Skip to main content

Popper and Sen on Rationality and Economics: Two (Independent) Wrong Turns Can Be Remedied with the Same Program

  • Conference paper
Rethinking Popper

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 272))

Karl Popper and Amartya Sen have developed social theories, which are very close to each other, though neither has taken notice of the other. The independent programs they propose for the development of their theories go astray, because they build on standard economic methods, albeit in different ways. A better approach for the development of each program can be found by using Popper's important, but in the methodology of the social sciences hitherto ignored discovery, that rationality is social. Important contributions of Sen to economic theory may then be developed in ways which also contribute to Popper's social theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Agassi, Joseph. 1981. Rationality and tu quoque Argument. Science and Society, pp. 465–476. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph and Jarvie, Ian (eds.). 1987. Rationality: The Critical View. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph and Laor, Nathaniel. 1990. Diagnosis: Philosophical and Medical Perspectives, Episteme. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie, Ian. 2001. The Republic of Science. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Ropopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge (first published 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 1957. The Poverty of Historicism, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 1985. The Rationality Principle. In Popper Selections, ed. David Miller. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, Hans. 1930–1931. Comment on Popper's ‘Ein Kriterium des empirischen Charakters theoretischer Systeme’. Erkenntnis, I: 427–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segré, Michael. 1991. In the Wake of Galileo. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1960. Choice of Techniques. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1986. Food, Economics and Entitlements. Helsinki: Wider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 2000. Development as Freedom. New York: Achor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 2004. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard (eds.). 1982. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John. 1985. The Road Through ürzburg, Vienna and Gottingen. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 15: 487–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John. 1987. Selz, Popper and Agassi: On the Unification of Psychology, Methodology and Pedagogy. Interchange 18: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John. 1988. Külpe, Bühler, Popper. In Karl Bühler's Theory of Language, ed. Achim Eschbach, pp. 327–347. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins/Republic in the Rivivalist: http://www.the-rathouse.com/Wettersten_on_Kulpe_Buhler_and_Popper.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John. 1990. How Can Psychology and Methodology Be Integrated? Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 21: 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John, The Roots of Critical Rationalism, Schriftenreihe zur Philosophie Karl R. Poppers und des kritischen Rationalismus, Kurt Salamun (Ed.) (Amsterdam und Atlanta: Rodopi, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John, ‘Eine aktuelle Aufgabe für den kritischen Rationalismus und die Soziologie’, in Hans-Jürgen Wendel und Volker Gadenne (eds) Kritik und Rationalität (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr(Paul Siebeck) 1996), pp. 183–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John, ‘New Insights on Young Popper’, Journal for The History of Ideas, 66, 4, Oct. 2005, pp. 603–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John, How Do Institutions Steer Events? An Inquiry into the Limits and Possibilities of Rational Thought and Action (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Co., 2006a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John, review-essay of I.C. Jarvie, The Republic of Science, Philosophy of Science, 73, 1, Jan., 2006b, 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John, ‘Towards a New Theory of the Closed Society’, in eds. Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford, and David Miller, Karl Popper, A Centenary Assessment, Vol. I, Life and Times, and Values in a World of Facts (Ashgate, 2006c): pp. 251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John, ‘Popper's Theory of the Closed Society Conflicts with his Theory of Research’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37, 2, June 2007a, pp. 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John, ‘Philosophical Anthropology Can Help Social Scientists Learn from Empirical Tests’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 37, 3, Sept. 2007b, pp. 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wettersten, J. (2009). Popper and Sen on Rationality and Economics: Two (Independent) Wrong Turns Can Be Remedied with the Same Program. In: Parusniková, Z., Cohen, R.S. (eds) Rethinking Popper. Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science, vol 272. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics