Skip to main content

Globalisation and Marginalisation in Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Globalisation, Policy and Comparative Research

Part of the book series: Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research ((GCEP,volume 5))

  • 1784 Accesses

Education cannot escape being influenced by the process of globalisation based on the principles of neo-liberal economic reform, a process that increases inequalities and marginalises already muted voices. The neo-liberal economic rationality of ­globalisation has framed the restructuring of education in such a manner that its function has changed from the production of knowledge to the production and management of wealth. As such, the interplay of market forces in higher education has undermined a vision of democratic society due to the superordinate influence of economic and political globalisation (Zajda 2008a and Zajda 2008b). As a result of accepting the dominant discourse of the neo-liberal, globalisation agenda ­without much critical analysis or debate regarding its consequences, education has forfeited its basic function of producing democratic citizens (see also Zajda, 2005; Zajda et al., 2008).

Globalisation is a popular and multidimensional concept. Political, economic, social and cultural dynamics of the contemporary world are subsumed within globalisation. In its political manifestation, globalisation refers to the dual phenomena of post-Cold War United States unipolarity, demonstrated by political and military hegemony. In its economic dimension, globalisation signifies, on the one hand, the neo-liberal economic agenda (also referred to as McDonaldisation) that is sweeping the world and, on the other, growing regional economic configurations. In the domain of culture, globalisation has come to signify both increased cultural contact (mainly but not exclusively through information and communication technologies; or ICTs) and cultural fragmentation manifested in the resurgence of micro, local and national cultural identities. Globalisation as a phenomenon is thus not a monolith, as it is often portrayed. It subsumes contradictory tendencies and forces, signifying tensions of cohesion on a scale hitherto unknown while suggesting the fragmentation of political, cultural and social identities at all levels (Zajda et al., 2006). To say that this process has affected almost all walks of life in one way or another would not be an exaggeration. The degree, level, and intensity of the impact vary from one society to another and from one institution to the next, depending on the space these societies occupy, their relative power, levels of their embeddedness in world economics and politics and the relative lead or lag they have with respect to information and technology integration. Education, like any other social institution, cannot escape the influence of globalisation, and these influences have varied from one educational system to another depending on their contact and interaction with the larger world (see also Lyotard, 1984; Zajda, 2005; Zajda et al. 2008a).

The original version of this chapter was revised. An erratum to this chapter can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9547-4_12

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitkin, D. (1996). The astonishing rise of higher education. Quadrant, 40(1), pp.82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1996). Cultural Politics of Education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1998). Under the new hegemonic alliance: Conservatism and educational policy in the United States. In K. Sullivan (Ed.). Education and Change in the Pacific Rim: Meeting the Challenges. Wallingford: Triangle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. (1996, May 18–19). The threat to higher learning. The Weekend Australian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S. & Di Fazio, W. (1994). The Jobless Future: Sci-Tech and the Dogma of Work. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1994). Education Reform: A Critical and Post-structural Approach. Buckingham/Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bast, J. (2002, February). The year of school vouchers. The Monthly Heartlander. Retrieved fromhttp://www.heartland.org/archives/heartlander/hlfeb02.htm.

  • Bayh-Dole Act (1980). Retrieved fromhttp://www.cptech.org/ip/health/bd/

  • Belz, J, (1998, October 17). Death to schools. World. Retrieved fromhttp://www.worldmag.com/world/issue/10-17-98/.

  • Buchbindar, H. & Rajagopal, P. (1996). Canadian universities: The impact of free trade and globalisation. Higher Education, 31, 282–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchbindar, H. & Newson, J. (1990). Corporate-university linkages in Canada: Transforming a public institution. Higher Education, 20, 355–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business-Higher Education Forum. (1983, April). American Competitive Challenge: The Need for a National Response. Washington, DC: The Business-Higher Education Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business-Higher Education Forum. (1986, January). Export Controls: The Need to Balance National Objectives. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J. & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei, S. & Karumanchery, L. (2001). School reforms in Ontario: The ‘marketization of education’s and the resulting silence on equity. In J. Portelli & P. Solomon (Eds.). The Erosion of Democracy in Education. Detselig Enterprises Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916/1985). Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, R. (2000, February). Its Time to Put Public Education Behind Us. The Future of Freedom Foundation, commentaries. Retrieved fromhttp://www.fff.org/comment/ed0200f.asp.

  • Fisher, D., Rubenson, K. (1998). The changing political economy: The private and public lives of Canadian universities. In J. Currie and J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and globalization: Critical perspectives (pp. 77–98). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, O. (1991). Slouching towards a mass system: Society, government, and institutions in the United Kingdom. Higher education, 21, 589–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A. (1989). Privatization, Thatcherism, and the British state. Journal of Law and Society. 16(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, A. (2002, January/February). Testing…testing…one, two, three: The commercial side of standardized-testing. Dollars and Sense, 239, 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvernement du Quebec (1996). The State of Education in Quebec, 1995–1996. Quebec City: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable (1992). Fateful Choices: The Future of the U.S. Academic Research Enterprise. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Britain White Paper (1993). Realizing Our Potential: Strategy for Science, Engineering and Technology. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, R. (1998). Social justice and the politics of school effectiveness and improvement. British Race, Ethnicity and Education, 1(2), 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, J. (1994). Today’s college teachers: cheap and temporary. Labor Notes, No. 188, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1993). Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-fordist political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 40, 7–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, G. (1992). Bidding for students in Britain – why the UFC auction “failed”. Higher Education, 23, 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. (1984). The Post-Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Tr. G. Bennington & B. Massumi (Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (2003). Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allen & Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M. & Schapiro, M. (1993). Changing patterns of college finance and enrollment. In D. Breneman, L. Leslie, & R. Anderson (Eds.). ASHE Reader on Finance in Higher Education. Needham Heights, MA: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. (1994). Science and Technology Policy in Interdependent Economies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, K. (2001). Democracy, democratic citizenship, and education. In J. Portelli & R. Solomon (Eds.). The Erosion of Democracy in Education. Calgary: Detselig Enterprise Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, W. (2003). Teaching Democracy: Unity and Diversity in Public Life. New York/London: Teacher’s College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (1992). Unification of higher education in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Education, 27(1/2), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. (1998). National higher education policies in a global economy. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.). Universities and Globalisation: Critical Perspectives. London/New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S. & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (1994). The UGC and the Management of British Universities. London: The society for research into higher education/Open University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromquist, N. & Monkman, K. (Eds.). (2000). Globalisation and Education: Integration and Contestation Across Cultures. Towman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2001). Education, business, and the ‘knowledge economy’. In J. Portelli & R. Solomon (Eds.). The Erosion of Democracy in Education. Calgary: Detselig Enterprise Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1994). Higher Education: The Lessons of Experience. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. (2005). Globalisation, Education and Policy: changing Paradigms. In J. Zajda (Ed.). The International Handbook of Globalisation and Education Policy Research pp. 1–22. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. Majhanovich, S., & Rust, V. (2006). Education and social justice: Issues of liberty and equality in the global culture. In J. Zajda, S. Majhanovich, & V. Rust (Eds.). Education and Social Justice (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J., Davies, L., & Majhanovich, S. (2008a). (Eds.). Comparative and Global Pedagogies: Equity, Access and Democracy in Education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajda, J. Biraimah, B., & Gaudelli, W. (2008b). (Eds.). Education and Social Inequality in the Global Culture. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arshad-Ayaz, A. (2009). Globalisation and Marginalisation in Higher Education . In: Zajda, J., Rust, V. (eds) Globalisation, Policy and Comparative Research. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9547-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics