998) Polyfunctional chemically bonded stationary phase for reversed phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Chromatographia 48:615–622
Lombardo F, Shalaeva MY, Tupper KA et al. (2001) ElogDoct: A tool for lipophilicity determination in drug discovery. 2. Basic and neutral compounds. J Med Chem 44:2490–2497
Kaliszan R, Marszałł MP, Markuszewski MJ et al. (2004) Suppression of deleterious effects of free silanols in liquid chromatography by imidazolium tetrafluoroborate ionic liquids. J Chromatogr A 1030:263–271
Marszałł MP, Bączek T, Kaliszan R (2006) Evaluation of the silanol-suppressing potency of ionic liquids. J Sep Sci 29:1138–1145
Pidgeon C, Venkataram UV (1989) Immobilized artificial membrane chromatography: Supports composed of membrane lipids. Anal Biochem 176:36–47
Thurnhofer H, Schnabel J, Betz M et al. (1991) Cholesterol-transfer protein located in the intestinal brush-border membrane. Partial purification and characterization. Biochim Biophys Acta 1064:275–286
Kaliszan R, Kaliszan A, Wainer IW (1993) Deactivated hydrocarbonaceous silica and immobilized artificial membrane stationary phases in high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of hydrophobicities of organic bases: Relationship to log P and CLOGP. J Pharm Biomed Anal 11:505–511
Ducarme A, Neuwels M, Goldstein S et al. (1998) IAM retention and blood–brain barrier penetration. Eur J Med Chem 33:215–223
Kępczyńska E, Bojarski J, Haber P et al. (2000) Retention of barbituric acid derivatives on immobilized artificial membrane stationary phase and its correlation with biological activity. Biomed Chromatogr 14:256–260
Vrakas D, Hadjipavlou-Litina D, Tsantili-Kakoulidou A (2005) Retention of substituted coumarins using immobilized artificial membrane (IAM) chromatography: A comparative study with n-octanol partitioning and reversed-phase HPLC and TLC. J Pharm Biomed Anal 39:908–913
Kaliszan R (1998) Retention data from affinity high-performance liquid chromatography in view of chemometrics. J Chromatogr B 715:229–244
Bertucci C, Bartolini M, Gotti R et al. (2003) Drug affinity to immobilized target bio-polymers by high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr B 797:111–129
Domenici E, Bertucci C, Salvadori P et al. (1990) Synthesis and chromatographic properties of an HPLC chiral stationary phase based upon human serum albumin. Chromatographia 29:170–176
Domenici E, Bertucci C, Salvadori P et al. (1991) Use of a human serum albumin-based high-performance liquid chromatography chiral stationary phase for the investigation of protein binding: Detection of the allosteric interaction between warfarin and benzodiazepine binding sites. J Pharm Sci 80:164–166
Noctor TAG, Pham CD, Kaliszan R et al. (1992) Stereochemical aspects of benzodiazepine binding to human serum albumin. I. Enantioselective high performance liquid affinity chromatographic examination of chiral and achiral binding interactions between 1,4-benzodiazepines and human serum albumin. Mol Pharmacol 42:506–511
Kaliszan R, Nasal A, Turowski M (1995) Binding site for basic drugs on α1-acid glycoprotein as revealed by chemometric analysis of biochromatographic data. Biomed Chromatogr 9:211–215
Kaliszan R, Nasal A, Turowski M (1996) Quantitative structure–retention relationships in the examination of the topography of the binding site of antihistamine drugs on α1-acid glycoprotein. J Chromatogr A 722:25–32
Goolkasian DL, Slaughter RL, Edwards DJ et al. (1983) Displacement of lidocaine from serum α1-acid glycoprotein binding sites by basic drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 25:413–417
Acknowledgement
The work was supported by the Polish State Committee for Scientific Research Project N N405 1040 33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaliszan, R., Bączek, T. (2010). QSAR in Chromatography: Quantitative Structure–Retention Relationships (QSRRs). In: Puzyn, T., Leszczynski, J., Cronin, M. (eds) Recent Advances in QSAR Studies. Challenges and Advances in Computational Chemistry and Physics, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9783-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9783-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9782-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9783-6
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)