Advertisement

Laboratory Courses in Organic Chemistry: A Case Study

  • L. Ravishankar
  • S. Ladage
Chapter

Abstract

The laboratory courses in chemistry at tertiary level are expected to (i) expose students to experimental techniques and skills, (ii) allow sufficient practice to master these techniques and (iii) also provide opportunities to students as investigators of the experimental work. The present paper discusses and analyses the laboratory courses in organic chemistry, prescribed by Mumbai University, one of the oldest Universities of India for (i) the content, (ii) skills/technical demands of the experiments, (iii) weightage with respect to time and marks, (iv) evaluation criteria used for assessment of students, and (v) the changes it has undergone over time.

Keywords

Core Skill Postgraduate Level Affiliate College Practical Examination Total Mark 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Domin DS (1999) A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles. J Chem Educ 76: 543–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitchell T, Bridge M, Ellis F et al. (1999) Core Practical Skills. www.cpe.fr/ectnassoc/archives/lib/1999/1999_WGR_TeachLearnPractSkills.pdf. Accessed in May 2008
  3. 3.
    Johnstone AH, Al-Shuaili A (2001) Learning in the laboratory: Some Thoughts from the Literature. U Chem Ed 5: 42–51.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abraham MR, Cracolice MS, Graves AP et al (1997) The Nature and State of General Chemistry Laboratory Courses Offered by Colleges and Universities in the United States. J Chem Educ 74: 591–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Montes LD, Rockley MG (2002) Teacher Perceptions in the Selection of Experiments. J Chem Educ 79: 244–247.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaddis BA, Schoffstall AM (2007) Incorporating Guided-Inquiry Learning into the Organic Chemistry Laboratory. J Chem Educ 84: 848–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hollenback JJ, Wixson EN, Geske GD et al (2006) A New Model for Transitioning Students from the Undergraduate Teaching Laboratory to the Research Laboratory. J Chem Educ 83: 1835–1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohrig JR, Hammond CN, Colby DA (2007) On the Successful Use of Inquiry-Driven Experiments in the Organic Chemistry Laboratory. J Chem Educ 84: 992–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vianna JF, Sleet RJ, Johnstone AH (1999) The Use of Mini-Projects in an Undergraduate Laboratory Course in Chemistry. Quimica Nova 22: 138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chittleborough GD, Mocerino M, Treagust DF (2007) Achieving Greater Feedback and Flexibility Using Online Pre-Laboratory Exercises with Non-Major Chemistry Students. J Chem Educ 84: 884–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garratt J (1997) Virtual Investigations: Ways to Accelerate Experience. U Chem Ed 1: 19–27.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    MIT Open Course Ware - http://ocw.mit.edu. Accessed in May 2008
  13. 13.
    Bradley AZ, Ulrich SM, Jones M Jr, Jones SM (2002) Teaching the Sophomore Organic Chemistry Course without a lecture. Are you Crazy? J Chem Educ 79: 514 –519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryV.G.Vaze College of Arts, Science and CommerceMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Homi Bhabha Centre for Science EducationMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations