Skip to main content

The Maze of Tolerance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Religion and Education ((IHRE,volume 4))

Abstract

Being tolerant is considered important by most people. Tolerance is about navigating in societies of increased differences – societies where neighbors, colleagues, groups of people, even children and spouses are of different opinions and live in a different way. But what does, however, tolerance mean? The process of identifying it more precisely often leads to confusion and disagreement. Tolerance is often understood as a liberal value, but this chapter identifies three different conceptions of tolerance: Tolerance as forbearance, tolerance as being unprejudiced, and tolerance as openness. These understandings of tolerance have different implications for inter-religious education and dialogue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To the following, see Oxford Latin Dictionary (1976: 1946–1947).

References

  • Afdal, G. (2006). Tolerance and curriculum. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, R. P. (1997). On the differences between non-moral and moral conceptions of toleration: The case for toleration as an individual virtue. In M. A. Razaavi & D. Ambuel (Eds.), Philosophy, religion and the question of intolerance. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, B. (1971). Political theory and practice. London: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, A. E. (2002). Toleration as recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Justice and solidarity: On the discussion concerning stage 6. In E. W., Thomas (Ed.), The moral domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyd, D. (Ed.). (1996). Toleration. an elusive virtue. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J., & P. Nicolson.(1992). Philosophy and the practice of toleration. In J. Horton & N. Peter, (Eds.), Toleration: Philosophy and practice. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove. Paternalism and conflict in gender, class and race relation. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1996). Two models of pluralism and tolerance. In D. Heyd (Ed.), Toleration. An elusive virtue. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1689/1991). A letter concerning toleration. In J. Horton & S. Mendus (Eds.), Aspects of toleration. Philosophical studies. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1965). Repressive tolerance. In R. P. Wolff, B. Moore Jr. & H. Marcuse (Ed.), A critique of pure tolerance. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendus, S. (1989). Toleration and the limits of liberalism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1988). Socialism and toleration. In S. Mendus (Ed.), Justifying toleration. Conceptual and historical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdiek, H. (2001). Tolerance. between forbearance and acceptance. Landham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Latin Dictionary (1976). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D. D. (1988). The intolerable. In S. Mendus (Ed.), Justifying toleration: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (1988). Autonomy, toleration, and the harm principle. In S. Mendus (Ed.), Justifying toleration. Conceptual and historical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. L., James P., George E. M. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, P. W. (1997). Tolerance and education. Learning to live with diversity and difference. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1997). On toleration. New Haven, CT: Yale UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster’s comprehensive dictionary of the English language (2003). Naples, Italy: Typhoon International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, R. (1998). Political tolerance. Balancing community and diversity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geir Afdal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Afdal, G. (2010). The Maze of Tolerance. In: Engebretson, K., de Souza, M., Durka, G., Gearon, L. (eds) International Handbook of Inter-religious Education. International Handbooks of Religion and Education, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9260-2_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics