Skip to main content

The Adaptive Management System for the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area — Linking Management Planning with Effectiveness Evaluation

  • Chapter
Adaptive Environmental Management

This paper provides a 30 year retrospective on the development of the adaptive management system for the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (Australia). It describes the historical background, key influences and stages that paved the way to establishment of adaptive management. It outlines how effectiveness monitoring, evaluation and reporting are integrated with the management plan for the Area to establish an ongoing adaptive management cycle. The chapter presents figures and tools for adaptive management, including 5 useful questions for guiding the integration of effectiveness monitoring, evaluation and reporting into management plans and programs. Strengths and weaknesses of the adaptive management system are discussed. Key lessons and insights distilled from this experience are offered, including the importance of planned monitoring of management effectiveness; the role of stakeholder assessments; and the factors that can assist in sustaining longterm strategic programs despite ongoing institutional change. The chapter concludes with suggestions for fostering an enabling environment for adaptive management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Australian Government. (2007). The Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area World Heritage Committee Decision WHA-06/30.COM/7B State Party Report. Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bella, D.A. (1987). Organizations and Systemic Distortion of Information, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 113: 360–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bella, D.A. (1992). Ethics and the Credibility of Applied Science (pp. 19–31) in Ethical Questions for Resource Managers, compiled by Reeves, G.H., Bottom, D. & Brookes, M.H., General Technical Report PNW-GTR-288, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bella, D.A. (2000). Faith, Responsibility and Knowledge. Paper prepared for a seminar series at Oregon State University, Fall 2000, Oregon State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best Practice in Protected Area Management Planning. (2000). ANZECC Working Group on National Parks and Protected Areas Management Benchmarking and Best Practice Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best Practice in Park Management. (2002). Report to the National Parks and Protected Area Management Committee. A review of current approaches to performance measurement in protected area management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, J., Hockings, M. & Jones, G. (2002). Measuring Effectiveness in Marine Protected Areas — Principles and Practice. Keynote address, World Congress on Aquatic Protected Areas, August 2002, Cairns Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Parks, Wildlife and Heritage. (1992). Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 1992, Hobart Tasmania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, B. (2006). The National Reserve System Programme: 2006 Evaluation. Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, H. (1994). Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan. A Framework for Monitoring and Evaluation. June 1994, unpublished report to the Parks and Wildlife Service, Landmark Consulting, Hobart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockings, M., Stolton, S. & Dudley, N. (2000). Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas. World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 6. IUCN in collaboration with Cardiff University. Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2000). Outcomes-based evaluation of management for protected areas — a methodology for incorporating evaluation into management plans. In The Design and Management of Forest Protected Areas, Papers presented at the Beyond the Trees Conference, May 8–11, 2000, Bangkok, Thailand/WWF, Switzerland, pp. 349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2003). A Dummy's Guide to Evaluating Management of Protected Areas. Unpublished paper for the Vth World Parks Congress, Durban, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2005a). Evaluating effectiveness in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. In Assessing the Conservation Management Status of Biodiversity, Workshop Proceedings, The Nature Conservancy, Dallas, TX, October 25–27, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2005b). Is the management plan achieving its objectives? In Worboys, G., De Lacy, T., & Lockwood, M. (Eds.), Protected Area Management. Principles and Practices. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. & Dunn (Hocking), H. (2000). Experience in outcomes-based evaluation of management for the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, Australia. Case study 1, in Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas. World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 6. IUCN in collaboration with Cardiff University. Hockings, M., Stolton, S., & Dudley, N., Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council. (2005). Directions for the National Reserve System. A Partnership Approach, Australian Government, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra ACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks and Wildlife Service. (1999). Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 1999, Hobart Tasmania. Available on the Parks and Wildlife Service website at: http://www. parks.tas.gov.au/index.aspx?base = 6158.

  • Parks and Wildlife Service. (2004). State of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area — An Evaluation of Management Effectiveness. Report No. 1. Department of Tourism Parks Heritage and the Arts, Hobart Tasmania. Available on the Parks and Wildlife Service website at: http://www.parks.tas.gov.au/index.aspx?base = 6174.

  • Standing Committee on Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts. (2007). Conserving Australia: Australia's National Parks, Conservation Reserves and Marine Protected Areas, April 12, 2007, Australia Parliament Senate, Canberra ACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy. (2005). Assessing the Conservation Management Status of Biodiversity. Draft Workshop Proceedings, October 25–27, 2005, Dallas, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedung, E. (1997) Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ/London: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones*, G. (2009). The Adaptive Management System for the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area — Linking Management Planning with Effectiveness Evaluation. In: Allan, C., Stankey, G.H. (eds) Adaptive Environmental Management. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9632-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics