Digital Literacy and Using Online Discussions: Reflections from Teaching Large Cohorts in Teacher Education

  • Anne Scott
  • Josephine Ryan
Part of the Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research book series (GCEP, volume 4)


Preservice Teacher Online Discussion Chinese Student Online Teaching Social Presence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Beswick, K. (2003). Accounting for the contextual nature of teachers’ beliefs in considering their relationship to practice. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert & J. Mousley (Eds.), 26th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Mathematics Education Research: Innovation, Networking, Opportunity (Vol. 1, pp. 152–159). Sydney: MERGA.Google Scholar
  3. Bunz, U. (2003). Growing from computer literacy towards computer-mediated communication competence: Evolution of the field and evaluation of a new measurement instrument. Information Technology, Education and Society, 4(2), 27–46.Google Scholar
  4. Burbules, N. (n.d.). The new possibilities of online pedagogy. Retrieved 17 August 2006, from
  5. Burbules, N., & Callister, T. (2000). Universities in transition: The promise and the challenge of new technologies. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cotton, D., & Yorke, J. (2006). Analysing online discussions: What are students learning? In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference: Whos Learning? Whose Technology? (pp. 163–171). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gabriel, M. (2004). Learning together: Exploring group interactions online. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 54–72.Google Scholar
  8. Gerbric, P. (2005). Chinese learners and computer mediated communication: Balancing culture, technology, and pedagogy. In H. Goss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference: Balance, Fidelity, Mobility: Maintaining the Momentum? (Vol. 1, pp. 241–251). Brisbane: Department Call for Teaching and Learning Support Services, Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs, D., & Krause, K.-L. (2007) (Eds.). Cyberlines 2.0: Languages and Culture of the Internet. Melbourne: James Nicholas Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Good, T., Biddle, B., & Brophy, J. (1975). Teachers Make a Difference. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  11. Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competencies for online teaching: A special report. ETR & D, 49(1), 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hara, N., Bonk, C., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holmes, K. (2004). Analysis of asynchronous online discussion using SOLO taxonomy. From
  14. Im, Y., & Lee, O. (2003). Pedagogical implications of online discussion for preservice teacher training. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 155–170.Google Scholar
  15. Kardash, C., & Scholes, R. (1996). Effects of pre-existing beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and the need for cognition on the interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 260–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lankshear, C., Snyder, I., & Green, B. (2000). Teachers and Technoliteracy. Managing Literacy, Technology and Learning in Schools. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  17. Louden, W., & Rogl, M. (2006) “Too Many Theories and Not Enough Instruction”: Perceptions of Preservice Teacher Preparation for Literacy Teaching in Australian Schools. Literacy, 40(2), 66–78.Google Scholar
  18. Maor, D. (2003). The teacher’s role in developing interaction and reflection in an online learning community. Education Media International, 40(1), 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDonald, L., & White, P. (2005). Blended learning. In J. Clark & M. Maguire (Eds.), Challenges for the Profession: Perspectives and Directions for Teachers, Teaching and Teacher Education (pp. 428–436). Proceedings of the 12th International ISATT Conference, Sydney.Google Scholar
  20. Morris, D., & Langman, L. (2005). Networks of dissent: A typology of social movements in a global age. Information Technology, Education and Society, 6(2), 5–25.Google Scholar
  21. Nicols, M. (2003). A theory for eLearning. Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  22. Nutbean, M., Ryan, J., & Scott, A. (2003). Forging partnerships between schools and universities: The CLaSS classroom helper initiative. Learning Matters, 8(1), 42–45.Google Scholar
  23. O’Reilly, M., & Newton, D. (2002). Interaction online: Above and beyond requirements of assessment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), 57–70.Google Scholar
  24. Oliver, R. (2006). Exploring a technology-facilitated solution to cater for advanced students in large undergraduate classes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.Google Scholar
  26. Panko, M. (2002). Small group learning in online discussions: Staying in your own backyard or peering over the garden fence? Paper Presented at the Australian Society Computers in (ASCILITE).Google Scholar
  27. Richards, T., Richards, L., Fraser, D., & Barrington, T. (2000). NVivo: NUD*IST for Qualitative Research (Version 1.2) [CD Rom]. La Trobe University/QSR International Pty Ltd, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  28. Salmon, G. (2002). Online learning workshop. Paper Presented at the Conference Proceedings, 17th Australian Council for Computers in Education: Linking learners, Hobart.Google Scholar
  29. Scanlon, E., & Issroff, K. (2005). Activity theory and higher education: Evaluating learning technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 430–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simpson, A. (2006). Student Voices, Teachers’ Vibes and a Researchers View: Book Raps as a Model of E-Literacy. Darwin: Australian Literacy Educator’s Association.Google Scholar
  31. Sutherland, L., Marcus, G., & Jessup, A. (2005). From face-to-face to blended learning: Issues and challenges in redesigning a professional course. In A. Brew & C. Asmar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 Annual International Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia: Higher Education in a Changing World (pp. 551–558). Milperra, NSW: The University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  32. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses [Electronic version]. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thomas, M. (2002). Learning with in incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Victorian Curriculum Assessment Authority. (2006). Victorian essential learning standards. Retrieved 9 February 2006, from
  35. Wai-kit Ma, W., Andersson, R., & Streith, K. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. White, F., Daly, M., & Scott, K. (2006). Student evaluations of e- learning technologies in undergraduate psychology: A blended model for the future. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education conference: Whos learning? Whose technology? (pp. 863–870). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wong, A. (2007). Cyberself: Identity, language and stylisation on the internet. In D. Gibbs & K. Krause (Eds.), Cyberlines 2.0: Languages and Cultures of the Internet. Melbourne: James Nicholas Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Scott
  • Josephine Ryan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations