Skip to main content

Overview of Statistical Tests for Unexploded Ordnance Detection

  • Conference paper
Book cover Unexploded Ordnance Detection and Mitigation
  • 1240 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we outline the statistical procedures that can be employed for the detection of unexploded ordnance (UXO). Phenomenological modeling is first developed to relate the collected data to a sensor's feature parameters, which in turn allow for physics-based signal processing. Starting with the Bayesian framework, we introduce minimax and robust detection that do not require prior probabilities and distributional information on the measurement uncertainty, respectively. Nonparametric tests that perform well for broad classes of distributions are also presented. Finally, the generalized likelihood ratio test is described as a joint estimation-detection method which first estimates the feature parameters and then tests for the presence-absence of the UXO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Carin, H. Yu, Y. Dalichaouch, A. R. Perry, P. V. Czipott and C. E. Baum, “On the wideband EMI response of a rotationally symmetric permeable and conducting target,” IEEE Transac tions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 1206–1213, June 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. -C. Chen and L. Peters, “Buried unexploded ordnance identification via complex natural resonances,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 45, No. 11, pp. 1645–1654, November 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Fijany, J. B. Collier and A. Citak, “Recent advances in unexploded ordnance (UXO) detec tion using airborne ground penetrating SAR,” Proceedings of the Aerospace Conference, 1999, pp. 429–441. Snowmass, Colorado, USA, March 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. I. Halman, K. A. Shubert and G. T. Ruck, “SAR processing of ground-penetrating data for buried UXO detection: results from a surface-based system,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 46, No. 7, pp. 1023–1027, July 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Hu, S. L. Tantum and L. M. Collins, “EMI-based classification of multiple closely spaced subsurface objects via independent component analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 42, No. 11, pp. 2544–2554, September 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. J. Huber, Robust Statistics, New York: Wiley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Kazakos and P. Papantoni-Kazakos, Detection and Estimation, New York: Computer Sci ence Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. V. Nelson, C. C. Cooperman, W. Schneider, D. S. Wenstrand and D. G. Smith, “Wide band width time-domain electromagnetic sensor for metal target classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 1129–1138, June 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. H. Nelson and J. R. MacDonald, “Multisensor towed array detection system for UXO detection,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 1139–1145, June 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. L. Tantum, Y. Yu and L. M. Collins, “Bayesian mitigation of sensor position errors to improve unexploded ordnance detection,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 103–107, January 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. van Waard, S. van der Baan and K. W. A. van Dongen, “Experimental data of a directional borehole radar system for UXO detection,” Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Delft, The Netherlands, June 2004, pp. 225–228.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Wilcoxon, “Individual comparisons by ranking methods,” Biometrics, Vol. 1, 1945, pp. 80–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Williams, C. Wang, X. Liao and L. Carin, “Classification of unexploded ordnance using incomplete multisensor multiresolution data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 45, No. 7, pp. 2364–2373, July 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Q. Zhang, W. Al-Muaimy and Y. Huang, “Detection of deeply buried UXO using CPT mag netometers,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 410–417, February 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Zhang, L. Collins, H. Yu, C. E. Baum and L. Carin, “Sensing of unexploded ordnance with magnetometer and induction data: theory and signal processing,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 1005–1015, May 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Deliç, H. (2009). Overview of Statistical Tests for Unexploded Ordnance Detection. In: Byrnes, J. (eds) Unexploded Ordnance Detection and Mitigation. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9253-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics