Skip to main content

A Novel Size-Selective Airborne Particle Sampling Instrument (Wras) for Health Risk Evaluation

  • Conference paper
Book cover Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits

Abstract

Health risks associated with inhalation of airborne particles are known to be influenced by particle sizes. A reliable, size resolving sampler, classifying particles in size ranges from 2 nm—30 μm and suitable for use in the field would be beneficial in investigating health risks associated with inhalation of airborne particles. A review of current aerosol samplers highlighted a number of limitations. These could be overcome by combining an inertial deposition impactor with a diffusion collector in a single device. The instrument was designed for analysing mass size distributions. Calibration was carried out using a number of recognised techniques. The instrument was tested in the field by collecting size resolved samples of lead containing aerosols present at workplaces in factories producing crystal glass. The mass deposited on each substrate proved sufficient to be detected and measured using atomic absorption spectroscopy. Mass size distributions of lead were produced and the proportion of lead present in the aerosol nanofraction calculated and varied from 10% to 70% by weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown J. S., Kirby L. Z. and William D. B. (2002) Ultrafine particle deposition and clearance in the healthy and obstructed lung. Am J Resp Crit Care Med, 166:1240– 1247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng Y. S., Keating J. A. and Kanapilly G. M. (1980) Theory and calibration of a screen-type diffusion battery, J Aerosol Sci., 11:549–556.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng Y. S. and Yeh H. C. (1980) Theory of a screen-type diffusion battery. J. Aerosol Sci. 11:313–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dockery D. W., Pope C. A., Xu X., Spengler J. D., Ware J. H., Fay M. E., Ferris B. G. and Speizer F. E. (1993) An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. N Engl J Med 329:1753–1759.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Donaldson K., Li X. Y. and MacNee W. (1998) Ultrafine (nanometer) particle-mediated lung injury. J Aerosol Sci 29:553–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferin J. (1994) Pulmonary retention and clearance of particles. Toxicol Lett 72:121– 125.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferin J., Oberdorster G. and Penny D. P. (1992) Pulmonary retention of ultrafine and fine particle in rats. Am J Resp Cell Mol Biol 6:535–542.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorbunov B., Priest N., Jackson P. R. and Cartlidge D. (2000) Aerosol size distribution of lead at working places. J Aerosol Sci 31(Suppl. 1):S520–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hart K. M. and Pankow J. F. (1994) High-volume air sampler for particle and gas sampling. 2. Use of backup filters to correct for the adsorption of gas-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to the front filter. Environ Sci Technol 28:655–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hinds W. C. (1999) Aerosol technology. Properties, Behaviour and Measurement of Airborne Particles. New York: Wiley, pp. 233–259.

    Google Scholar 

  11. John W. (2001) Size Distribution Characteristics of Aerosols. In: Aerosol Measurement. Principles, Techniques and Applications. Ed. PA Baron and K Willeke. New York: Wiley, pp. 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  12. May K. R. (1982) A personal note on the history of the cascade impactor. J Aerosol Sci 13:37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore M., Gorbunov B. and Williams I. (1998) A new method to study interaction of semi-volatile compounds with aerosol particles. J Aerosol Sci 29(Suppl. 1):S887–888.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oberdorster G., Ferin J. and Lehnert B. E. (1994) Correlation between particle-size, in-vivo particle persistence, and lung injury. Environ Health Perspect 102(Suppl. 5):173– 179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pope C. A., Dockery D. W. and Schwartz J. (1995) Review of epidemiological evidence of health effects of particulate air pollution. Inhal Toxicol 7:1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sinclair D., Countess R. J., Liu B. Y. H. and Pui D. Y. H. (1976) Experimental verification of diffusion battery theory. J Air Poll Control Assoc 26:661–663.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Muir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gnewuch, H., Muir, R., Gorbunov, B., Priest, N.D., Jackson, P.R. (2009). A Novel Size-Selective Airborne Particle Sampling Instrument (Wras) for Health Risk Evaluation. In: Linkov, I., Steevens, J. (eds) Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9491-0_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics