Skip to main content

Assumption Interrogation: An Insight into a Self-Study Researcher’s Pedagogical Frame

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research Methods for the Self-study of Practice

Part of the book series: Self Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices ((STEP,volume 9))

Embedded assumptions about teaching, and learning through teaching, are not easy to identify and are even more difficult to alter. This chapter seeks to contextualize Dewey’s (1933) attitude of “responsibility” (p. 12) through identifying and interrogating taken-for-granted assumptions about learning and teaching. Using self-study of teaching as my methodology and assumption hunting (Brookfield, 1995) as a lens, I came to understand how powerful this combination was in revealing more about the complexities of teaching. Through questioning and ‘suspending’ (van Manen, 1990) taken-for-granted assumptions, more has been revealed about the structures which enabled the creation of new knowledge and the subsequent challenges to my conceptualization of learning and teaching as a teacher educator. A consequence of my systematic evaluation has been the modification, and in some cases, major alteration of practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berry, A. (2004a). Confidence and uncertainty in teaching about teaching. Australian Journal of Education, 48(2), 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. (2004b). Self-study in teaching about teaching. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 2, pp. 1295–1332). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. (2007). Tensions in teaching about teaching: Understanding practice as a teacher educator.Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, R. (2004). Roundtable reflections: (Re) defining the role of the teacher educator and the preservice teacher as co-learners. Australian Journal of Education, 48(2), 166–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, R. (2008). Powerful pedagogy: Self-study of a teacher educator’s practice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R. V., Jr., & Pinnegar, S. (2004). Thinking about the thinking about self-study: An analysis of eight chapters. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher-education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 313–342). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A., & Erickson, G. (2004). Self-study: The fifth commonplace. Australian Journal of Education, 48(2), 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 601–649). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalmau, M. C., Hamilton, M. L., & Bodone, F. (2002). Communicating self-study within the scholarship of teacher education: Herstmonceux working group. In C. Kosnik, A. Samaras, & A. Freese (Eds.), Making a difference in teacher education through self-study. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, Herstmonceux Castle, East Sussex, England (Vol. 1, pp. 59–62). Toronto, Canada: OISE, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Chicago: Henry Regnery. (Original work published in 1909).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. M. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. M., & Zeichner, K. M. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: A case study from the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2), 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. L. (2004). Professional knowledge, and self-study teacher education. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 375–419). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2000). On the threshold of a new century: Trustworthiness, integrity, and self-study in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Retrieved September, 2003, from http://www2.edfac.usyd.edu.au/LocalResource/Study1/hattonart.html

  • Kelchtermans, G. (2005, July). Professional commitment beyond contract: Teachers’ self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Paper presented at the International Study Association on Teachers and Teaching, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2003). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A. J., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosnik, C. (2001). The effects of an inquiry-oriented teacher education program on a faculty member: Some critical incidents and my journey. Reflective Practice, 2(1), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBoskey, V. K. (1994). Development of reflective practice: A study of preservice teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 2, pp. 817–869). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A handbook for teacher research: From design to implementation. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (2004). Learning through self-study: The influence of purpose, participants and context. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 1, pp. 151–192). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J., & Russell, T. (Eds.). (2002). Improving teacher education practices through self-study. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N., & Freidus, H. (2004). The reflective portfolio in self-study: Inquiring into and representing a knowledge of practice. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 2, pp. 1073–1107). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pinnegar, S. (1998). Introduction to Part II: Methodological perspectives. In M. L. Hamilton, S. Pinnegar, T. Russell, J. Loughran, & V. K. LaBoskey (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 30–33). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. (2004). Tracking the development of self-study in teacher education research and practice. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (Vol. 2, pp. 1191–1210). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Ontario: Althouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robyn Brandenburg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brandenburg, R. (2009). Assumption Interrogation: An Insight into a Self-Study Researcher’s Pedagogical Frame. In: Fitzgerald, L., Heston, M., Tidwell, D. (eds) Research Methods for the Self-study of Practice. Self Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9514-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics