Colon Cancer: Laparoscopic Surgery

  • David W. Larson
  • Heidi Nelson
Part of the Methods of Cancer Diagnosis, Therapy, and Prognosis book series (HAYAT, volume 4)

The operative choices available for colec-tomy for cancer expanded in May of 2004 with the publication of Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) (Nelson and COST Study Group, 2004). Laparoscopic or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the treatment of malignant disease had the evidence needed to ethically offer it to patients with cancer. Although laparo-scopic surgery for colonic disease languished with relatively slow adoption in the 1990s and early 21st century, it has more recently gained momentum. This interest in MIS has been due in large part to the growing and expanding array of surgical indications given trials such as COST, Conventional vs. Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Colorectal Cancer (CLASICC), and Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open resection (COLOR) (Nelson and COST Study Group., 2004; Guillou et al., 2005; Veldkamp et al., 2005; Jayne et al., 2007; Fleshman et al., 2007) as well as the improvement in instrumentation and surgical education. Both the growth in clinical indications and academic publication and education has altered the tenor of surgical debate, to one committed to minimally invasive approaches. However, there remain many important issues which the surgeon must weigh in order to properly implement these modern techniques in the setting of colon cancer.

The use of laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer requires much thought and consideration. Technically, the surgery is much more demanding than its open counterpart. Although the actual details of the operation have changed little from the open approach, the integration of imaging, instrumentation, and surgical expertise have added a dimension of complexity to the operation that many surgeons find unfamiliar. As one overcomes these significant obstacles, the results for the patient are obvious with multiple publications demonstrating improved postoperative morbidity and improved recovery (Nelson and COST Study Group., 2004; Guillou et al., 2005; Veldkamp et al., 2005; Noel et al., 2007; Lacy et al., 2002). Here we hope to articulate the presentation and staging, risks and complications, oncologic outcomes, and techniques regarding the use of a laparoscopic approach in the treatment of colon cancer.

Keywords

Dioxide Adenocarcinoma Anemia Oncol Assure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berends, F.J., Kazemier, G., Bonjer, H.J., and Lange, J.F. 1994. Subcutaneous metastases after laparo-scopic colectomy. Lancet 344: 58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davies, M.M. and Larson, D.W. 2004. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: the state of the art. Surg. Oncol. 13: 111–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Devine, R. and Pemberton, J.H. 1995. Right and left hemicolectomy. In: Donohue J, Van Heerden J, Monson J, editors. Atlas of Surgical Oncology. Blackwell Science, Oxford: 215–221.Google Scholar
  4. Fleshman, J., Sargent, D.J., Green, E., Anvari, M., Stryker, S.J., Beart, R.W., Hellinger, M., Flanagan, R., Peters, W., and Nelson, H. 2007. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann. Surg. 246: 655–664.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guillou, P.J., Quirke, P., Thorpe, H., Walker, J., Jayne, D.G., Smith, A.M., Heath, R.M., and Brown, J.M. 2005. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365: 1718–1726.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jayne, D.G., Brown, J.M., Thorpe, H., Walker, J., Quirke, P., and Guillou, P.J. 2005. Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br. J. Surg. 92: 1124–1132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jayne, D.G., Guillou, P.J., Thorpe, H., Quirke, P., Copeland, J., Smith, A.M., Heath, R.M., and Brown, J.M. 2007. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 25: 3061–3068.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lacy, A.M., Garcia-Valdecasas, J.C., Delgado, S., Castells, A., Taura, P., Pique, J.M., and Visa, J. 2002. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359: 2224–2229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Meagher, A.P. and Wolff, B.G. 1994. Right hemi-colectomy with a linear cutting stapler. Dis. Colon Rectum 37: 1043–1045.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nelson, H. and COST Study Group. 2004. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 350: 2050–2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Noel, J.K., Fahrbach, K., Estok, R., Cella, C., Frame, D., Linz, H., Cima, R.R., Dozois, E.J., and Senagore, A.J. 2007. Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: short-term comparison with open procedures. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 204: 291–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Veldkamp, R., Kuhry, E., Hop, W.C., Jeekel, J., Kazemier, G., Bonjer, H.J., Haglind, E., Pahlman, L., Cuesta, M.A., Msika, S., Morino, M., and Lacy, A.M. 2005. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 6: 477–484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Young-Fadok, T.M and Nelson, H. 2000. Laparoscopic right colectomy: five-step procedure. Dis. Colon Rectum. 43: 267–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • David W. Larson
    • 1
  • Heidi Nelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations