Advertisement

Ecological impacts of non-indigenous invasive fungi as forest pathogens

Chapter

Abstract

Non-indigenous pathogenic fungi increasingly threaten North American tree species. Ecosystems may be fundamentally changed when abundant tree species are functionally eliminated, as occurred with American chestnut (Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh.). Conversely, changes may be more subtle but still significant and long lasting when populations are lost, or all trees in the larger size classes are killed. Proposed approaches for characterizing the magnitude of ecological impacts use characteristics of both the non-indigenous pathogen and the host species. Impacts are most significant when highly successful invading pathogens attack foundation species, setting in motion a long-lasting cascade of effects on the host and associated species. Such impacts have generally not been well documented at the ecosystem level. Several North American forest tree species have been functionally eliminated or severely reduced by non-indigenous pathogens. Historical invasions, such as that of chestnut blight (Cryphonectria parasitica (Murr.) Bar), caused very significant ecological impacts that will never be completely understood because of lack of quantitative data. Beech bark disease, caused by a combination of an introduced scale insect (Cryptococcus fagisuga Lindinger) and a fungus (Neonectria faginata (Lohman et al.) Castl. & Rossman), is still advancing and provides opportunities for studying ecosystem-level impacts when a major tree species is removed or markedly reduced in abundance from the overstorey. Butternut canker, caused by the fungus, Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum N.B. Nair, Kostichka & Kuntz, has spread throughout the host range, endangering species’ survival. Other non-indigenous invasive fungi such as Cronartium ribicola J.C. Fisch and Phytophthora lateralis Tucker & Milbrath continue to move into new populations, causing high mortality and associated restructuring of these ecosystems. Global trade and environmental change trends will ensure new challenges by non-indigenous fungal pathogens, presenting an urgent need for improved understanding of long-term impacts across ecological systems.

Keywords

Beech bark disease Butternut canker Chestnut blight Dutch elm disease Ecological impacts Invasive fungi Non-indigenous species Pathogen Port-Orford cedar root rot White pine blister rust 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen EA, Humble LM (2002) Non-indigenous species introductions: a threat to Canada’s forests and forest economy. Can J Plant Pathol 24:103–110Google Scholar
  2. Altizer S, Harvell D, Friedle E (2003) Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 18:589–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anagnostakis SL (2001) The effect of multiple importations of pests and pathogens on a native tree. Biol Invasions 3:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson PK, Cunningham AA, Patel NG, Morales FJ, Epstein PR, Daszak P (2004) Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 19:541–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bey CF (1990) American elm. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (tech. coords.) Silvics of North America: 2. Hardwoods. USDA, For Serv, Agric Handbook 654, 877 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Blodgett JT, Sullivan KF (2004) First report of white pine blister rust on Rocky Mountain bristlecone pine. Plant Dis 88:311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bramble WC (1934) Reaction of chestnut bark to invasion by Endothia parasitica. Am J Bot 23:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brasier CM, Buck KW (2001) Rapid evolutionary changes in a globally invading fungal pathogen (Dutch elm disease). Biol Invasions 3:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castello JD, Leopold DJ, Smallidge PJ (1995) Pathogens, patterns, and processes in forest ecosystems. Bioscience 45:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castlebury LA, Rossman AY, Hyten AS (2006) Phylogenetic relationships of Neonectria/Cylindrocarpon on Fagus in North America. Can J Bot 84:1417–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crooks JA (2002) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis CN, Myren DT, Czerwinski EJ (1992) First report of butternut canker in Ontario. Plant Dis 76:972Google Scholar
  13. Desprez-Loustau M, Robin C, Buee M, Courtecuisse R, Garbaye J, Suffert F, Sache I, Rizzo DM (2007) The fungal dimension of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:472–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diamond SJ (2000) Hard mast production before and after the chestnut blight. S J Appl For 24:196–201Google Scholar
  15. DiGregorio LM, Krasny ME, Fahey TJ (1999) Radial growth trends of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) in an Allegheny northern hardwood forest affected by beech bark disease. J Torrey Bot Soc 126:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dukes JS, Mooney HA (2004) Disruption of ecosystem processes in western North America by invasive species. Rev Chil Hist Nat 77:411–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrlich J (1934) The beech bark disease, a Nectria disease of Fagus, following Cryptococcus fagi (Baer.). Can J Res 10:593–692Google Scholar
  18. Ellison AM, Bank MS, Clinton BD, Colburn EA, Elliot K, Ford CR, Foster DR, Kloeppel BD, Knoepp JD, Lovett GM, Mohan J, Orwig DA, Rodenhouse NL, Sobczak WV, Stinson KA, Stone JK, Swan CM, Thompson J, Von Holle B, Webster JR (2005) Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 3:479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Enserink M (1999) Biological invaders sweep in. Science 285:1834–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fahey TJ (1998) Recent changes in an upland forest in south-central New York. J Torrey Bot Soc 125:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Faison EK, Houston DR (2004) Black bear foraging in response to beech bark disease in eastern Vermont. N E Nat 11:387–394Google Scholar
  22. Farrar JL (1995) Trees in Canada. Fitzhenry & Whiteside Ltd. and Canadian Forest Service, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  23. Fleguel VR (1996) A literature review of butternut and the butternut canker. Eastern Ontario Model Forest Information Report 20Google Scholar
  24. Furnier GR, Stolz AM, Mustaphi RM, Ostry ME (1999) Genetic evidence that butternut canker was recently introduced into North America. Can J Bot 77:783–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibbs JN (1978) Intercontinental epidemiology of Dutch elm disease. Ann Rev Phytopathol 16:287–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gibbs JN, Wainhouse D (1986) Spread of forest pests and pathogens in northern hemisphere. Forestry 59:141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goheen EM, Hansen E, Kanaskie A, Osterbauer N, Parke J, Pscheidt J, Chastagner G (2006) Sudden oak death and Phytophthora ramorum: a guide for forest managers, Christmas tree growers, and forest-tree nursery operators in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Extension Service, EM 8877. http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/pdf/em/em8877.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2008
  28. Hansen EM, Goheen DJ, Jules ES, Ullian B (2000) Managing Port-Orford-Cedar and the introduced pathogen Phytophthora lateralis. Plant Dis 84:4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harrison KJ, Hurley JE, Ostry ME (1998) First report of butternut canker caused by Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum in New Brunswick, Canada. Plant Dis 82:1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrison KJ, Hurley JE, MacKay AW, Sabine DL (2005) Expansion of known distribution of butternut canker (Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum) in New Brunswick, 2004. Can Pl Dis Surv 85:123–126Google Scholar
  31. Harvell CD, Mitchell CE, Ward JR, Altizer S, Dobson AP, Ostfeld RS, Samuel MD (2002) Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota. Science 296:2158–2162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hopkins A, Innes L, Harrison KJ (2001) Distribution of butternut canker (Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum) in eastern Canada. Can Pl Dis Surv 81:154–157Google Scholar
  33. Houston DR (1975) Beech bark disease: the aftermath forests are structured for a new outbreak. J For 73:660–663Google Scholar
  34. Houston DR (1985) Spread and increase of Ceratocystis ulmi with cultural characteristics of the aggressive strain in northeastern North America. Plant Dis 69:677–680Google Scholar
  35. Houston DR (1994) Major new tree disease epidemics: beech bark disease. Ann Rev Phytopathol 32:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Houston DR (2005) Beech bark disease: 1934 to 2004: What’s new since Erhlich? In: Evans CA, Lucas JA (eds) Beech bark disease. Proceedings of the beech bark disease symposium. Saranac Lake, NY, 16–18 June 2004. USDA For Ser, NE Res Station, Gen Tech Rep NE-331, pp 2–13Google Scholar
  37. Houston DR, Parker EJ, Perrin R, Lang KJ (1979) Beech bark disease: a comparison of the disease in North America, Great Britain, France, and Germany. Eur J For Path 9:199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hubbes M (1999) The American elm and Dutch elm disease. For Chron 75:265–273Google Scholar
  39. Hutchins HE, Lanner RM (1982) The central role of Clark’s nutcracker in the dispersal and establishment of whitebark pine. Oecologia 55:192–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Innes L (1998) Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum on butternut and black walnut fruit. In: Proceedings of IUFRO Working Party 7.02.02 Meeting, 25–31 May 1997. Quebec City. Laurentian Forestry Centre Inf. Rep. LAU-X-122, pp 129–132Google Scholar
  41. Innes L, Rainville A (1996) Distribution and detection of Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum in Quebec. Phytoprotection 77:5–78Google Scholar
  42. Jakubas WJ, McLaughlin CR, Jensen PG, McNulty SA (2005) Alternate year beechnut production and its influence on bear and marten populations. In: Evans CA, Lucas JA (eds) Beech bark disease. Proceedings of the beech bark disease symposium. Saranac Lake, NY, June 16–18, 2004. USDA For Serv, NE Res Station, Gen Tech Rep NE-331, pp 79–87Google Scholar
  43. Jarosz AM, Davelos AL (1995) Effects of disease in wild plant populations and the evolution of pathogen aggressiveness. New Phytol 129:371–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kendall KC (1995) Whitebark pine: ecosystem in peril. In: LaRoe ET, Farris GS, Puckett CE, Doran PD, Mac MJ (eds) Our living resources: a report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of US plants, animals, and ecosystems. U.S. Department of the Interior, Nat Biol Serv, Washington, pp 228–230Google Scholar
  47. Kinloch BB Jr (2003) White pine blister rust in North America: past and prognosis. Phytopathology 93:1044–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kinloch BB Jr, Dupper GE (2002) Genetic specificity in the white pine – blister rust pathosystem. Phytopathology 92:278–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Koch JL, Carey DW (2005) The genetics of resistance of American beech to beech bark disease: knowledge through 2004. In: Evans CA, Lucas JA, Twery MJ (eds) Beech bark disease. Proceedings of the beech bark disease symposium. 16–18 June 2004, Saranak Lake, NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-331., US Department of Agriculture, For. Serv., NE Research Station, Newton Square, PA, pp 98–105Google Scholar
  50. Krasny ME, Whitmore MC (1992) Gradual and sudden forest canopy gaps in Allegheny northern hardwood forests. Can J For Res 22:139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. LaFlamme G, Hofacker T (2001) How do exotic pests impact forested ecosystems and landscape trees in North America? Exotic forest pests online symposium. http://www.apsnet.org.online/ExoticPest/Papers/laflamme.htm. Accessed 11 Jan 2008
  52. LaFlamme G, Hopkin AA, Harrison KJ (1998) Status of the European race of Scleroderris canker in Canada. For Chron 74:561–566Google Scholar
  53. Langor D W (2007) Status of the limber pine (Pinus flexilis) in Alberta. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Wildlife Status Report No. 62, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  54. Lanner RM (1999) Conifers of California. Cachuma Press, Los OlivosGoogle Scholar
  55. Le Guerrier C, Marceau DJ, Bouchard A, Brisson J (2003) A modelling approach to assess the long-term impact of beech bark disease in northern hardwood forest. Can J For Res 33:2416–2425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Liebhold AM, MacDonald WL, Bergdah D, Mastro VC (1995) Invasion by exotic forest pests: a threat to forest ecosystems. For Sci Monograph 41(2):1–49Google Scholar
  57. Loo JA, Beardmore TL, Simpson JD, McPhee DA (2007) Tree species of concern in New Brunswick, Canada I. Current status and threats. For Chron 83:393–401Google Scholar
  58. Lovett GM, Rueth H (1999) Soil nitrogen transformations in beech and maple stands along a nitrogen deposition gradient. Ecol Appl 9:1330–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lovett GM, Canham CD, Arthur MA, Weathers KC, Fitzhugh RD (2006) Forest ecosystem responses to exotic pests and pathogens in Eastern North America. Bioscience 56:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McDonald GI, Richardson BA, Zambino PJ, Klopfenstein NB, Kim M-S (2006) Pedicularis and Castilleja are natural hosts of Cronartium ribicola in North America: a first report. For Pathol 36:73–82Google Scholar
  62. McKeen CD (1995) Chestnut blight in Ontario: past and present status. Can J Plant Pathol 17:295–304Google Scholar
  63. McNeely JA (2005) The problems with invasive alien species, and implications for GMOs. Collect Biosaf Rev 2:10–35Google Scholar
  64. McNulty SA, Masters RD (2005) Changes to the Adirondack forest: implications of the beech bark disease on forest structure and seed production. In: Evans CA, Lucas JA (eds) Beech bark disease. Proceedings of the beech bark disease symposium. Saranac Lake, NY, 16–18 June 2004. USDA Forest Service, NE Res Station, Gen Tech Rep NE-331, pp 52–57Google Scholar
  65. Millar CI, Kinloch BB Jr, Westfall RD (1996) Conservation of biodiversity in sugar pine: Effects of the blister rust epidemic on genetic diversity. In: Kinloch BB Jr, Marosy M, Huddleston M (eds) Sugar pine: status, values and roles in ecosystems. Univ Calif Div Agric Nat Resour, Publ 3362, pp 190–199Google Scholar
  66. Murray MS, Hansen EM (1997) Susceptibility of Pacific yew to Phytophthora lateralis. Plant Dis 81:1400–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nair VMG, Kostichka CJ, Kuntz JE (1979) Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum: an undescribed species causing canker on butternut. Mycologia 71:641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nelson TC (1955) Chestnut replacement in the southern highlands. Ecology 36(2):352–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Novacek MJ, Cleland EE (2001) The current biodiversity extinction event: scenarios for mitigation and recovery. PNAS 98(10):78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Orwig DA (2002) Ecosystem to regional impacts of introduced pests and pathogens: historical context, questions and issues. J Biogeogr 29:1471–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Osbourne P (1985) Some effects of Dutch elm disease on the birds of a Dorset dairy farm. J Appl Ecol 22:681–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ostrofsky WD, McCormack ML Jr (1986) Silvicultural management of beech and the beech bark disease. N J Appl For 3:89–91Google Scholar
  73. Ostry ME (1995) Conservation of butternut in the Eastern Forests. USDA Forest Service. In: Forest gene conservation principles to practice – workshop proceedings – 008, Ottawa, pp 47–49Google Scholar
  74. Ostry ME (1997) Butternut canker: history, biology, impact and resistance. In: Knowledge for the future of black walnut. Proceedings of the fifth black walnut symposium, 1996. USDA North Central Forest Experimental Station, p 10Google Scholar
  75. Ostry ME (1998) Butternut canker in North American 1967–1997. In: Proceeding IUFRO WP foliage, shoot and stem diseases in forest trees. Quebec City, p 8Google Scholar
  76. Ostry ME, Kastovich S (1997) First report of Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum on black walnut. Plant Dis 81:830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ostry ME, Pijut PM (2000) Butternut: An underused resource in North America. HortTechnol 10:302–306Google Scholar
  78. Ostry ME, Woeste K (2004) Spread of butternut canker in North America, host range, evidence of resistance within butternut populations and conservation genetics. In: Michler CH, Pijut PM, vanSambeek J, Coggeshall M, Seifert J, Woeste K, Overton R (eds) Black walnut: a new century, Proceedings of 6th walnut council research Symposium. 25–28 July, Lafayette, IN. Gen tech Rep NC-243. St. Paul MN USDA For Serv North Central research Station, 188 ppGoogle Scholar
  79. Ostry ME, Mielke ME, Skilling DD (1994) Butternut – strategies for managing a threatened tree. USDA For Serv North Central Forest Experiment Station, Gen Tech Rep NC-165, p 7Google Scholar
  80. Papaik MJ, Canham CD, Latty EF, Woods KD (2005) Effects of an introduced pathogen on resistance to natural disturbance: beech bark disease and windthrow. Can J For Res 35:1832–1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Parker IM, Gilbert GS (2004) The evolutionary ecology of novel plant-pathogen interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 35:675–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invaders 1:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ramirez M, Loo JA, Krasowski M (2007) Evaluation of genetic resistance to the beech scale insect (Cryptococcus fagisuga) and propagation of American beech (Fagus grandifolia) by grafting. Silvae Genet 56:163–169Google Scholar
  85. Renlund DW (1971) Forest pest condition in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Dept Nat Res Ann Rep 1–53Google Scholar
  86. Rhoades CC (2006) The influence of American Chestnut (Castanea dentata) on nitrogen availability, organic matter and chemistry of silty and sandy loam soils. Pedobiologia 50(6):553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Russell EWB (1987) Pre-blight distribution of Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh. Bull Torrey Bot Club 114(2):183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schlarbaum SE, Hebard F, Spaine PC, Kamalay JC (1997) Three American tragedies: chestnut blight, butternut canker, and Dutch elm disease. In: Britton KO (ed) Exotic pests of eastern forests. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Research Station, Asheville, NC. Tennessee Exotic Pest Council, 8–10 April 1997, pp 45–54Google Scholar
  89. Shigo AL (1972) The beech bark disease in the northeastern United States. J For 70:263–269Google Scholar
  90. Sinclair WA, Lyon HH (2005) Diseases of trees and shrubs, 2nd edn. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  91. Smock LA, MacGregor CM (1988) Impact of the American chestnut blight on aquatic shredding macroinvertebrates. J N Am Benthol Soc 7:212–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sniezko RA (2006) Resistance breeding against nonnative pathogens in forest trees–current successes in North America. Can J Plant Pathol 28:S270–S279Google Scholar
  93. Spaulding P (1922) Investigations of the white pine blister rust. USDA Bull No. 957Google Scholar
  94. Storer AJ, Rosemier JN, Beachy BL, Flaspohler DJ (2005) Potential effects of beech bark disease and decline in beech abundance on birds and small mammals. In: Evans CA, Lucas JA (eds) Beech bark disease. Proceedings of the beech bark disease symposium. Saranac Lake, NY, 16–18 June 2004. USDA Forest Service, NE Res Station, Gen Tech Rep NE-331, pp 72–78Google Scholar
  95. Tomback DF, Kramer KA (1980) Limber pine seed harvest by Clark’s nutcracker in the Sierra Nevada: timing and foraging behaviour. Condor 82:467–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Tubbs CH, Houston DR (1990) American beech. In: Burns RM, Barbara H, Honkala BH (tech. coords.) Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture handbook 654. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C., vol 2, 877 ppGoogle Scholar
  97. USDA Forest Service (1979) Butternut dieback. In: Guide to common insects and diseases of forest trees. The Northeastern United States Forest Insect and Disease Management, Northeastern Area State and Private Forests, BroomallGoogle Scholar
  98. Vander Wall SB, Balda RP (1977) Co-adaptations of the Clark’s nutcracker and the piñon pine for efficient seed harvest and dispersal. Ecol Monogr 47:89–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Vitousek PM (1990) Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem processes. Oikos 57:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Sci 84:468–478Google Scholar
  101. Vitousek PM, D’Antonio CM, Loope LL, Rejmanek M, Westbrooks R (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human caused global change. N Z J Ecol 21:1–16Google Scholar
  102. Waldron G (2003) Trees of the Carolinian Forest: a guide to species, their ecology and uses. The Boston Mills Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  103. Walker B, Steffen W (1997) An overview of the implications of global change for natural and managed terrestrial ecosystems. Conserv Ecol [online]1(2):2 http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss2/art2/. Accessed 11 Jan 2008
  104. Witter JA, Stoyenoff JL, Petrillo HA, Yocum JL, Cohen JI (2005) Effects of beech bark disease on trees and ecosystems. In: Evans CA, Lucas JA (eds) Beech bark disease. Proceedings of the beech bark disease symposium, Saranac Lake, NY, 16–18 June 2004. USDA Forest Service, NE Res Station, Gen Tech Rep NE-331, pp 28–35Google Scholar
  105. Woods FW, Shanks RE (1959) Natural replacement of chestnut by other species in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Ecology 40:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zobel DB (1990) Port-Orford-Cedar. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (tech coords) Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers. USDA, For Serv, Agric Handbook 654Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service – Atlantic Forestry CentreFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations