Abstract
Hardly another principle of classical physics has to a larger extent nourished hopes into a universal theory and has simultaneously been plagued by mathematical counterexamples than the Principle of Least Action (PLA). I investigate whether the PLA can be interpreted as a historically relativized constitutive a priori principle of mathematical physics along the lines Michael Friedman has drawn in Dynamics of Reason, using the example of relativity theory. Such an interpretation suggests itself, historically, because two main advocates of the PLA, Max Planck and David Hilbert, considered relativity theory as a case in point for the PLA. But they were also aware of the mathematical pitfalls and that without physical specification the PLA only represented an empty form. I argue that the different levels required for a consistent application of the PLA in mathematical physics induce a stratification that bears close parallels to the one by which Friedman intends to overcome the joint challenges of epistemological holism and a relativist reading of Kuhnian incommensurability. Yet, two differences remain. First, the mathe matical and physical levels of the PLA are more intertwined than in Friedman's case. Second, although the PLA has survived quite a few scientific revolutions, so has the formulation of physical theories in terms of differential equations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carnap, R. (1950), “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”, Revue internationale de philosophie, 4, 20–40.
Friedman, M. (2001), Dynamics of Reason, Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Hilbert, D. (1900), “Mathematische Probleme”, Göttinger Nachrichten. Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 253–297. English translation in Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 8 (1902), 437–479.
Hilbert, D. (1916), “Die Grundlagen der Physik (Erste Mitteilung)”, Göttinger Nachrichten. Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 395–407.
Hilbert, D. (1917), “Die Grundlagen der Physik (Zweite Mitteilung)”, Göttinger Nachrichten. Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 53–76.
Hilbert, D. (1918), “Axiomatisches Denken”, Mathematische Annalen, 78, 405–415. English translation in W. Ewald (ed.), From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. II. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996, 1105–1115.
Hilbert, D. (1924), “Die Grundlagen der Physik”, reprinted in Hilbertiana–Fünf Aufsätze von David Hilbert, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1964, 47–78.
Hilbert, D. (1930), “Naturerkennen und Logik”, Die Naturwissenschaften, 18, 959–963. English translation in W. Ewald (ed.), op.cit., vol. II., 1157–1165.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mach, E. (1989), The Science of Mechanics. Account of Its Development, La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Planck, M. (1910), “Zur Theorie der Wärmestrahlung”, in: Physikalische Abhandlungen und Vorträge, Braunschweig, Vieweg, 1958, vol. II, 237–247.
Planck, M. (1944), Wege zur physikalischen Erkenntnis. Reden und Vorträge, Leipzig: S. Hirzel.
Reichenbach, H. (1920), Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis A Priori, Berlin: Springer; English translation, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1965
Rowe, D.E. (2001), “Einstein Meets Hilbert: At the Crossroads of Physics and Mathematics”, Physics in Perspective, 3, 379–424.
Sauer, T. (1999), “The Relativity of Discovery: Hilbert's First Note on the Foundations of Physics”, Archive for the History of Exact Sciences, 53, 529–575.
Stöltzner, M. (2000), “Le principe de moindre action et les trois ordres de la téléologie formelle dans la Physique”, Archives de Philosophie, 63, 621–655.
Stöltzner, M. (2003), “The Least Action Principle as the Logical Empiricist's Shibboleth”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34, 285–318.
Stöltzner, M. (2005), “Drei Ordnungen formaler Teleologie. Ansichten des Prinzips der kleinsten Wirkung”, in M. Stöltzner and P. Weingartner (eds.), Formale Teleologie und Kausalität, Paderborn: Mentis, 199–241.
Von Helmholtz, H. (1886), “Über die physikalische Bedeutung des Princips der kleinsten Wirkung”, in: Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Leipzig, 1895, vol. III, 203–248.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stöltzner, M. (2009). Can the Principle of Least Action Be Considered a Relativized A Priori?. In: Bitbol, M., Kerszberg, P., Petitot, J. (eds) Constituting Objectivity. The Western Ontario Series In Philosophy of Science, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9510-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9510-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9509-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9510-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)