Introductory Remarks

  • G. Thottappilly

A tropical American vine, sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) is in the botanical family Convolvulaceae along with common plants, such as bindweed and morning glory. In developing countries, sweetpotato is ranked fifth in economic value production, sixth in dry matter production, seventh in energy production, ninth in protein production, and it has tremendous flexibility of utilization as food, feed and industrial products (Gregory, 1992). Sweetpotatoes should not be confused with potato (Solanum tuberosum) which belongs to Solanaceae and are entirely unrelated, although their uses can be similar. Orange-fleshed sweetpotatoes are often known as yams, especially in the southern United States, but they are quite different from true yams (Dioscorea sp.) in growth habit and use. Furthermore, unlike Dioscorea yams, which is native to Africa and Asia, the greens of sweetpotatoes are edible and provide an important source of food in Africa (Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia) as well as in East Asia (Scott et al., 2000a, b).


Sweet Potato Storage Root Introductory Remark Night Blindness Morning Glory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. FAOSTAT 2006. FAO Statistical Databases. URL
  2. Gao, F., Gong, Y.F. and Zhang, P.B. 2000. Production and development of virus-free sweet potato in China. Crop Protect. 19 :105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gregory, P. 1992. Feeding tomorrow’s hungry: The role of root and tuber crops. In: Sweet potato technology for the 21st century, pp.: xxxvii–xxxviii. Walter A. Hill, Conrad K. Bonsi and Philip A. Loretan (eds), Tuskegee University, Auskegee, Alabama. 607 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Hill, W.A., Bonsi, C.K. and Loretam, P.A. 1992. Sweetpotato research: Current status and future needs. In: Sweet potato technology for the 21st century, pp.: xvii–xxv. Walter A. Hill, Conrad K. Bonsi and Philip A. Loretan (eds), Tuskegee University, Auskegee, Alabama, 607 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Orno, J. 1991. Farmer perception on economic and environmental importance of sweet potato. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual UPWARD International Conference, University of the Philippines at Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines.Google Scholar
  6. Scott, G.J., Best, R., Rosegrant, M. and Bokanga, M. 2000a. Roots and tubers in the global food system: A vision statement for the year 2020. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru, 111 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Scott, G.J., Rosegrant, M.W. and Ringler, C. 2000b. Roots and tubers for the 21st century. Trends, projections, and policy options. Food, agriculture, and the environment, Discussion paper 31. International Food Policy Research Institute and Centro Internacuional de la Papa, 64 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Shang, Y.F., Yang, C.L., Zhao, J.H., Li, C.S., Lu, X.B., Wang, S.J. and Xin, X.Q. 1999. Progress in the researches and application of virus-free sweet potato in Shandong province. Research progress in plant protection and plant nutrition 1999, pp. 104–108. China Agricultural Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  9. Verrill, A.H. 1937. Foods America gave the world. Boston: L.C. Page & Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Thottappilly
    • 1
  1. 1.Sardaya College of Engineering and TechnologyKodakaraIndia

Personalised recommendations