Advertisement

What Does The European Experience Tell Us On Aid For Trade?

  • Sanoussi Bilal
  • Francesco Rampa
Part of the United Nations University Series on Regionalism book series (UNSR, volume 2)

Since the launch of the aid-for-trade (AfT) initiative at the World Trade Organization (WTO) Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong in December 2005, the debate on the developing countries need for support to benefit from trade(-related) reforms and liberalisation has attracted much attention and generated several new policy initiatives. Yet, development assistance for trade matters is nothing new.1 Experience by multilateral agencies, as well as regional and bilateral donors can prove most useful in better understanding what has worked and what has been less effective.2 In this regard, the experience of the European Union (EU), as the largest donor in the world and a main provider of aid for trade, is of great interest.

Keywords

World Trade Organiza Trade Policy Regional Integration Recipient Country European Union Member State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. . Declaration of the 3rd meeting of the ACP Ministers of Finance and Economic Affairs, 28 April 2006, Brussels. http://www.acpsec.org
  2. ADE (2004). Evaluation of Trade Related Assistance by the EC in Third Countries Vol. 1 & 2, Louvain-la-Neuve. http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/evaluation/eval_reports/reports_by_year.htm#2004
  3. Bilal, S. (2004). Can the EU Be a Model and a Driving Force for Regional Integration in Developing Countries?, Paper presented at the Second Annual Conference of the Euro-Latin Study Network on Integration and Trade (ELSNIT), Session III – Institutional Dimensions of Integration and Trade, 29–30 October 2004, Florence. http://www.iadb.org/europe/index.php?file=news_and_events/elsnit_conf_2004/Bilal_ELSNIT_2004.pdf
  4. Bilal, S. and S. Szepesi (2006). Trade Capacity Building as a Facilitator of Global Public Goods. In: Secretariat of the International Task Force on Global Public Goods (Ed.), Meeting Global Challenges: International Cooperation in the National Interest, Stockholm, Sweden: International Trade. http://www.gpgtaskforce.org
  5. Bourguignon F. and M. Sundberg (2007). Aid Effectiveness – Opening the Black Box, World Bank paper presented at the American Economics Association annual meeting, January 5–7 2007, Washington. http://www.gsdrc.org/go/display&type=Document&id=2614
  6. ECDPM and ODI (2008). The new EPAs: comparative analysis of their content and the challenges for 2008, ECDPM Policy Management Report 14, Maastricht. http://www.ecdpm.org/pmr14
  7. European Commission (1999). Development and Humanitarian Assistance of the European Union. An Evaluation of the Instruments and Programmes managed by the European Commission”, Final Synthesis Report, Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2002). Progress Report on the Implementation of the Common Framework for Country Strategy Papers, Commission Staff Working Paper SEC(2002)1279, Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. Commission (2005). EC Trade-Related Assistance (TRA) – some key facts and figures, Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (2006). Making trade work for development, Brussels: European Commission. http://trade-info.cec.eu.int/doclib/html/118805.htm
  11. Eurostep (2006). An assessment of the Programming of EC aid to ACP countries under the 10th EDF, Brussels: Eurostep. http://www.eurostep.org/wcm/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download &gid=98&Itemid=41
  12. Frederiksen, J. (2003). Mid-Term Reviews: Performance-based partnerships in ACP-EU cooperation, ECDPM InBrief, No. 5. http://www.ecdpm.org/inbrief5
  13. Frederiksen, J. and H. Baser (2004). Better aid delivery or deconcentration of bureaucracy? a snapshot of the EC’s devolution process, ECDPM InBrief, No. 10. http://www.ecdpm.org/inbrief10
  14. FTAO (2007). Contribution from the Fair Trade movement to the EU debate on ‘AfT’, Fair Trade Advocacy Office, April 2007. http://www.fairtrade-advocacy.org
  15. General Affairs and Economic Relations Council of the European Union (GAERC) (2006). Conclusions on Aid for trade, Brussels: European Union (12 October 2006).Google Scholar
  16. General Affairs and Economic Relations Council of the European Union (GAERC) (2008). Conclusions on EPAs, Brussels: European Union (26–27 May 2008).Google Scholar
  17. ILEAP (2007). Regional Aid for Trade, ILEAP Negotiating Advisory Brief, No. 12. http://www.ileap-jeicp.org
  18. Mackie, J. (2007). EDF Management and Performance. In: G. Laporte (Ed.), The Cotonou Partnership Agreement: What role in a changing world? Reflections on the future of ACP-EU relations, ECDPM Policy Management Report No. 13. http://www.ecdpm.org/pmr13
  19. Marti, D.F. and F. Rampa (2007). Aid for Trade. Twenty Lessons from Existing Aid Schemes, ECDPM Discussion Paper No. 80.Google Scholar
  20. OECD (2001). DAC Guidelines on Strengthening Trade Capacity for Development, Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/document/31/0,2340,en_2649_34665_1886111_1_1_1_1,00.html
  21. OECD (2006). Trade-Related Technical Assistance and Capacity Building: What Do Recent Thematic Evaluations Tell Us?, COM/DCD/DEV(2006)1, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/31/45/ 37624158.pdf
  22. OECD (2007). Aid for Trade: Making it Effective, Development Co-operation Report, Vol. 8 (1), Paris. https://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/23/15/37438309.pdf
  23. OECD and WTO (2007). Aid for Trade at a Glance: Country and Agency Chapters. Paris: OECD http://www.oecd.org/document/46/0,3343,fr_2649_34665_39619566_1_1_1_1,00.html
  24. Oxfam (2005). Scaling Up Aid for Trade: How to Support Poor Countries to Trade their Way Out of Poverty, Oxfam Briefing Note, 15 November.Google Scholar
  25. Rampa, F. (2007). Implementation of Article 37 (4) of the Cotonou Agreement – Provision of technical support to assist the Pacific ACP Region in the Review of EPA Negotiations, Maastricht: The European Centre for Development Policy Management. http://www.ecdpm.org
  26. Rourke, P. (2006). Strategic positioning and trade-related capacity development: The case of CTPL and Russia, ECDPM Discussion Paper 57O, Maastricht. http://www.ecdpm.org/dp57o
  27. Solignac Lecomte, H.-B. (2001). Building capacity to trade: a road map for development partners – insights from Africa and the Caribbean, ECDPM Discussion Paper 33, Maastricht. http://www.ecdpm.org/dp33
  28. Stiglitz, J. and A. Charlton (2006). Aid for Trade, a report for the Commonwealth Secretariat. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanoussi Bilal
    • 1
  • Francesco Rampa
    • 1
  1. 1.ECDPMThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations