The NAWIlino-Box – A Science Exploration Kit and Its Use in Practical Teacher Training

  • L. Bröll
  • J. Friedrich
  • M. Oetken


Based on the fact that many teachers in primary school do not feel competent to teach science, the NAWIlino-Box was designed at the University of Education in Freiburg as part of a current thesis project. Especially pupils in primary school are interested in scientific topics. The NAWIlino-Box picks up this interest and illustrates scientific coherence with conceptually clear experiments. Pupils can use the NAWIlino-Box during their whole primary school time. Key content like sustainability is just as important as the ability to inspire children for scientific experiments. With our portable learning laboratory pupils get the possibility to expose themselves to science for longer periods, so that they can explore and encourage their own skills. Although the choice of experiments implemented had originally been geared towards the curriculum of the state of Baden-Württemberg, the NAWIlino-Box has no features barring its use on a national level, as shown by a comparison of federal curricula in Germany. To complement each experimental unit, we developed individual solution sheets and didactical and methodical advice for integration of the material in class.


Primary School Teaching Science Professional Training Scientific Topic Primary School Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank “Fonds der chemischen Industrie,” “Lernort Labor,” “badenova,” and “Landesstiftung Baden-Württemberg” for supporting this work.


  1. 1..
    Prenzel M, Geiser H, Langeheine R et al (2003) Das naturwissenschaftliche Verständnis am Ende der Grundschule. In: Bos W, Lankes EM, Prenzel M (eds.) Erste Ergebnisse aus IGLU. Waxmann, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prenzel M, Artelt C, Baumert J et al. (2007) Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie. Zusammenfassung. Accessed 24.01.2008Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ministerium für Kultus, Jugend und Sport Baden-Württemberg (2004) Bildungsplan 2004. Grundschule. Philipp Reclam Jun., DitzingenGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bröll L, Friedrich J, Oetken M (2007) Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung im Primarbereich?! Eine Untersuchung zur Bedeutung und Realisierung naturwissenschaftlicher Inhalte in der Grundschule. PdN-ChiS 6: 36–41Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6. Accessed 14.01.2008
  7. 7. Accessed 14.01.2008Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruner JS (1971) Toward a Theory of Instruction. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lipowsky F (2004) Was macht Fortbildungen für Lehrkräfte erfolgreich? Befunde der Forschung und mögliche Konsequenzen für die Praxis. Die Deutsche Schule 4: 462–479Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84: 191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bandura A (1992) Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism. In: Schwarzer R (ed.) Self-efficacy: Thought Control of Action. Hemisphere, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Bröll
    • 1
  • J. Friedrich
    • 1
  • M. Oetken
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Education Freiburg, Institute for Biology, Chemistry, Geography and PhysicsFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations