The Transcendental Role of the Principle of Anticipations of Perception in Quantum Mechanics

  • Patricia Kauark-Leite
Part of the The Western Ontario Series In Philosophy of Science book series (WONS, volume 74)

Abstract

The aim of this work is to analyse the diffrerences between the formal structure of anticipation of perception in classical and in quantum context. I argue that a transcendental point of view can be supported in quantum context if objectivity is defined by an invariant anticipative structure, which has only a predictive character. The classical objectivity, which defined a set of properties having a descriptive meaning must be abandoned in quantum context. I will focus my analysis on Kant's Principle of the Anticipations of Perception.

Keywords

Manifold Metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Allison, H. (2004). Kant's transcendental idealism. Revised and enlarged edition. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bitbol, M. (1996). Mécanique quantique: une introduction philosophique. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  3. Bitbol, M. (1998). ‘Some steps towards a transcendental deduction of quantum mechanics’, Philosophia naturalis, 35, 253–280.Google Scholar
  4. Bitbol, M. (2000a). ‘Relations, Synthèses, Arrière-Plans; sur la philosophie transcendantale et la physique moderne’, Archives de Philosophie, 63, 595–620.Google Scholar
  5. Bitbol, M. (2000b). ‘Arguments transcendantaux en physique moderne’, in S. Chauvier, F. Capeillères (ed.), La querelle des arguments transcendantaux, Revue philosophique de l'Université de Caen, 35, 81–101.Google Scholar
  6. Bitbol, M. (2005). ‘Anticiper l'unité: une méthode de connaissance’, in M. Cazenave (ed.), Unité du monde, unité de l'être. Paris: Dervy.Google Scholar
  7. Bohr, N. (1928). ‘The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory’, Nature (Suppl.), 121, 580–590 (BCW6, 147–158).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassirer, E. (1956). Determinism and indeterminism in modern physics: historical and systematic studies of the problem of causality. Trad. O. T. Benfey. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, H. (1999). Le principe de la méthode infinitésimale et son histoire. Trad. M. Launay. Paris: J. Vrin. (publié originellement à Berlin: F. Dümmler, 1883).Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, H. (2000). Commentaire de la «Critique de la raison pure» de Kant. Trad. E. Dufour. Paris: Les Editions du Cerf.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, H. (2001). La théorie kantienne de l'expérience. Trad. E. Dufour et J. Servois. Paris: Les Editions du Cerf.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, M. (1992). Kant and the exact sciences. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Heisenberg, W. (1930). The physical principles of the quantum theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Hermann, G. (1996). Les fondements philosophiques de la mécanique quantique. Trad. A. Schnell, introduction et postface par Lena Soler. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  15. Hermann, G. (1999). ‘The foundations of quantum mechanics in the philosophy of nature’, Harvard review of philosophy, 7, 35–44.Google Scholar
  16. Hughes, R. I. G. (1992). The structure and interpretation of quantum mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kant (1998). Critique of pure reason. Trans. P. Guyer, A. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Petitot, J. (1991). La philosophie transcendantale et le problème de l'objectivité. Paris: Osiris.Google Scholar
  19. Petitot, J. (1992). ‘Actuality of transcendental aesthetics for modern physics’, in L. Boi, D. Flament, J.-M. Salanskis (eds.), 1830–1930: a century of geometry. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany/New York: Springer, 273–304.Google Scholar
  20. Petitot, J. (1994). ‘Esthétique transcendantale et physique mathématique’, in E. W. Orth et H. Holzhey (eds.), Der Neukantianismus. Perspektiven und probleme. Würzburg, Germany: Königshausen & Neumann, 185–213.Google Scholar
  21. Posy, C. (1992). ‘Kant's mathematical realism’, in Carl J. Posy (ed.), Kant's philosophy of mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 293–313.Google Scholar
  22. Putnam, H. (1983). ‘Why there isn't a ready-made world’, Realism and reason, Philosophical papers, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 205–228.Google Scholar
  23. Strawson, P. F. (1966). The bounds of sense: an essay on Kant's critique of pure reason. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Kauark-Leite
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBrazil

Personalised recommendations