Advertisement

The Social, Psychological, and Education Sciences: From Educationalization to Pedagogicalization of the Family and the Child

  • Thomas S. Popkewitz
Part of the Educational Research book series (EDRE, volume 3)

This chapter considers the thesis of pedagogicalization through focusing the social and education sciences. Pedagogicalization is spoken about as the expertise of science in ordering what is (im)possible to know and do, creating borders by which experiences are acted upon and the self is located as an actor. The expertise is explored historically through changes in the cultural theses about the modes of life of the child and family: turn of the 20th century educationalization in which the lives of the family and child are rationalized to relate individuality to norms linked to collective, social belonging; and turn of the 21st century pedagogicalization in which the expertise of science focuses on individuality as a seemingly isolated site of continuous innovation and processes of self-evaluation and monitoring bound to networks with no social center.1 In both the past and the present, the cultural theses generated about the family and child, I argue, embody double gestures about the hope of the future and fears about those dangerous to that future and abjected, cast out into unlivable spaces.

Keywords

Lifelong Learner Human Science Social Question American Revolution Progressive Reform 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ariès, P. (1960/1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life (R. Baldick, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bercovitch, S. (1978). The American Jeremiad. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bornstein, M. (1998, April 19–22). Refocusing on parenting. Paper presented at the Parenthood in America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  4. Childs, J. L. (1956). American pragmatism and education: An interpretation and criticism. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  5. David and Lucille Packard Foundation. (2002). Welfare reforms and children. The Future of Children, 12(1).Google Scholar
  6. Depaepe, M. (1997). Differences and similarities in the development of educational psychology in Germany and the United States before 1945. Paedagogica Historica, 33(1), 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1902, 1900/1956). The child and the curriculum, the school, and society. Chicago: Phoenix Books.Google Scholar
  8. Donzelot The policing of families (Foreword by G. Deleuze; Trans. R. Hurley). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  9. Eldridge, D. (2001). Parent involvement: It’s worth the effort. Young Children, 56(3), 65–69.Google Scholar
  10. Ferguson, R. A. (1997). The American enlightenment, 1750–1820. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Foner, E. (1998). The story of American freedom. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  12. Grant, J. (1998). Raising baby by the book. The education of American mothers. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hall, G. S. (1924). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relation to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion, and education (Vol. 1). New York: Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
  14. Hidalgo, N., Siu, S., Bright, J., Swap, S., & Epstein, J. (1995). Research on families, schools, and communities: A multicultural perspective. In J. Banks (Ed.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 498–524). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Joncich, G. M. (1962). Science: Touchstone for a new age in education. In G. M. Joncich (Ed.), Psychology and the science of education. Selected writings of Edward L. Thorndike (pp. 1–26). New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  16. Kristoffersson, M. (n.d.). Parental involvement: Parents new role in Swedish schools. Sweden: Teacher education, Umeå University.Google Scholar
  17. Lareau Unequal childhoods. Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. McKnight, D. (2003). Schooling, the puritan imperative, and the molding of an American national identity. Education’s “errand into the wilderness”. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America’s children. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  21. Nisbet, R. (1979). History of the idea of progress. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Pollock, L. (2001). Parent-child relations. In D. Kertzer & M. Barbagli (Eds.), Family in the early modern times, 1500–1789. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Popkewitz, T. (1991). A political sociology of educational reform: Power/Knowledge in teaching, teacher education, and research. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  24. Popkewitz, T. (2003). Governing the child and pedagogicalization of the parent: A history of the present. In M. Bloch, K. Holmlund, I. Moqvist, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Governing children, families and education. Restructuring the Welfare State (pp. 35–62). New York: Palgrave Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  25. Popkewitz, T. (Ed.) (2005). Inventing the modern self and John Dewey: Modernities and the traveling of pragmatism in education. New York: PalgraveMacmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Popkewitz, T. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Rancière, J. (2004). Who is the subject of the rights of man? The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2/3), 298–310.Google Scholar
  28. Rodgers, D. (1998). Atlantic crossings: Social politics in a progressive age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rothstein, R. (2002, August 7). Schools can use help teaching parents to get involved. New York Times, p. A46.Google Scholar
  30. Simms, P., & Erickson, D. (2002, December 8). Will your children be ready for school?Wisconsin State Journal, pp. A1, A5.Google Scholar
  31. Sklansky, J. (2002). The soul’s economy: Market society and selfhood in American thought, 1820-1920. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  32. Small, A. W. (1896). Demands of sociology upon pedagogy. Paper presented at the National Educational Association Thirty-fifth Annual Meeting, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  33. Steedman, C. (1995). Strange dislocations: Childhood and the idea of human interiority, 1780-1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Thorndike, E. L. (1906/1962). Principles of teaching. In G. M. Joncich (Ed.), Psychology and the science of education. Selected writings of Edward L. Thorndike (pp. 55–69). New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  35. Tough, P. (2006, November 26). What it takes to make a student. New York Times Magazine, Section, pp. 44–51, 69–72, 77.Google Scholar
  36. Tröhler, D. (2005). Langue as homeland: The Genevan reception of pragmatism. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), Inventing the modern self and John Dewey: Modernities and the traveling of pragmatism in education (pp. 61–85). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. US Department of Education. (2001). Family involvement in children’s education: Successful local approaches: An idea book (abridged version). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  38. Wagner, P., Wittrock, B., & Whitley, R. (Eds.). (1991). Discourses on society: The shaping of the social science disciplines. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Wald, P. (1995). Constituting Americans: Cultural anxiety and narrative form. Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar
  40. Ward, L. F. (1883). Dynamic sociology, or applied social science, as based upon statistical sociology and the less complex sciences. New York: D. Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
  41. Watt, J. (2001). The impact of the reformation and counter-reformation. In D. Kertzer & M. Barbagli (Eds.), Family life in the early modern times, 1500–1789. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Weber, M. (1904–1905/1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (Trans. Talcott Parsons). New York: Charles Scribner and Sons.Google Scholar
  43. Wood, G. S. (1991). The radicalism of the American revolution. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas S. Popkewitz
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations