Popper's falsifiability criterion of demarcation is critically examined, both as a proposal with an independent epistemological rationale and as a condition which modern science is supposed to satisfy, and some famous objections to it are discussed. While possessing an irresistible epistemological appeal, an analysis of the objections arising from the Duhem problem shows that there is an immediate conflict, and not a mutual support, between Popper's methodological approach to falsifiablity in Logik der Forschung and his formal criterion of demarcation. Moreover, and partly owing to this unnoticed conflict, his classic defence of falsi-ficationism as an alternative to conventionalism is shown to rely on assumptions linking testability with meaning which, contrary to what is sometimes supposed, were shared by Popper with some of his positivist and conventionalist targets, and later superseded by his realist and objectivist conception of scientific statements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agassi, Joseph. 1983. Theoretical Bias in Evidence: A Historical Sketch. Philosophica, 31(1), 7–24. Page numbers correspond to the slightly modified online version: http://www.tau. ac.il/~agass/joseph-papers/bias.pdf
Agassi, Joseph. 1999. Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Popper's Popular Critics. Anuar, 7, 5–25. Page numbers correspond to the online version: http://www.tau.ac.il/~agass/joseph-papers/flowers.pdf
Carnap, Rudolf. 1932. Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache. Erkenntnis, 2(4), 219–241.
Carnap, Rudolf. 1936–1937. Testability and Meaning. Philosophy of Science, 3, 4
Carnap, Rudolf. 1963. Replies and Systematic Expositions. In (Schilpp 1963, pp. 859–1013). d'Alembert, Jean Le Rond. 1770. Mélanges de literature, d'histoire, et de philosophie, Amsterdam: Zacharie Chatelain & Fils.
Frank, Philipp. 1941. Between Physics and Philosophy. CambrIDge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Frank, Philipp. 1988. Das Kausalgesetz und seine Grenzen, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (First edition 1932).
Gillies, Donald. 1993. Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century. Four Central Themes. Oxford: Blackwell.
Grelling, Kurt. 1937. Karl Popper. Logik der Forschung. Theoria, 3, 134–139.
Hempel, Carl Gustav. 1945. Studies in the Logic of Confirmation. Mind, 54, 1–26, 97–121.
Hempel, Carl Gustav. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.
Kneale, William. 1974. The Demarcation of Science. In (Schilpp 1974, pp. 205–217).
Lakatos, Imre. 1973. Science and Pseudoscience. Radio Lecture, Open University. Reprinted with changes as Introduction to Lakatos 1978a.
Lakatos, Imre. 1978a. Philosophical Papers. Volume 1, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, eds. John Worrall and Gregory Currie. CambrIDge: CambrIDge University Press.
Lakatos, Imre. 1978b. Philosophical Papers. In Mathematics, Science and Epistemology, eds. John Worrall and Gregory Currie. CambrIDge: CambrIDge University Press.
Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan. (eds.). 1968. Problems in the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Maxwell, Grover. 1974. Corroboration Without Demarcation. In (Schilpp 1974, pp. 292–321).
Miller, DavID. 1994. Critical Rationalism. A Restatement and Defence. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Miller, DavID. 2006. Out of Error. Further Essays on Critical Rationalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Musgrave, Alan. 1968. On a Demarcation Dispute. In (Lakatos and Musgrave 1968, pp. 78–88).
O'Hear, Anthony. 1980. Karl Popper. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Popper, Karl Raimund. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Popper, Karl Raimund. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Popper, Karl Raimund. 1968. Remarks on the Problem of Demarcation and of Rationality. In (Lakatos and Musgrave 1968, pp. 88–102).
Popper, Karl Raimund.1974a. Replies to My Critics. In Schilpp (1974, pp. 961–1197).
Popper, Karl Raimund. 1974b. Conocimiento Objetivo. MadrID: Tecnos.
Popper, Karl Raimund. 1983. Realism and the Aim of Science. London: Routledge.
Popper, Karl. Raimund. 1998. Los dos problemas fundamentales de la teorÍa del conocimiento. MadrID: Tecnos. (Spanish translation of Die beIDen Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.)
Putnam, Hilary. 1974. The Corroboration of Theories. In (Schilpp 1974).
Putnam, Hilary. 1979. Retrospective Note (1978): A Critic Replies to His Philosopher. In Philosophy as It Is, Ted Honderich and Myles Burnyeat (eds.), pp. 377–380. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
Quine, Willard. 1953. From a Logical Point of View. CambrIDge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Radnitzky, Gerhard and Seiffert, Helmut. 1989. Handlexikon zur Wissenschaftstheorie. München: Ehrenwirth Verlag.
Russell, Bertrand Arthur William. 1940. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. London: Allen & Unwin.
Russell, Bertrand Arthur William. 1966. Philosophical Essays, London, Allen & Unwin.
Schilpp, Paul Arthur (ed.). 1963. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, IL: Open Court. (ed.). 1974. The Philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Stegmüller, Wolfgang. 1978. Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag (sixth edition).
Williams, Donald. 1938. The Realistic Interpretation of Scientific Sentences. Erkenntnis, 7(3), 169–178, University of Buenos Aires
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rosende, D.L. (2009). Popper on Refutability: Some Philosophical and Historical Questions. In: Parusniková, Z., Cohen, R.S. (eds) Rethinking Popper. Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science, vol 272. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9338-8_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9337-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9338-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)