Popper's Thesis of the Unity of Scientific Method: Method Versus Techniques
- 1.1k Downloads
Recently some philosophers have claimed that Popper's conception of the unity of method in science presents some serious problems. According to these philosophers, there is a clear divergence in his defense for the unity of scientific methodology and his thesis that the method of situational analysis or the logic of the situation constitutes “the proper method of the social sciences”. I will show that these criticisms can be met by using certain distinctions that have been fashioned in contemporary philosophy of science, among others, the distinction between scientific method and scientific techniques and also between the context of discovery and the context of validation.
KeywordsNatural Science Scientific Method Critical Discussion Situational Model Open Society
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Eidlin, Fred. 2003. Matching Popperian theory to practice. In Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years, eds. Ian Jarvie and Sandra Pralong, 203–207. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gonzalez, Wenceslao. 2004. The many faces of Popper's methodological approach to prediction. In Karl Popper. Critical Appraisals, eds. Philip Catton and Graham Macdonald, 78–98. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gorton, William. 2006. Karl Popper and the Social Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Popper, Karl Raimund. 1957. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Popper, Karl Raimund. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
- Popper, Karl Raimund. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Popper, Karl Raimund. 1992. In Search of a Better World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Popper, Karl Raimund. 1994. The Myth of the Framework, ed. Mark Notturno. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rudner, Richard. 1966. Philosophy of Social Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar