Skip to main content

Elearning in European Higher Education: An Analysis of Present Practice in Ireland, Portugal, and the UK, with Lessons for the Bologna Process

  • Chapter
Education Across Borders

Abstract

The Bologna Declaration has put in motion a series of reforms aimed at making European Higher Education more compatible and comparable, competitive and attractive for Europeans and for students and scholars from other continents. The result is to be a European Higher Education Area in which by the year 2010 students can choose from a wide and transparent range of high-quality courses. Reform, it is argued, was needed then, and it is still needed today, if Europe is to match the performance of the American and Asian systems. The European Commission was not directly involved in the initial work of the Bologna process though the Commission has since become directly involved in the process, through hosting meetings, providing consultations, and working documents as well as grant support for projects in the area of standardization of degree offerings, benchmarking, and quality assurance. As part of the Bologna process, the Commission now supports a large number of European projects (e.g. TEEP project) connected to quality assurance, standards, promotion of university offerings. The outcomes may make it easier for countries and institutions to recognize one another’s degrees and promote their own. The EU has also promoted a specific way of interacting with member states and institutions – the Open Method of Coordination (OMC). We argue in this chapter that the Commission should focus less on standardization and explore more ways of “communally constructing” knowledge in a European context. What the Bologna process is setting out to undertake, in our opinion, is to create limits on education, whereas the Open Method of Communication could, instead, liberate systems of education and move them forward. We look to three case studies of elearning experiments to provide lessons for learning across European borders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arora, A. (2005). The emerging offshore software industries and the United States economy. Brookings Trade Forum (pp. 399–409). Retrieved August 1, 2008, from http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/brookings_trade_forum/v2005/2005.1arora.html

  • Baker, J., Lynch, K., Cantillon, S., & Walsh, J. (2004). Equality: From theory to action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, L. (1995). Electronic highway or weaving loom? In F. Lockwood (Ed.). Open and distance education today (p. 27). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammack, P. (2006). The politics of global competitiveness. In Papers in the politics of global competitiveness, No. 1. Manchester: Institute for Global Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L. (2005). Strategies for building the global knowledge commons: Institutional repository and beyond. Presentation given at the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa http://hdl.handle.net/1807/4394

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp.453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Taoiseach. (2008). Strategy Statement 2008–2010. Retrieved August 1, 2008, from http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie/attached_files/Pdf%20files/Strategy%20Statement %202008-2010.pdf

  • European Commission. (2005a). Common Actions for Growth and Employment: The Community Lisbon Programme. COM (2005) 330 final, p.10. Retrieved May 28, 2008, from http://www.cas.cz/data/vav/vav-eu/com2005_0330en01.pdf

  • European Commission. (2005b). Europe’s Information Society, Thematic Portal. Retrieved May 30 2008 from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/2005/index_en.htm

  • European Commission. (2005c). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Common Actions for Growth and Employment: The Community Lisbon Programme, COM (2005) 330 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007a). From Bergen to London: The Contribution of the European Commission to the Bologna Process. p. 1. Retrieved May 7, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/educ/bologna/report06.pdf

  • European Commission. (2007b). European Information Society for growth and employment. In A comprehensive strategy for the information society 2005–2010: What is i2010? Retrieved May 7, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/introduction/index_en.htm

  • European Commission. (2008). Education and Training: ECTS European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System. Retrieved June 25, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu./education/programmes/socrates/ects/index_en.html

  • Frederickson, N., Reed, P., & Clifford, V. (2005). Evaluating web-supported learning versus lecture-based teaching: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Higher Education, 50(4), 654–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE. (2007). Strategic plan 2006–2011. Retrieved June 25, 2007, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2007/07_09/07_09.pdf

  • Holmes, B., FitzGibbon, A., Savage, T., Mehan, S., & Tangney, B. (2001). Communal constructivism: Students constructing learning for as well as with others. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2001 (pp. 3114–3119). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, B., & Gardner, J. (2005). E-Learning concepts and practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imrie, R. (2004). From universal to inclusive design in the built environment. In J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes & C. Thomas (Eds.). Disabling barriers – enabling environments (pp. 279–284). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Society Commission. (2005). Learning to Innovate: Reperceiving the Global Information Society. (p. 3). Retrieved June 5, 2008, from http://www.isc.ie

  • Irish Government. (2002). New Connections: A Strategy to Realise the Potential of the Information Society. (p. i, 1, 39). Retrieved June 8, 2008, from http://www.isc.ie

  • Lave, J., & Wegner, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leask, M., & Younie, S. (2001). Communal constructivist theory: Information and communications technology pedagogy and internationalisation of the curriculum. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10, 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luarillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. New York, NY: Routledge/Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2) 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Qualification Authority of Ireland. (2003). Milestones in Reform of Education & Training Qualifications. Retrieved July 25, 2008, from http://www.nqai.ie/news_2003.html

  • Preston, C. (2007). Braided learning: Promoting active professionals in education. In C. Haythornthwaite, R. Andrews, B. C. Bruce, M. M. Kazmer, R. Montague & C. Preston (Eds.). First Monday: Theories and Models Of Online Learning (Vol. 12, No. 8). Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_8/haythorn/

  • Pugach, M. C. (2001). The stories we choose to tell: Fulfilling the promise of qualitative research in special education, (p. 443). Exceptional Children, 67, 439–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, M. (2005). HEFCE strategy for elearning. (p. 1). Retrieved June 12, 2007, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05_12/

  • Tahkokallio, P. (2004). Paradigm shifts shape the future: Design for all in service sustainability. In G. Craddock, L. McCormack, R. Reilly & H. Knopps (Eds.). Assistive Technology – Shaping the Future. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Manchester. (2008). Elearning Maturity Model. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://elearning.heacademy.ac.uk/wiki/index.php/EMM

  • Williams, J., Blackwell, S., & Whelan, B. (2004). ESRI Survey Assessment of the Information Society in Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

Additional References and Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holmes, B., Huet, I., Leahy, D., Gardner, J., Dolan, D., Tavares, J. (2009). Elearning in European Higher Education: An Analysis of Present Practice in Ireland, Portugal, and the UK, with Lessons for the Bologna Process. In: Fegan, J., Field, M.H. (eds) Education Across Borders. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9411-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics