Karl Popper and Amartya Sen have developed social theories, which are very close to each other, though neither has taken notice of the other. The independent programs they propose for the development of their theories go astray, because they build on standard economic methods, albeit in different ways. A better approach for the development of each program can be found by using Popper's important, but in the methodology of the social sciences hitherto ignored discovery, that rationality is social. Important contributions of Sen to economic theory may then be developed in ways which also contribute to Popper's social theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Agassi, Joseph. 1981. Rationality and tu quoque Argument. Science and Society, pp. 465–476. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Agassi, Joseph and Jarvie, Ian (eds.). 1987. Rationality: The Critical View. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Agassi, Joseph and Laor, Nathaniel. 1990. Diagnosis: Philosophical and Medical Perspectives, Episteme. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Jarvie, Ian. 2001. The Republic of Science. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Ropopi.
Popper, Karl Raimund. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge (first published 1945).
Popper, Karl Raimund. 1957. The Poverty of Historicism, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Popper, Karl Raimund. 1985. The Rationality Principle. In Popper Selections, ed. David Miller. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1930–1931. Comment on Popper's ‘Ein Kriterium des empirischen Charakters theoretischer Systeme’. Erkenntnis, I: 427–428.
Segré, Michael. 1991. In the Wake of Galileo. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1960. Choice of Techniques. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sen, Amartya. 1986. Food, Economics and Entitlements. Helsinki: Wider.
Sen, Amartya. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sen, Amartya. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon.
Sen, Amartya. 2000. Development as Freedom. New York: Achor.
Sen, Amartya. 2004. Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge: Belknap.
Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard (eds.). 1982. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wettersten, John. 1985. The Road Through ürzburg, Vienna and Gottingen. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 15: 487–506.
Wettersten, John. 1987. Selz, Popper and Agassi: On the Unification of Psychology, Methodology and Pedagogy. Interchange 18: 1–13.
Wettersten, John. 1988. Külpe, Bühler, Popper. In Karl Bühler's Theory of Language, ed. Achim Eschbach, pp. 327–347. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins/Republic in the Rivivalist: http://www.the-rathouse.com/Wettersten_on_Kulpe_Buhler_and_Popper.htm.
Wettersten, John. 1990. How Can Psychology and Methodology Be Integrated? Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 21: 293–308.
Wettersten, John, The Roots of Critical Rationalism, Schriftenreihe zur Philosophie Karl R. Poppers und des kritischen Rationalismus, Kurt Salamun (Ed.) (Amsterdam und Atlanta: Rodopi, 1992).
Wettersten, John, ‘Eine aktuelle Aufgabe für den kritischen Rationalismus und die Soziologie’, in Hans-Jürgen Wendel und Volker Gadenne (eds) Kritik und Rationalität (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr(Paul Siebeck) 1996), pp. 183–212.
Wettersten, John, ‘New Insights on Young Popper’, Journal for The History of Ideas, 66, 4, Oct. 2005, pp. 603–631.
Wettersten, John, How Do Institutions Steer Events? An Inquiry into the Limits and Possibilities of Rational Thought and Action (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Co., 2006a)
Wettersten, John, review-essay of I.C. Jarvie, The Republic of Science, Philosophy of Science, 73, 1, Jan., 2006b, 108–121.
Wettersten, John, ‘Towards a New Theory of the Closed Society’, in eds. Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford, and David Miller, Karl Popper, A Centenary Assessment, Vol. I, Life and Times, and Values in a World of Facts (Ashgate, 2006c): pp. 251–262.
Wettersten, John, ‘Popper's Theory of the Closed Society Conflicts with his Theory of Research’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37, 2, June 2007a, pp. 185–209.
Wettersten, John, ‘Philosophical Anthropology Can Help Social Scientists Learn from Empirical Tests’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 37, 3, Sept. 2007b, pp. 295–318.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wettersten, J. (2009). Popper and Sen on Rationality and Economics: Two (Independent) Wrong Turns Can Be Remedied with the Same Program. In: Parusniková, Z., Cohen, R.S. (eds) Rethinking Popper. Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science, vol 272. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9337-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9338-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)