Fertility, Living Arrangements, Care and Mobility

  • Dylan Kneale
  • Ernestina Coast
  • John Stillwell
Part of the Understanding Population Trends and Processes book series (UPTA, volume 1)

Demographic change constitutes one of the most important challenges of the twenty-first century. Population ageing has become the focus of attention for analysts seeking to establish its causes and consequences and policy makers charged with responding to its implications. The proportion of older people is expanding dramatically due to declining fertility and improving mortality.


Labour Market Living Arrangement Demographic Transition Dependency Ratio Labour Market Participation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alders, M.P.C. and Manting, D. (2001) Household scenarios for the European Union, 1995–2025, Genus, LVII(2): 17–48.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, G., Hawker, S. and Crow, G. (2001) Family diversity and change in Britain and Western Europe, Journal of Family Issues, 22(7): 819–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appleyard, R. (1998) Emigration Dynamics in Developing Countries Volume 1–3 Sub-Saharan Africa; Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean; South Asia and the Arab Region, UNFPA and IOM, Ashgate, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  4. Axinn, W. G. and Thornton, A. (2000) The Transformation in the Meaning of Marriage, in Waite, L., Bachrach, C., Hindin, M., Thomson, E. and Thornton, A. (eds.) Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 147–165.Google Scholar
  5. Barlow, A. (ed.) (2005) Cohabitation, Marriage and the Law: Social Change and Legal Reform in the 21st Century, Oxford, Portland OR, Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Bengston, V., Marti, G. and Roberts, R. (1991) Age group relations: generational equity and inequity, in Pillemer, K. and McCartney, K (eds.) Parent-Child Relations Across the Lifespan, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillside (NJ), pp. 253–278.Google Scholar
  7. Berrington, A.M. (2004) Perpetual postponers? Women’s, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour, Population Trends, 117: 9–19.Google Scholar
  8. Berrington, A. and Diamond, I. (2000) Marriage or cohabitation: a competing risks analysis of first-partnership formation among the 1958 British birth cohort, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 163(2): 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Binstock, G. and Thornton, A. (2003) Separations, reconciliations, and living apart in cohabiting and marital unions, Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2): 432–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bledsoe, C.E. (2006) The demography of family reunification: from circulation to substitution in Gambian Spain, MPIDR Working Paper No 2006–053, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock.Google Scholar
  11. Borjas, G. (2004) Increasing the supply of labour through immigration: measuring the impact of native-born workers, CES Working Paper No 504,
  12. Bradley, D. (2001) Regulation of unmarried cohabitation in west-European jurisdictions – determinants of legal policy, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15(1): 22–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckner, L. and Yeandle, S. (2006) More than a Job Working Carers: Evidence from the 2001 Census, Carers UK, London. Available from:
  14. Buckner, L. and Yeandle, S. (2007) Care and Caring in EU Member States, Carers UK, London.Google Scholar
  15. Bumpass, L.L., Raley, R.K. and Sweet, J.A. (1995) The changing character of stepfamilies: implications of cohabitation and nonmarital childbearing, Demography, 32(3): 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Champion, A.G. (2005) Population movement within the UK, in Chappell, R. (ed.) Focus on People and Migration 2005 Edition, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 91–113.Google Scholar
  17. Collyer, M. (2004) The development impact of temporary international labour migration on southern Mediterranean sending countries, Working Paper T6, Sussex Centre for Migration Research, University of Susses, Brighton.Google Scholar
  18. Coombes, M.G. and Raybould, S. (2001) Commuting in England and Wales: ‘people’ and ‘place’ factors, European Research in Regional Science, 11(1): 111–133.Google Scholar
  19. Coontz, S. (2004) The world historical transformation of marriage, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4): 974–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coyle, A. (2005) Changing times: flexibilization and the re-organization of work in feminized labour markets, Sociological Review, 53: 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Darroch, J.E., Landry, D.J. and Oslak, S. (1999) Pregnancy rates among US women and their partners in 1994, Family Planning Perspectives, 31: 122–126+136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Graaf, P.M. and Kalmijn, M. (2003) Alternative routes in the remarriage market: competing-risk analyses of union formation after divorce, Social Forces, 81(4): 1459–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Jong Gierveld, J. (2004) Remarriage, unmarried cohabitation, living apart together: partner relationships following bereavement or divorce, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(1): 236–243.Google Scholar
  24. De Vaus, D, Qu, L. and Weston, R. (2005) The disappearing link between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability, 1970–2001, Journal of Population Research, 22(2): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dennett, A. and Stillwell, J. (2008) Internal migration in Great Britain – a district level analysis using 2001 Census data, Working Paper 01/08, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds.Google Scholar
  26. Dennett, A., Stillwell, J. and Duke-Williams, O. (2007) Interaction data sets in the UK: an audit, Working Paper 07/03, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds.Google Scholar
  27. Dex, S, Joshi, H, Macaran, S. and McCulloch, A. (1998) Employment after childbearing and women's subsequent labour force participation: evidence from the British 1958 birth cohort, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60: 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duncan, G. J, Wilkerson, B. and England P. (2006) Cleaning up their act: The effects of marriage and cohabitation on licit and illicit drug use, Demography, 43(4): 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dush, C.M.K. and Amato, P.R. (2005) Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5): 607–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dustmann, C, Fabbri, F, Preston, I. and Wadsworth, J. (2003) The Local Labour Market Effects of Immigration in the UK, Home Office Online Report 06/03, London.Google Scholar
  31. Edwards, M.E. (2002) Education and occupations: reexamining the conventional wisdom about later first births among American mothers, Sociological Forum, 17: 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eekelaar, J. and Maclean, M. (2004) The obligations and expectations of couples within families: three modes of interaction, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 26(2): 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eggebeen, D.J. (2005) Cohabitation and exchanges of support, Social Forces, 83(3): 1097–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Elizabeth, V. (2000) Cohabitation, marriage, and the unruly consequences of difference, Gender and Society, 14(1): 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Elliott, J. (2005) Using Narrative in Social Research, SAGE Publications Limited, London.Google Scholar
  36. Ermisch, J. and Francesconi, M. (2000) The increasing complexity of family relationships: lifetime experience of lone motherhood and stepfamilies in Great Britain, European Journal of Population, 16(3): 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ESRC (2006) Changing Household and Family Structures and Complex Living Arrangements, Economic and Social Research Council. Swindon.Google Scholar
  38. Eurostat (2004) EUROPOP 2004 – Summary Note on Assumptions and Methodology for International Migration, Working Paper for the Ageing Working Group on the EPC, ESTAT/F1-/POP/19(2004)/GL, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  39. Ewens, D. (2005) The national and London pupil datasets: an introductory briefing for researchers and research users, Data Management and Analysis Group, Greater London Authority.Google Scholar
  40. Fischer, P, Martin, R. and Straubhaar, T. (1997) Interdependencies between development and migration, in Hammar, T., Brochmann, G., Tamas, K. and Faist, T. (eds.) International Migration, Immobility and Development: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Berg Publishers, Oxford.Google Scholar
  41. Flood, M. (2007) Involving men in gender policy and practice, Critical Half: Bi-Annual Journal of Women for Women International, 5: 9–15.Google Scholar
  42. Flowerdew, R. and Hamad, A. (2004) The relationship between marriage, divorce and migration in a British data set, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(2): 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Frost, M. and Shepherd, J. (2004) New methods of assessing service provision in rural England, in Stillwell, J. and Clarke, G. (eds.) Applied GIS and Spatial Analysis, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  44. Gibson-Davis, C.M, Edin, K. and McLanahan, S. (2005) High hopes but even higher expectations: the retreat from marriage among low-income couples, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67(5): 1301–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Giddens, A. J. (1993) The Transformation of Intimacy: Love, Sexuality and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  46. Gillis, J. (2004) Marriages of the mind, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4): 988–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Glaser, K, Askahm, J. et al. (2005) Married or single: which shall I tick? Findings from a Study of BHPS Marital Status Data, BHPS 2005 Conference, Colchester.Google Scholar
  48. Gonzalez, M.-J. and Jurado-Guerrero, T. (2006) Remaining childless in affluent economies: a comparison of France, West Germany, Italy and Spain, 1994–2004, European Journal of Population, 22: 317–352.Google Scholar
  49. Goodman, A, Kaplan, G. and Walker, I. (2004) Understanding the effects of early motherhood in Britain: the effects on mothers, IFS Working Paper 04/18, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
  50. Greene, M.E. and Biddlecom, A.E. (2000) Absent and problematic men: demographic accounts of male reproductive histories, Population and Development Review, 26: 81–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Guzzo, K.B. (2006) The relationship between life course events and union formation, Social Science Research, 35(2): 384–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hadfield, L., Rudoe, N. and Sanderson-Mann, J. (2007) Motherhood, choice and the British media: a time to reflect, Gender and Education, 19: 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hall, S.S. (2006) Marital meaning: exploring young adults’ belief systems about marriage, Journal of Family Issues, 27(10): 1437–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Harden, A., Brunton, G., Fletcher, A., Oakley, A., Burchett, H. and Backhans, M. (2006) Young people, pregnancy and social exclusion: A systematic synthesis of research evidence to identify effective, appropriate and promising approaches for prevention and support, The Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), University of London, London.Google Scholar
  55. Harland, K. and Stillwell, J. (2007a) Commuting to school in Leeds: how useful is the PLASC? Working Paper 07/02, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds.Google Scholar
  56. Harland, K. and Stillwell, J. (2007b) Using PLASC data to identify patterns of commuting to school, residential migration and movement between schools in Leeds, Working Paper 07/03, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds.Google Scholar
  57. Haskey, J. (2001) Demographic aspects of cohabitation in Great Britain, International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family, 15(1): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Heuveline, P. and Timberlake, J.M. (2004) The role of cohabitation in family formation: the United States in comparative perspective, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5): 1214–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Holzmann, R. and Münz, R. (2004) Challenges and Opportunities of International Migration for the EU, Its Member States, Neighbouring Countries and Regions: A Policy Note, World Bank, Washington DC and Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  60. Hotz, V. J., MCelroy Williams, S. and Sanders, S.G. (2004) Teenage Childbearing and Its Lifecycle Consequences: Exploiting a Natural Experiment, Department of Economics, University of California (UCLA), Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  61. Hunter, J. (2005). Report on Cognitive Testing of Cohabitation Questions. Study Series Report: Survey Methodology #2005-06, U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Research Division: 18.Google Scholar
  62. Imamura, M., Tucker, J., Hannaford, P., Oliveira Da Silva, M., Astin, M., Wyness, L., Bloemenkamp, K.W.M., Jahn, A., Karro, H., Olsen, J. and Temmermen, M. (2007) Factors associated with teenage pregnancy in the European Union countries: a systematic review, European Journal of Public Health, 17: 630–636.Google Scholar
  63. Jamieson, L., Anderson, M., McCrone, D., Bechhofer, F., Stewart, R., and Li, Y (2002) Cohabitation and commitment: partnership plans of young men and women, Sociological Review, 50(3): 356–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jefferies, J. (2005) The UK Population: Past, Present and Future. Focus on People and Migration, Office for National Statistics, London.Google Scholar
  65. Jones and Elias, P. (2006) Administrative data as research resources: a selected audit, Working Paper, Warwick Institute for Employment Research, Warwick.Google Scholar
  66. Joshi, H. (2002) Production, reproduction, and education: women, children and work in a British perspective, Population and Development Review, 28: 445–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Joshi, H. (2007) Social Polarisation in Reproduction. From Boom to Bust: Fertility, Ageing and Demographic Change, CentreForum, London.Google Scholar
  68. Kapur, D. and McHale, J. (2005) Give Us Your Best and Brightest: the Global Hunt for talent and its Impact on the Developing World, Center for Global Development, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  69. Kenney, C.T. and McLanahan, S.S. (2006) Why are cohabiting relationships more violent than marriages? Demography, 43(1): 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kiernan, K. (2000) European perspectives on union formation, in Waite, L. (ed.) The Ties that Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 40–58.Google Scholar
  71. Kiernan, K. (2001) The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in western Europe, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Knab, J. and McLanahan, S. (2006) Measuring cohabitation: does how, when and who you ask matter? in Hofferth, S.L. and Casper, L.M. (eds.) Handbook of Measurement Issues in Family Research, Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, New Jersey, pp. 19–33.Google Scholar
  73. Lampard, R. and Peggs, K. (1999) Repartnering: the relevance of parenthood and gender to cohabitation and remarriage among the formerly married, British Journal of Sociology, 50(3): 443–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lauster, N.T. (2006) A room of one's own or room enough for two? Access to housing and new household formation in Sweden, 1968–1992, Population Research and Policy Review. 25(4): 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Lehrer, E.L. (2004) The role of religion in union formation: an economic perspective, Population Research and Policy Review, 23(2): 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lesthaeghe, R. and Moors, G. (1995) Living arrangements and parenthood: do values matter? in de Moor, R.A. (ed.) Values in Western Societies, Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, pp. 217–250.Google Scholar
  77. Lesthaeghe, R. and Neels, K. (2002) From the first to the second demographic transition - an interpretation of the spatial continuity of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland, European Journal of Population, 18(4): 225–260.Google Scholar
  78. Levin (2004) Living apart together: a new family form, Current Sociology, 52(2): 223–240.Google Scholar
  79. Lewis, J. and Campbell, M. (2007) UK work/family balance policies and gender equality 1997–2005, Social Politics, 14: 4–30.Google Scholar
  80. Levitt, P. (2006) Transnational migration: conceptual and policy challenges, in Tamas, K. and Palme, J. (eds.) Globalising Migration Regimes: New Challenges to Transnational Cooperation, Ashgate, Avebury.Google Scholar
  81. Lewis, J. (1999) Marriage, Cohabitation and the Law: Individualism and Obligation, Lord Chancellor’s Department, London.Google Scholar
  82. Lewis, J. (2001a) Debates and issues regarding marriage and cohabitation in the British and American literature, International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family, 15(1): 159–184.Google Scholar
  83. Lewis, J. (2001b) The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relations, E Elgar Pub, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  84. Lewis, J. and Campbell, M. (2007) UK work/family balance policies and gender equality 1997–2005, Social Politics, 14: 4–30.Google Scholar
  85. Liefbroer, A.C. and Dourleijn, E. (2006) Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries, Demography, 43(2): 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. MacLean, M. and Eekelaar J. (2004) The obligations and expectations of couples within families: three modes of interaction, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 26(2): 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Mahay, J. and Lewin, A.C. (2007) Age and the desire to marry, Journal of Family Issues, 28(5): 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Manning, W.D., Longmore, M.A. and Giordano, P.C. (2007) The changing institution of marriage: adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry, Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3): 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Manning, W.D. and Smock, P.J. (2005) Measuring and modeling cohabitation: new perspectives from qualitative data, Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4): 989–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Manting, D. (1996) The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage, European Sociological Review, 12(1): 53–65.Google Scholar
  91. Marcussen, K. (2005) Explaining differences in mental health between married and cohabiting individuals, Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(3): 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Massey, D., Arango, J, Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pelegrino, A. and Taylor, J. (1998) Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millenium, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  93. Mastekaasa, A. (2006) Is marriage/cohabitation beneficial for young people? Some evidence on psychological distress among Norwegian college students, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16(2): 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Morgan, P.M. (2000) Marriage-lite: The Rise of Cohabitation and its Consequences, Institute for the Study of Civil Society, London.Google Scholar
  95. Murphy, M. (2000) Cohabitation in Britain, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 163(2): 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Musick, K. (2007) Cohabitation, nonmarital childbearing, and the marriage process, Demographic Research, 16(9): 249–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Office for National Statistics (2007) Live births: age of mother, 1961 onwards (England and Wales), Health Statistics Quarterly, 37: 36.Google Scholar
  98. Oppenheimer, V.K. (2003) Cohabiting and marriage during young men's career-development process, Demography, 40(1): 127–149.Google Scholar
  99. Osborne, C. (2005) Marriage following the birth of a child among cohabiting and visiting parents, Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1): 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Phillipson, C. (1998) Reconstructing Old Age: New Agendas in Social Theory and Practice, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  101. Pleck, J.H. (2007) Why could father involvement benefit children? Theoretical perspectives, Applied Developmental Science, 11: 196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Poot, J., Gorter, C. and Nijkamp, P. (eds.) (1998) Crossing Borders: Regional and Urban Perspectives on International Migration, Ashgate, Aldershot UK.Google Scholar
  103. Power, C. and Elliott, J. (2006) Cohort profile: 1958 British birth cohort (National Child Development Study), International Journal of Epidemiology, 35: 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Probert, R. (2004) Cohabitation in twentieth century England and Wales: law and policy, Law and Policy, 26(1): 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Raley, R.K. (2001) Increasing fertility in cohabiting unions: evidence for the second demographic transition in the United States? Demography, 38(1): 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Reed, J.M. (2006) Not crossing the “extra line": how cohabitors with children view their unions, Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(5): 1117–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Rendall, M.S., Clarke, L., Peters, H.E., Ranjit, N. and Verropoulou, G. (1999) Incomplete reporting of men's fertility in the United States and Britain: a research note, Demography, 36, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Rendall, M.S., Couet, C., Lappegard, T., Robert-Bobee, I., Romsen, M. and Smallwood, S. (2005) First birth by age and education in Britain, France and Norway, Population Trends, 121: 27–34.Google Scholar
  109. Rendall, M.S. and Smallwood, S. (2003) Higher qualifications, first birth timing and further childbearing in England and Wales, Population Trends, 111: 18–27.Google Scholar
  110. Rossi, P. (1955) Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Pschologyof Urban Residential Mobility, Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.Google Scholar
  111. Sarkadi, A., Kristiansson, R., Oberklaid, F. and Bremberg, S. (2008) Fathers’ involvement and children’s developmental outcomes: a systematic review of longitudinal studies, Acta Paediatricia, 97: 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Sassler, S. (2004) The process of entering into cohabiting unions, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2): 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Scott, J. (1999) Family Change: Revolution or Backlash in Attitudes? in McRae, S. (ed.) Changing Britain: Families and households in the 1990s, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 68–99.Google Scholar
  114. Seltzer, J.A. (2000) Families formed outside of marriage, Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4): 1247–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Seltzer, J.A. (2004) Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: demography, kinship, and the future, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4): 921–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Seltzer, J. A., Bachrach, C.A. Bianchi, S.M., Bledsoe, C.H., Casper, L.M., Chase-Lansdale, P.L., et al. (2005) Explaining family change and variation: challenges for family demographers, Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4): 908–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Skeldon, R. (1997) Migration and Development: A Global Perspective, Addison Wells/Longman, Harlow.Google Scholar
  118. Smallwood, S. and Chamberlain, J. (2005) Replacement fertility: What has it been and what does it mean? Population Trends, 119: 16–27.Google Scholar
  119. Smock, P. J. and Manning, W.D. (2004) Living together unmarried in the United States: demographic perspectives and implications for family policy, Law and Policy, 26(1): 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Smock, P. J., Manning, W.D. and Porter, M. (2005) “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors, Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3): 680–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Social Exclusion Unit (1999) Teenage Pregnancy, Social Exclusion Unit, London.Google Scholar
  122. Stafford, L., Kline, S.L., and Rankin, C.T. (2004) Married Individuals, cohabiters, and cohabiters who marry: a longitudinal study of relational and individual well-being, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21: 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Stillwell, J. and Duke-Williams, O. (2003) A new web-based interface to British census of population origin-destination statistics, Environment and Planning A, 35: 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Tamas, K. and Münz, R. (2006) Labour Migrants Unbound? EU Enlargement, Transitional Measures and Labour Market Effects, Institute for Futures Research, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  125. Terry, D.F. and Wilson, S.R. (eds.) (2005) Beyond Small Change: Making Migrant Remittances Count, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  126. Therborn, G. (2007) Is there a future for the family?, Public Policy Research, 14(1): 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Thornton, A., Axinn, W.G. and Xie, Y. (2007) Marriage and Cohabitation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  128. Thornton, A. and Young-DeMarco, L. (2001) Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: the 1960s through the 1990s, Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4): 1009–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Ungerson, C. and Yeandle, S. (eds.) (2007) Cash for Care in Developed Welfare States, Palgrave Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  130. UNICEF (2001) A League Table of Teenage Births in Rich Nations, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.Google Scholar
  131. United Nations (2005) World Population Prospects. The 2004 Revision, UN, NewYork.Google Scholar
  132. Van de Kaa, D.J. (1987) Europe’s second demographic transition, Population Bulletin, 42: 1–59.Google Scholar
  133. Wagner, M. and Weib, B. (2006) On the variation of divorce risks in Europe: findings from a meta-analysis of European longitudinal studies, European Sociological Review, 22(5): 483–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Walker, A. (ed.) (1996) The New Generational Contract: Intergenerational Relations, Old Age and Welfare, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  135. White, N.R. (2003) Changing conceptions: young people’s views of partnering and parenting, Journal of Sociology, 39(2): 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Williams, F. (2004) Trends in women’s employment, domestic service, and female migration: changing and competing patterns of solidarity, in Knijn, T. and Komter, A. (eds.) Solidarity Between the Sexes and Generations: Transformations in Europe, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 210–218.Google Scholar
  137. Yeandle, S. (2007) Carers, employers and the state: clarifying the social contract, Paper presented to the Caregivers: Essential Partners in Care Conference (FICCDAT), Toronto, Canada, 16–19 June.Google Scholar
  138. Yeandle, S., Bennett, C., Buckner, L., Suokas, A. and Shipton, L. (2006a) Who Cares Wins: the Social and Business Benefits of Supporting Employed Carers, Carers UK, London.Google Scholar
  139. Yeandle, S., Buckner, L. and Shipton, S. (2006b) Local Challenges in Meeting Demand for Domiciliary Care – Synthesis Report, Centre for Social Inclusion, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield.Google Scholar
  140. Zimmermann, A.C. and Easterlin, R.A. (2006) Happily ever after? Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and happiness in Germany, Population and Development Review, 32(3): 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education, University of LondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Social PolicyLondon School of EconomicsUK
  3. 3.School of Geography, University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations