Norway: Strong State Support of Research in University Colleges

Chapter
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 31)

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, the research mission of university colleges in Norway has been increasingly emphasised. This development has several reasons: a wish by colleges and their staff to conduct research, an expectation by state authorities that colleges should engage in such activity and pressure from regional stakeholders that the colleges should contribute in innovation and development processes at the local level. Even though the extent of research in these institutions is relatively modest in comparison to the universities, the colleges have progressively developed organisational structures to support and fund this activity, and the research function will definitely become more important in the years to come. An important reason is that, since 2004, these colleges have had the opportunity to apply for accreditation to university status by fulfilling given criteria related to research and doctoral education.

Keywords

Expense Pyramid OECD 

References

  1. Kyvik, S. (2002). The merger of non-university colleges in Norway. Higher Education, 44, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980–2000. Scientometrics, 58, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kyvik, S. (2008). FoU-strategi ved statlige høgskoler. Oslo: NIFU STEP.Google Scholar
  4. Kyvik, S. (2009a). The dynamics of change in higher education. Expansion and contraction in an organisational field. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Kyvik, S. (2009b). Allocating time resources for research between academic staff: The case of Norwegian university colleges. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kyvik, S., & Skodvin, O.J. (2003). Research in the non-university higher education sector – tensions and dilemmas. Higher Education, 45, 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kyvik, S., & Smeby, J.C. (2004). The academic workplace. Country report Norway. In J. Enders, & E. de Weert (Eds.), The international attractiveness of the academic workplace in Europe (pp. 310–331). Frankfurt/Main: Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
  8. Larsen, I. M. (2000). Research policy at Norwegian universities – Walking the tightrope between internal and external interests. European Journal of Education, 35, 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Larsen, I. M., & Kyvik, S. (2006). 12 år etter høgskolereformen. En statusrapport om FOU ved statlige høgskoler. Oslo: NIFU STEP.Google Scholar
  10. Larsen, I. M., & Langfeldt, L. (2005). Profiling comprehensiveness? Strategy formulation and effects of strategic programmes at traditional universities. In Å. Gornitzka, M. Kogan, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education (pp. 343–361). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. NOU. (2008). Sett under ett: Ny struktur i høyere utdanning. Norges Offentlige Utredninger 2008:3. Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste.Google Scholar
  12. OECD. (2002). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Frascati manual 2002: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  13. OECD. (2006). Thematic review of tertiary education – Norway – country note. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  14. Olsen, T. B., Kyvik, S., & Hovdhaugen, E. (2005). The promotion to full professor – through competition or by individual competence? Tertiary Education and Management, 11, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU STEP)OsloNorway
  2. 2.Faculty of Social SciencesOslo University CollegeOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations