Abstract
In this contribution I argue that the concept of polycentricity that has evolved from the body of literature on governance problems in metropolitan areas (Tiebout, 1956, Ostrom, Tiebout, & Warren, 1961, Marks & Hooghe, 2003, Frey & Eichenberger, 1999) may not be easily adapted to address current governance problems in the rural areas of the EU-27. The chapter explores some of the likely limits of the concept in the context of rural development in the European Union. I first explore the foundations of the concept of polycentricity, along with its assumptions and theoretical conclusions. I then characterize typical contemporary problems in the rural areas of the EU after the enlargement from EU-15 to EU-27. I then show that phenomena like rural poverty, local budget crises, and scale economies in service provision in areas like health-care, infrastructure and education lead to situations where the assumptions of multi-level governance are not met. Finally, I draw a few theoretical and practical conclusions, which are in line with the basic tenets of the concept of polycentricity, about the potential of cooperatives for solving governance problems in the rural areas of the European Union.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Birchall, J. (2005). Co-operative principles ten years on. Review of International Co operation, 98, 45–63.
Bonus, H. (1986). The cooperative association as a business enterprise: A study in the economics of transactions. Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge, 81, Münster: Institut für Genossenschaftswesen.
Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, New Series, 32, 1–14.
Buchenrieder, G., & Knüpfer, J. (2002). Ländliche Armut in Transformationsökonomien: Wirtschaften ohne ausserlandwirtschaftliches Einkommen. In M. Brockmeier et al. (Eds), Liberalisierung des Weltagrarhandels: Strategien und Konsequenzen (pp. 353–364). Münster-Hiltrup: Landwirtschaftsverlag.
Cavazzani, A., & Moseley, M. (Eds.). (2001). The practice of rural development partnerships in Europe: 24 case studies in six European countries. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
Clark, L. (1943). Credit unions in the United States. The Journal of Business of the University of Chicago, 16, 235–246.
Cloke, P., Milbourne, P , & Thomas, C. (1997). Living lives in different ways? Deprivation, marginalization and changing lifestyles in rural England. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 22, 210–230.
Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405.
Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.
Edwards, B., Goodwin, M., Pemberton, S., & Woods, M. (2000). Partnership working in rural regeneration. Bristol: Policy Press.
Eisen, A. (2002). Die Genossenschaft ist ein Zukunftsmodell: Neue Genossenschaften und neue Perspektiven für genossenschaftliche Lösungen. In M. Hanisch (Ed.), Genossenschaftsmodelle zwischen Auftrag und Anpassung (pp. 201–218). Berlin: Institut für Genossenschaftswesen.
European Commission. (2005). Fact sheet: New perspectives for EU rural development. Brussels: European Commission, from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/fact/index_en.htm.
European Commission. (2006). Employment in rural areas: Closing the jobs gap. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. EC Reference: COM (2006) 857 final, Brussels, from: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/reports/ruralemployment/com857_en.pdf.
European Commission. (2007). Territorial agenda of the European Union: Towards a more sustainable and competitive Europe of diverse regions, from: www.cor.europa.eu/COR_cms/ui/ViewDocument.aspx?siteid=default&contentID=4c3c41dc-7d16-48fd-87f-a8317c0f3667
Fairbairn, B. (1994). History from the ecological perspective: Gaia theory and the problem of cooperatives in turn-of-the-century Germany. The American Historical Review, 99, 1203–1239.
Faust, H. (1965). Geschichte der Genossenschaftsbewegung: Ursprung und Weg der Genossenschaften im deutschen Sprachraum. Frankfurt am Main: Knapp.
Frey, B. S., & Eichenberger, R. (1999). The new democratic federalism for Europe: Functional, overlapping and competing jurisdictions. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Frey, B. S., Luechinger, S., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Valuing public goods: The life satisfaction approach. Working Paper No. 184, University of Zurich, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics.
Goodwin, M. (2004). Rural governance: A review of relevant literature. Paper prepared for ESRC, Countryside Agency and DEFRA. Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences.
Guinnane, T. W. (2001). Cooperatives as information machines: German rural credit cooperatives, 1883–1914. The Journal of Economic History, 61, 366–389.
Hagedorn, K., & Hanisch, M. (2005, August). Institutions of sustainability and the concept of integrative and segregative institutions. Paper presented at the 99th seminar of the EAAE – European Association of Agricultural Economists, Copenhagen.
Hanisch, M. (2006). Eine Theorie genossenschaftlichen Wandels. In H.-H. Münkner, G. Ringle (Eds.), Zukunftsperspektiven für Genossenschaften: Bausteine für typengerechte Weiterentwicklung (pp. 297–323). Bern: Haupt.
Hayami, Y., & Otsuka, K. (1993). The economics of contract choice: An agrarian perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Henkel, G. (2004). Der Ländliche Raum: Gegenwart und Wandlungsprozesse seit dem 19. Jahrhundert in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Borntraeger.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Response to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1980). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Further reflections and a survey of recent contributions. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 58, 430–453.
Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.
Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2003). Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multilevel governance. American Political Science Review, 97, 233–243.
NIAE (2004). The future of rural areas in the CEE new member states: Network of independent agricultural experts in the CEE candidate countries. Halle: IAMO.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Orbell, J. M., & Uno, T. (1972). A theory of neighborhood problem-solving: Political action versus residential mobility. American Political Science Review, 66, 471–489.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005, June). The complexity of collective action theory. Paper presented at the conference "Analyzing problems of polycentric governance in the growing EU", Berlin.
Ostrom, V. (2004). Polycentricity. In V. Ostrom (Ed.), The meaning of American federalism: Constituting a self-governing society (pp. 198–232). San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
Ostrom, V. (1972, September). Polycentricity. Paper presented at 1972 Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1994). Public goods and public choices: The emergence of public economies and industry structures. In V. Ostrom (Ed.), The meaning of American federalism: Constituting a self-governing society (pp. 162–197). San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas. American Political Science Review, 55, 831–842.
Peters B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 8, 223–243.
Post, D. (2002). Closing the deception gap: Accession to the European Union and environmental standards in East Central Europe dynamics of regulatory change: How globalization affects national regulatory policies. UCIAS Edited Volume 1, Year 2002, Article 5.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.
Sandler, T., & Tschirhart, J. T. (1980). The economic theory of clubs: An evaluative survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 18, 1481–1521.
Sikor, T. (2008). (Ed.). Public and private in natural resource governance: A false dichotomy? London: Earthscan.
Tagungsbericht Armut und ländliche Gesellschaften (2006, October). Zwischen Tradition und Moderne: Philanthropie und Selbsthilfe in Europa, 1850–1930. Tagung, Trier, from: http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/tagungsberichte/id=1400.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–24.
Todev, T., Rönnebeck, G., & Brazda, J. (1994). Perversion einer Idee. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Tullock, G. (1967). Toward a mathematics of politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Williams, O. P. (1971). Metropolitan political analysis. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1990). Die ökonomischen Institutionen des Kapitalismus: Unternehmen, Märkte, Kooperationen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hanisch, M. (2009). Constraints on Rural Governance in the European Union: A Role for Co-operative Associations?. In: Beckmann, V., Padmanabhan, M. (eds) Institutions and Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9690-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9690-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9689-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9690-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)