Flux Control Analysis of the Rate of Photosynthetic CO2 Assimilation

  • Ian E. Woodrow
Part of the Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration book series (AIPH, volume 29)

Metabolic flux control analysis offers an opportunity to understand how fluxes are determined and thus how they can be increased. Enzymes are assigned a control coefficient (usually between zero and one) which is a measure of the degree to which the flux is sensitive to small changes in enzyme concentration. This chapter examines research on the application of control analysis to the photosynthetic system of C3 plants, specifically the net rate of CO2 fixation. Control coefficients have been measured for a number of the enzymes, typically by reducing the concentration of a target enzyme in transgenic plants then comparing their flux and enzyme concentrations to those of the wild type. There have been surprisingly many difficulties with this approach. Firstly, many transgenic plants have markedly lower enzyme concentrations than the wild type, so it has been difficult to make accurate estimations of the enzyme-flux relationship in the vicinity of the wild type value. Second, natural variation, compounded by variation due to a lack of precision in measurements, has often required a very large number of replicates in order to detect significant values. Many studies have not used sufficient replication. Third, confounding variables, such as ontogenetic variation and untargeted changes in the concentration of other enzymes, have not always been identified and taken into account. As a consequence of these challenges, there are few studies in which control coefficients have been detected with a high degree of certainty. This situation is set to improve, however, with the use of transgenic plants with both an increased and decreased target enzyme concentration. Several such studies have now been published, and in two cases, estimates of the control coefficients have been markedly improved.


Transgenic Plant Enzyme Concentration Transgenic Tobacco Plant Assimilation Rate Leaf Area Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cornish-Bowden A and Hofmeyr JHS (1994) Determination of control coefficients in intact metabolic systems. Biochem J 298: 367–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cowan IR (1986) Economics of carbon fixation in higher plants. In: Givnish, TJ (ed) On the Economy of Plant Form and Function, pp 133–170. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Haake V, Zrenner R, Sonnewald U and Stitt M (1998) A moderate decrease of plastid aldolase activity inhibits photosynthesis, alters the levels of sugars and starch, and inhibits growth of potato plants. Plant J 14: 147–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haake V, Geiger M, Walch-Liu P, Engels C, Zrenner R and Stitt M (1999) Changes in aldolase activity in wild-type potato plants are important for acclimation to growth irra-diance and carbon dioxide concentration, because plastid aldolase exerts control over the ambient rate of photosynthesis across a range of growth conditions. Plant J 17: 479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hajirezaei MR, Peisker M, Tschiersch H, Palatnik JF, Valle EM, Carrillo N and Sonnewald U (2002) Small changes in the activity of NADP+-dependent ferredoxin oxi-doreductase lead to impaired plant growth and restrict photosynthetic activity in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant J 29: 281–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hammond ET, Andrews TJ, Mott KA and Woodrow IE (1998) Regulation of Rubisco activation in antisense plants of tobacco containing reduced levels of Rubisco activase. Plant J 14: 101–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harrison EP, Willingham NM, Lloyd JC and Raines CA (1998) Reduced sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase levels in transgenic tobacco lead to decreased photosynthetic capacity and altered carbohydrate accumulation. Planta 204: 27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Häusler RE, Schlieben NH and Flügge UI (2000) Control of carbon partitioning and photosynthesis by the triose phosphate/phosphate translocator in transgenic tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum). II. Assessment of control coefficients of the triose phosphate/phosphate transloca-tor. Planta 210: 383–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heinrich R and Rapoport TA (1974) A linear steady state treatment of enzymatic chains. Eur J Biochem 42: 89–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henkes S, Sonnewald U, Badur R, Flachmann R and Stitt M (2001) A small decrease of plastid transketolase activity in antisense tobacco transformants has dramatic effects on photosynthesis and phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 13: 535–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang C-Z, Quick WP, Aired R, Kliebenstein D, Rodermel SR (1994) Antisense inhibiton of Rubisco activase expression. Plant J 5: 787–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kacser H and Burns JA (1973) The control of flux. Symp Soc Exp Biol 27: 65–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirschhoff H, Horstmann S and Weis E (2000) Control of the photosynthetic electron transport by PQ diffusion microdomains in thylakoids of higher plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1459: 148–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kossman J, Sonnewald U and Willmitzer L (1994) Reduction of the chloroplastic fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase in transgenic potato plants impairs photosynthesis and plant growth. Plant J 6: 637–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lefebvre S, Lawson T, Zakhleniuk OV, Lloyd JC and Raines CA (2005) Increased sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase activity in transgenic tobacco plants stimulates photosynthesis and growth from an early stage in development. Plant Physiol 138: 451–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miyagawa Y, Tamoi M, and Shigeoka S (2001) Overexpres-sion of a cyanobacterial fructose-1,6-/sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase in tobacco enhances photosynthesis and growth. Nature Biotech 19: 965–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ölçer H, Lloyd JC, and Raines CA (2001) Photosyn-thetic capacity is differentially affected by reductions in sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase activity during leaf development in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Physiol 125: 982–989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paul MJ, Knight JS, Habash D, Parry MAJ, Lawlor DW, Barnes SA, Loynes A and Gray JC (1995) Reduction in phosphoribulokinase activity by antisense RNA reduces CO2 assimilation and growth in low irradiance. Plant J 7: 535–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paul MJ, Driscoll SP, Andralojc PJ, Knight JS, Gray JC and Lawlor DW (2000) Decrease of phosphoribuloki-nase activity by antisense RNA in transgenic tobacco: definition of the light environment under which phos-phoribulokinase is not in large excess. Planta 211: 112– 119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pettersson G (1996) Errors associated with experimental determinations of enzyme flux control coefficients. J Theor Biol 179: 191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pettersson G and Ryde-Pettersson U (1988) A mathematical model of the Calvin photosynthesis cycle. Eur J Biochem 175: 661–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Portis AR Jr (2003) Rubisco activase — Rubisco's catalytic chaperone. Photosynth Res 75: 11–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Price GD, Von Caemmerer S, Evans JR, Yu JW, Lloyd J, Oja V, Kell P, Harrison K, Gallagher A and Badger MR (1994) Specific reduction of chloroplast carbonic anhy-drase activity by antisense RNA in transgenic tobacco plants has a minor effect on photosynthetic CO2 assimilation. Planta 193: 331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Price GD, Evans JR, Von Caemmerer S, Yu JW and Badger MR (1995a) Specific reduction of chloroplast glycer-aldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity by antisense RNA reduces CO2 assimilation via a reduction in ribulose bisphosphate regeneration in transgenic tobacco plants. Planta 195: 369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Price GD, Yu JW, Von Caemmerer S, Evans JR, Chow WS, Anderson JM, Hurry V and Badger MR (1995b) Chloroplast cytochrome b(6)/f and ATP synthase complexes in tobacco — transformation with antisense RNA against nuclear encoded transcripts for the Rieske FeS and ATP-delta polypeptides. Aust J Plant Physiol 22: 285–297Google Scholar
  26. Price GD, Von Caemmerer S, Evans JR, Siebke K, Anderson JM and Badger MR (1998) Photosynthesis is strongly reduced by antisense suppression of chloroplastic cytochrome bf complex in transgenic tobacco. Aust J Plant Physiol 25: 445–452Google Scholar
  27. Quick WP, Fichtner K, Schulze E-D, Wendler R, Leegood RC, Mooney H, Rodermel SR, Bogorad L and Stitt M (1992) Decreased ribulose-l,5-bisphosphate carboxy-lase/oxygenase in transgenic tobacco transformed with “antisense” rbcS. IV. Impact on photosynthesis and plant growth altered nitrogen supply. Planta 188: 522–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Raines CA (2003) The Calvin cycle revisited. Photosynth Res 75: 1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raines CA, Harrison EP, Ölçer H and Lloyd JC (2000) Investigating the role of the thiol-regulated enzyme sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase in the control of photosynthesis. Physiol Plant 110: 303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Small JR (1993) Flux control coefficients determined by inhibitor titration: the design and analysis of experiments to reduce errors. Biochem J 296: 423–433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Small JR and Kacser H (1993) Responses of metabolic systems to large changes in enzyme activities and effectors. 1. The linear treatment of unbranced chains. Eur J Biochem 213: 613–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stitt M and Schultze E-D (1994) Does Rubisco control the rate of photosynthesis and plant growth? An exercise in molecular ecophysiology. Plant Cell Environ 17: 465–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stitt M and Sonnewald U (1995) Regulation of metabolism in transgenic plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 46: 341–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Suzuki Y, Ohkubo M, Hatakeyama H, Ohashi K, Yoshizawa R, Kojima S, Hayakawa T, Yamaya T, Mae T and Makino A (2007) Increased Rubisco content in transgenic rice transformed with the ‘sense’ rbcS gene. Plant Cell Physiol 48: 626–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tamoi M, Nagaoka M, Miyagawa Y and Shigeoka S (2006) Contribution of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase to the photosynthetic rate and carbon flow in the Calvin cycle in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Physiol 47: 380–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas S and Fell DA (1994) Metabolic control analysis — sensitivity of control coefficients to experimentally determined variables. J Theor Biol 167: 175–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Woodrow IE (1986) Control of the rate of photosynthetic carbon dioxide fixation. Biochim Biophys Acta 851: 181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woodrow IE and Berry JA (1988) Enzymatic regulation of photosynthetic CO2 fixation in C3 plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 39: 533–594Google Scholar
  39. Woodrow IE and Mott KA (1988) A quantitative assessment of the degree to which RuBP carboxylase/oxygenase limits the steady state rate of photosynthesis during sun-shade acclimation of Helianthus annuus. Aust J Plant Physiol 15: 253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Woodrow IE and Mott KA (1993) Modelling C3 photosynthesis: a sensitivity analysis of the photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle. Planta 191: 421–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Woodrow IE, Ball JT and Berry JA (1990) Control of photosynthetic carbon dioxide fixation by the boundary layer, stomata and ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxy-lase/oxygenase. Plant Cell Environ 13: 339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu HR, Li LB, Jing YX and Kuang TY (2007) Over- and antisense expressions of the large isoform of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase gene in Oryza sativa affect the photosynthetic capacity. Photosyn-thetica 45: 194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian E. Woodrow
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BotanyThe University of MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations