Abstract
Paavola and Adger (2005) claim that ecological economics could benefit from institutional economics when analysing environmental governance. One aspect they focus on is the discussion about motivational and cognitive assumptions in institutional economics. This paper deepens this focus, explaining in theoretical terms what it means to include cognition in our institutional analysis and presenting the main theoretical approaches on this topic within institutional economics. A short comparison is made between two approaches, one by Douglass North and the other by Daniel Bromley. The paper argues that, even if traditionally the differences between the old and the new institutionalisms have been substantial, in relation to recent developments they are becoming a lot closer. Especially if we compare the role of mental models as seen by Douglass North with the arguments made by Daniel Bromley about sufficient reason, the two approaches can be seen as complementary and could fructify each other. Particularly if we draw the methodological implications of these two theoretical approaches, we see that both require the use of qualitative data in order to understand mental models or forms of sufficient reason. Some qualitative data is used to demonstrate what it means to apply the approaches empirically.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adger, N. W., Brown, K., Fairbrass, J., Jordan, A., Paavola, J., Rosendo, S., et al. (2003). Governance for sustainability: Towards a ‘thick’ analysis of environmental decisionmaking. Environmental Planning A, 35, 1095–1110.
Alchian, A. A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211–221.
Beckenbach, F. (2001). Beschränkte Rationalität und Systemkomplexität. Marburg: Metropolis.
Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1994). Investing in cultural capital for sustainable use of natural capital. In A. Jansson, M. Hammer, C. Folke, & R. Constanza (Eds.), Investing in natural capital(pp. 128–149). Washington: Island Press.
Bleischwitz, R. (2003). Cognitive and institutional perspectives of eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics,46, 453–467.
Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets on other economic institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 75–111.
Bromley, D. W. (1989). Economic interests and institutions: The conceptual foundations of public policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bromley, D. W. (1991). Environment and economy: Property rights and public policy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bromley, D. W. (1992). The commons, property, and common-property regimes. In D. W. Bromley (Ed.), Making the commons work(pp. 3–16). San Fransisco: ICS Press.
Bromley, D. W. (1996). The social construction of land. In K. Hagedorn (Ed.), Institutioneller Wandel und Politische Ökonomie von Landwirtschaft und Agrarpolitik. Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Günther Schmitt(pp. 21–46). Frankfurt: Campus.
Bromley, D. W. (2001). Searching for sustainability: The poverty of spontaneous order. In C. J. Cleveland, D. I. Stern, & R. Constanza (Eds.), The economic of nature and the nature of economics(pp. 74–88). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Bromley, D. W. (2006a). Sufficient reason: Volitional pragmatism and the meaning of economic institutions.Princeton: University Press.
Bromley, D. W. (2006b, – Mai). Towards an Ordnungstheorie: Volitional pragmatism and economic institutions. Paper presented in the economic policy seminars of Albert- Ludwigs-University, Freiburg.
Common, M., & Stagl, S. (2005). Ecological economics: An introduction.Cambridge: University Press.
Constanza, R. (1991). Ecological economics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2005). From bioprospecting to reflexive governance. Ecological Economics, 53, 473–491.
Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models, ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, 47, 1–31.
Dequech, D. (2006). The new institutional economics and the theory of behaviour under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 59, 109–131.
Frey, B. (1997). Markt und Motivation: Wie ökonomische Anreize die (Arbeits-)Moral verdrängen.München: Vahlen.
Frey, B., & Schneider, F. (1997). Warum wird die Umweltökonomik kaum angewendet? Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, 2, 153–170.
Geertz, C. (1987). Dichte Beschreibung; Beiträge zum Verstehen kultureller Systeme. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Hagedorn, K. (1992). Das Leitbild des bäuerlichen Familienbetriebes in der Agrarpolitik der 1970er und 1980er Jahre. Zeitschrift für Agrargeschichte und Agrarsoziologie, 40, 53–86.
Hagedorn, K. (1996). Das Institutionenproblem in der agrarökonomischen Politikforschung. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck).
Handlbauer, G. (2000). Decision-making and institutionalised cognition. In M. Streit, U. Mummert, & D. Kiwit (Eds.), Cognition, rationality and institutions(pp. 161–180). Berlin: Springer.
Hiedanpää, J., & Bromley, D. W. (2002). Environmental policy as a process of reasonable valuing. In D. Bromley & J. Paavola (Eds.), Economics, ethics, and environmental policy(pp. 69–83). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodgson, G. M. (1993a). Economics and evolution. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hodgson, G. M. (1993b). Institutional economics: Surveying the ‘old’ and the ‘new’. Metroeconomica, 44, 1–28.
Hodgson, G. M. (1998). The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 166–192.
Hodgson, G. M. (2007). Evolutionary and institutional economics as the new mainstream?Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 4, 7–25.
Holland, J. H. (1996). The rationality of adaptive agents. In K. J. Arrow (Ed.), The rational foundations of economic behaviour(pp. 281–297).New York: St Martin’s Press.
Holland, A. (2002). Are choices tradeoffs. In D. W. Bromley & J. Paavola (Eds.), Economics,ethics, and environmental policy(pp. 18–34). Oxford: Blackwell.
Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hotimsky, S., Cobb, R., & Bond, A. (2006). Contracts or scripts? A critical review of the application of institutional theories to the study of environmental change. Ecology and Society,11, 41.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, C. (2004). Uncommon ground: The ‘poverty of history’ in common property discourse. Development & Change, 35, 407–433.
Kant, S., & Berry, A. R. (2005). Sustainability, institutions, and forest management. In S. Kant & A. R. Berry (Eds.), Institutions, sustainability, and natural resources: Institutionsfor sustainable forest management(pp. 1–20). Doordrecht: Springer.
Knight, J. (2000). Suboptimality and social institutions: The relationship between cognition and context. In M. Streit, U. Mummert, & D. Kiwit (Eds.), Cognition, rationality and institutions(pp. 11–26). Berlin: Springer.
Knight, J., & North, D. (1997). Explaining economic change: The interplay between cognition and institutions. Legal Theory, 3, 211–226.
Koch, M. (2008). Institutioneller Wandel in der Forstwirtschaft: Zur Bedeutung von mentalen Modellen, Vertrauen und Verhandlungsmacht – dargestellt am Fallbeispiel Allgäuer Kleinprivatwald. Dissertation der Fakultät für Forst- und Umweltwissenschaften, Freiburg.
Lakatos, I. (1982). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lamnek, S. (1995). Qualitative Sozialforschung: Methodologie. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
Lenger, A. (2005). Institutions, culture and history in environmental economics. Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Abteilung für Wirtschaftspolitik.
Lindenberg, S. (1985). Rational choice and sociological theory: New pressures on cconomics as a social science. JITE, 141, 244–255.
Loasby, B. J. (2002). Evolution and institutions: A cognitive perspective. East-West Journal of Economics and Business, 5, 27–45.
Madsen, L. M. (2003). New woodlands in Denmark: The role of private landowners. Urban-Forestry-and-Urban-Greening, 1, 185–195.
North, D. C. (1988). Theorie des institutionellen Wandels. Tübingen: J C B Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. (1992). Theorie des institutionellen Wandels. Tübingen: J C B Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. American Economic Review, 84, 359–368.
North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
O’Neill, J. (2004). Ecological economics and the politics of knowledge: The debate between Hayek and Neurath. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, 431–447.
Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association. The American Political Science Review, 92, 1–22.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Paavola, J. (2002). Rethinking the choice and performance of environmental policies. In D. W. Bromley & J. Paavola (Eds.), Economics, ethics, and environmental policy (pp. 88–102). Oxford: Blackwell.
Paavola, J., & Adger, W. N. (2005). Institutional ecological economics. Ecological economics, 53, 353–368.
Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2004). Conceptual consistency and data comparability: Methodological challenges to empirical research on collective action. Paper prepared for the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 2–5 September 2004, Chicago.
Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2005). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Strategies for building large-N databases based on qualitative research. Paper prepared for the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1–4 September, Washington D.C.
Reichertz, J. (2003). Die Abduktion in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Opladen: Leske & Buderich.
Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (1998). Economics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Schlüter, A. (2001). Institutioneller Wandel und Transformation. Institutioneller Wandel der Landwirtschaft und Ressourcennutzung, Bd. 4. Aachen: Shaker.
Schlüter, A. (2007). Institutional change in the forestry sector: The explanatory potential of new institutional economics. Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 1090–1099.
Schlüter, A., & Phillimore, P. (2005). Rationalising risk: arguing over safety on the Firth of Forth. Focaal – European Journal of Anthropology, 46, 79–90.
Searle, J. R. (2005). What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics, 1, 1–22.
Siebenhühner, B. (2001). Homo sustinens.Marburg: Metropolis.
Söderbaum, P. (1999). Values, ideology and politics in ecological economics. Ecological economics, 28, 161–170.
Spash, C. L. (1995). The political economy of nature. Review of Poltical Economy, 7, 279–293.
Vanberg, V. J. (1994). Rules and choice in economics. London: Routledge.
Vatn, A. (2002). Efficient or fair: Ethical paradoxes in environmental policy. In D. W. Bromley & J. Paavola (Eds.), Economics, ethics, and environmental policy(pp. 148–163). Oxford: Blackwell.
Vatn, A. (2005a). Institutions and the environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Vatn, A. (2005b). Valuing forest ecosystems and institutional perspective. In S. Kant & A. R. Berry (Eds.), Institutions, sustainability, and natural resources: Institutions for sustainable forest management(pp. 115–134). Doordrecht: Springer.
Wilson, J. (2002). Scientific uncertainty, complex systems, and the design of common-pool institutions. In N. R. Council (Ed.), The drama of the commons(pp. 327–360). Washington: National Academic Press.
Ziegenspeck, S., Härdter, U., & Schraml, U. (2004). Lifestyles of private forest owners as an indication of social change. Forest Policy and Economics, 6, 447–458.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schlüter, A. (2009). Institutional Change and Ecological Economics: The Role of Mental Models and Sufficient Reason. In: Beckmann, V., Padmanabhan, M. (eds) Institutions and Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9690-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9690-7_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9689-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9690-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)