Skip to main content

On Kant's Transcendental Account of Newtonian Mechanics

  • Chapter
Constituting Objectivity

Part of the book series: The Western Ontario Series In Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 74))

  • 1083 Accesses

Abstract

Kant's account of Newtonian science in terms of a priori structures of the mind has been generally interpreted as too restrictive. If Newtonian science is an instantiation of the system of categories, then, in order to retain any value, they need to be dynamized in accordance with the development of science beyond Newton. This paper suggests that the restriction in best understood as Kant attempt to provide a primary matrix of sense for any possible natural science, inasmuch as it reflects the “first idea” contained in the Copernican Revolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Brittan, G. Kant's Theory of Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts, R., ed. Kant's Philosophy of Physical Science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J.Substance, Force, and the Possibility of Knowledge: On Kant's Philosophy of Material Nature. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloy, K. Die Kantische Theorie der Naturwissenschaft. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, H. Kants Theorie der Physik. Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerszberg, P. Kant et la Nature. Paris: Belles-Lettres, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudroch, V. Kants Theorie der physikalischen Gesetze. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaass, P. Kant's Theory of Natural Science. Trans. A.E. Miller and M.G. Miller. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollok, K. Kants Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft: Ein kritischer Kommentar.Hamburg, Germany: F.Meiner, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, L. Kants Metaphysik der Natur. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuschling, B. Metaphysische and transzendentale Dynamik in Kants opus postumum. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuillemin J. Physique et métaphysique kantiennes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. Reality and Impenetrability in Kant's Philosophy of Nature. New York: Routledge,2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, E., ed. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kerszberg, P. (2009). On Kant's Transcendental Account of Newtonian Mechanics. In: Bitbol, M., Kerszberg, P., Petitot, J. (eds) Constituting Objectivity. The Western Ontario Series In Philosophy of Science, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9510-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics