Advertisement

Learning About the Social Elements of Adaptive Management in the South Island Tussock Grasslands of New Zealand

  • Will Allen
  • Chris Jacobson

Adaptive management initiatives are frequently used in multi-stakeholder situations. The more immediate barriers to success in these cases are proving to be organizational and social. We use a case study set in the South Island tussock grasslands of New Zealand to reflect on some of the social elements required to support ongoing collaborative monitoring and adaptive management. We begin by siting the case study within its wider policy context to show how this influences the choice and application of scientific inquiry. The next section concentrates particularly on the processes by which information and knowledge are shared across the different stakeholder groups involved. Finally, we expand on some specific lessons that emerge as important for sharing information and knowledge in adaptive management, including tools to support dialogue and improved tools for evaluation.

Keywords

Collaborative Learning Natural Resource Management Adaptive Management Sustainable Land Management Social Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abinader, S. and Associates (2004) Evaluation report of the Senate Bill 702 Expert Working Group process and initial outcomes. Available on-line http://www.catracking.com/resources/ewg/sb702_evaluation_report.pdf (Downloaded 2 December 2008)
  2. Albinus, M.P., Makalle, J.O., & Yazidhi B. (2008) Effects of land use practices on livelihoods in the transboundary sub-catchments of the Lake Victoria Basin. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2(10): 309–317. Available on-line http://www.academicjournals.org/AJEST/PDF/pdf%202008/Oct/Albinus%20et%20al.pdf Google Scholar
  3. Allen, W.J. (1997) Towards improving the role of evaluation within natural resource management Development Studies XVIII, Special Issue: 625–638Google Scholar
  4. Allen, W.J. (2001) Working together for environmental management: the role of information sharing and collaborative learning. Ph.D. (Development Studies), Massey University. Available on-line athttp://learningforsustainability.net/research/thesis/thesis_contents.php
  5. Allen, W.J. & Bosch, O.J.H. (1996) Shared experiences: the basis for a cooperative approach to identifying and implementing more sustainable land management practices. pp. 1–10 in Proceedings of Symposium “Resource management: Issues, visions, practice” Lincoln University, New Zealand, 5–8 JulyGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen W.J. & Kilvington M.J. (2005) “Getting technical environmental information into watershed decision making.” Chapter 3 in Ed. J.L. Hatfield “The Farmers' Decision: Balancing Economic Successful Agriculture Production with Environmental Quality” Publisher: Soil and Water Conservation Society. pp. 45–61. Available from http://www.learningforsustainability. net/pubs/AllenKilvington2005
  7. Allen, W.J., Bosch, O.J.H., Gibson, R.G., & Jopp, A.J. (1998a) Co-learning our way to sustain- ability: An integrated and community-based research approach to support natural resource management decision-making. In: Multiple objective decision making for land, water and environmental management. pp. 51–59 (Eds: El-Swaify, S.A. & Yakowitz, D.S.). Boston, MA, USA: Lewis PublishersGoogle Scholar
  8. Allen, W., Brown, K., Gloag, T., Morris, J., Simpson, K., Thomas, J., & Young, R. (1998b) Building partnerships for conservation in the Waitaki/Mackenzie basins. Landcare Research Contract Report LC9899/033, Lincoln, New Zealand. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/sustainablesoc/social/partnerships.asp
  9. Allen, W.J., Bosch, O.J.H., Kilvington, M.J., Harley, D., & Brown I. (2001a) Monitoring and adaptive management: addressing social and organisational issues to improve information sharing. Natural Resources Forum 25(3): 225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Allen, W., Bosch, O., Kilvington, M., Oliver, J., & Gilbert, M. (2001b) Benefits of collaborative learning for environmental management: Applying the Integrated Systems for Knowledge Management approach to support animal pest control. Environmental Management 27(2): 215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bawden, R.J. (1991) Towards action researching systems. In: Action research for change and development. pp. 21–51 (Ed.: Zuber-Skerritt, O.). Brisbane, Australia: Centre for the Advancement of Learning and Teaching, Griffith UniversityGoogle Scholar
  12. Booth, J., Layard, N., & Dale, N. (2004) A strategy for a community information, knowledge and learning system. Prepared for The University of Northern British Columbia's Northern Land Use institute, Northern Coastal and Research Programme.Google Scholar
  13. Bosch, O.J.H., Allen, W.J., & Gibson, R.S. (1996a) Monitoring as an integral part of management and policy-making. In: Proceedings of Symposium “Resource Management: Issues, Visions, Practice.” Lincoln University, New Zealand, 5–8 July. pp. 12–21Google Scholar
  14. Bosch, O.J.H., Allen, W.J., & Gibson, R.S. (1996b) Monitoring as an integral part of management and policy making. In: Proceedings of Symposium “Resource Management: Issues, Visions, Practice.” Lincoln University, New Zealand, 5–8 July. pp. 12–21. http://www.landcarere-search.co.nz/research/sustainablesoc/social/monpaper.asp
  15. Bosch, O.J.H., Allen, W.J., Williams, J.M., & Ensor, A. (1996c) An integrated system for maximising community knowledge: Integrating community-based monitoring into the adaptive management process in the New Zealand high country. The Rangeland Journal 18(1): 23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bosch, O., Allen, W., McGleish, W., & Knights, G. (1999) Integrating research and practice through information management and collaborative learning. In: Proceedings 2nd International Conference on “Multiple Objective Decision Support Systems for Land, Water and Environmental Management (MODSS′99).” Brisbane, Australia, August 1999Google Scholar
  17. Bosch, O.J.H., Ross, A.H., & Beeton, R.S.J. (2003) Integrating science and management through collaborative learning and better information management. Systems Research and Behavioural Science 20: 107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bunning, C. (1995) Professional development using action research. Action Learning, Action Research and Process Management Internet Conference, Bradford, England, MCB University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Campbell, A.C. (1995) Landcare: Participative Australian approaches to inquiry and learning for sustainability. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50: 125–131Google Scholar
  20. Dovers, S.R. & Mobbs, C.D. (1997) An alluring prospect? Ecology, and the requirements of adaptive management. Chapter 4 in Frontiers in ecology: Building the links. In: Proceedings, Conference of the “Ecological Society of Australia 1–3 October 1997.” Charles Sturt University, Elsevier, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Feldman, D.L. (2008) Barriers to Adaptive Management: Lessons from the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint Compact. Society and Natural Resources 21(6): 512–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibson, R.S. & Bosch, O.J.H. (1996) Indicator species for the interpretation of vegetation condition in the St. Bathans area, Central Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 20(2): 163–172Google Scholar
  23. Pretty, J. (1998) Participatory learning for integrated farming. Available on-line at http://www. orphanmissions.com/documents/integratedfarming.doc (Accessed 20 November 2008)
  24. Gregory, R., Failing, L., & Higgins, P. (2006) Adaptive management and environmental decision making: A case study application to water use planning. Ecological Economics 58: 434–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris, B.V. (1993) Sustainable management as an express purpose of environmental legislation: the New Zealand attempt — Otago Law Review 8: 51–76Google Scholar
  26. Heemskerk, M., Wilson, K., & Pavao-Zuckerman, M. (2003) Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines. Conservation Ecology 7(3): 8.Google Scholar
  27. Holling, C.S. (Ed.) (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Jacobson, C. (2001) Meeting End User Needs: Extension and Evaluation of the Tussock Grasslands Management Information System. Wildlife Management Series, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  29. Jacobson, C. (2002) Tussock grassland MIS evaluation — April 2002. Tussock Grassland MIS http://www.tussocks.net.nz/evaluation2.html
  30. Johnson, F. & Williams, K. (1999) Protocol and practice in the adaptive management of waterfowl harvests. Conservation Ecology 3(1), 8Google Scholar
  31. Lynam, T., de Jong, W., Sheil, D., Kusumanto, T., & Evans, K. (2007) A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society 12(1): 5.Google Scholar
  32. MAF (1996) Semi-Arid Lands research: To develop co-operative, community based, and inte- grated research approaches for application to sustainable agriculture issues. Internet page in MAF Operational Research Results for 1995/96 - http://www.maf.govt.nz/mafnet/rural-nz/research-and-development/research-results/1995-1996/9596sc18.htm
  33. Mark, A. (2004) Our golden landscapes: An historical perspective on the ecology and management of our tussock grasslands and associated mountain lands. Hocken Lecture, Botany Department, University of Otago. Available on-line at http://www.botany.otago.ac.nz/staff/markhocken.html
  34. Martin, G., Garden, P., Meister, A., Penno, W., Sheath, G., Stephenson, G., Urquart, R., Mulcock, C., & Lough, R. (1994) South Island high country review. Final report of the working party on sustainable land management, South Island High Country Review Working Party, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. McFarlane, J. (2008) The social construction of ecological sustainability in the South Island, New Zealand, high country. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Society and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  36. McLain, R. & Lee, R. (1996) Adaptive management: promises and pitfalls Journal of Environmental Management 20: 437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O'Connor, K.F. (2003) Conflicting innovations: A problem for sustainable development of New Zealand high country grasslands. Mountain Research and Development 23(2): 104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olsen, S.B. (2003) Frameworks and indicators for assessing progress in integrated coastal management initiatives. Ocean & Coastal Management 46: 347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (1995) A review of the government system for managing the South Island tussock grasslands: with particular reference to tussock burning. Published report of the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner of the Environment, Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  40. Pretty, J. (1998) Participatory learning for integrated farming. Available on-line at http://www. orphanmissions.com/documents/integratedfarming.doc (Accessed 20 November 2008)
  41. Raadgever, G.T., Mostert, E., Kranz, N., Interwies, E., & Timmerman, J.G. (2008) Assessing management regimes in transboundary river basins: do they support adaptive management? Ecology and Society 13(1): 14Google Scholar
  42. Reed, M. (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 2417–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ricketts, H. (2001) Sustainable Land Management Through Community Involvement: The NZ Landcare Trust Experience. Paper presented to the International Community Development Conference, Rotorua (April 2001) Available http://www.iacdglobal.org/files/ricketts.pdf
  44. Schwedersky, T. & Karkoschka, O. (1994) Process Monitoring (ProM): Work document for project staff, Eschborn, Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbHGoogle Scholar
  45. Stankey, G.H., Clark, R.N., & Bormann, B.T. (2005) Adaptive management of natural resources: theory, concepts, and management institutions. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-654. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 73 p.Google Scholar
  46. Tussock Grasslands Management Information System (2000) http://www.tussocks.net.nz (downloaded 26 November 2008)
  47. Walker, S., Price, R., & Stephens, R.T. (2006) An index of risk as a measure of biodiversity conservation achieved through land reform. Conservation Biology 22(1): 48–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walkerden, G. (2006) Adaptive management planning projects as conflict resolution processes. Ecology and Society 11(1): 48Google Scholar
  49. Walters, C. (1986) Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
  50. Walters, C.J. & Hilborn, R. (1978) Ecological optimization and adaptive management. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9: 157–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wondolleck, Julia M., & Steven L. Yaffee (2000) Making Collaboration Work. Washington, D.C.: Island PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Will Allen
    • 1
  • Chris Jacobson
    • 2
  1. 1.Landcare ResearchLincolnNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of Natural and Rural Systems ManagementThe University of QueenslandGattonAustralia

Personalised recommendations