Environmental Considerations for Common Burial Site Selection After Pandemic Events


In light of the increasing threat of an avian flu pandemic in the UK, the Home Office have been investigating a range of methods for managing the potential problem of excess deaths that could exceed the capabilities of existing burial and funeral facilities. There is currently unprecedented pressure on the Government to find an environmentally, ethically, socially and economically sound solution to the problem of disposal of bodies. The use of common burials or mass interments has been mentioned as a possible means for disposal of the ‘excess deaths’ that may be manifest. This chapter examines the potential environmental considerations and consequences of the development and utilisation of such mass burials in both the short and long term. Structured risk management approaches, including source-pathway-receptor analysis of the potential hazards, are reviewed. Such research is informed by previous incidents such as the UK Foot and Mouth Crisis of 2001, where large numbers of animal carcasses were buried in mass graves that would be analogous to those after a human pandemic in terms of environmental impact. It also draws from previous environmental waste management research and strategies that are in place to mitigate the environmental impact of other large waste disposal mechanisms, such as landfill sites. Factors which should be considered when selecting a site for the purpose of constructing large common burial pits such as body decomposition, soil characteristics, the potential for groundwater contamination, vegetation and ecology, and the practicality of implementing contingency or mitigation measures are reviewed. Some recommendations are given for common grave site selection through analysis of soil characteristics, the application of soil databases, and how existing taphonomic knowledge may inform these issues.


Landfill Site Burial Site Mass Grave Groundwater Vulnerability Burial Ground 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson I (Ed.) (2002). Foot and Mouth Disease 2001: Lessons To Be Learned Inquiry Report. The Stationery Office, London, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Bagchi A (2004). Design of Landfills and Integrated Solid Waste Management. Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Bouwer H (1978). Groundwater Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  4. British Geological Survey (2007). Digital Geological Map of Great Britain 1:50,000 Scale (DiGMapGB-50) Data Version 4.16. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.Google Scholar
  5. Buss S, Herbert A, Morgan P and Thornton S (2003). Review of ammonium attenuation in soil and groundwater. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 37:347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canadian Content (2008). Rotting Corpses Forces Doomsday Group Out of Cave. 20 May 2008. html. Accessed 17/07/2008.
  7. Carver SM (2003). The Protection of Ecology on Landfill Sites. In: Land Reclamation: Extending the Boundaries — Proceedings of the 7th International Conference (Eds. H Moore, H Fox and S Elliott). AA Balkema, UK.Google Scholar
  8. CEC (1985). Soil Map of the European Communities, 1:1,000,000. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  9. Cruikshank JG (Ed.) (1997). Soil and Environment: Northern Ireland. Department of Agriculture Northern Ireland and Queens University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
  10. Dent BB (2005). Vulnerability and the unsaturated zone — the case for cemeteries. In: Proceedings “Where Waters Meet”, Joint Conference of the New Zealand Hydrological Society, International Association of Hydrogeologists Australian Chapter and New Zealand Soil Science Society, Auckland, 30 November—2 December, paper A13. Dent BB and Knight MJK (1998). Cemeteries: A special kind of landfill. The context of their sustainable management. In: Groundwater: Sustainable Solutions, pp. 451—456. International Groundwater Conference, International Association of Hydrogeologists, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  11. Drummond RD (1999). Notifiable Disease Preparedness within the State Veterinary Service. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK.Google Scholar
  12. FAO-UNESCO-ISRIC (1990). FAO-UNESCO Soil Map of the World: Revised Legend. World Soil Resources Report 60. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  13. Freedman R and Fleming R (2003). Water Quality Impacts of Burying Livestock Mortalities. Ridgetown College, Ridgetown, Ontario.Google Scholar
  14. Gray C (2001). Foot-and-Mouth Crisis: Army Digs Mass Grave to Bury 500,000. The Independent, 26 March 2001.Google Scholar
  15. Haglund W and Sorg M (1996). Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  16. Hamer G (2003). Solid waste treatment and disposal: effects on public health and environmental safety. Biotechnology Advances 22:71–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hart A (2005). Ammonia shadow of my former self. Land Contamination and Reclamation 13(3):239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heineke HJ, Eckelmann W, Thomasson AJ, Jones RJA, Montanarella L and Buckley B (Eds.) (1998). Land Information Systems: Developments for Planning the Sustainable Use of Land Resources. European Soil Bureau Research Report No. 4, EUR 17729 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  19. Home Office (2007). Planning for a Possible Influenza Pandemic: A Framework for Planners Preparing to Manage Deaths. Crime Reduction and Community Safety Group, London, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Hunter J and Cox M (2005). Forensic Archaeology: Advances in Theory and Practice. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  21. Hunter J, Roberts C and Martin A (1996). Studies in Crime: An Introduction to Forensic Archaeology. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  22. Janaway RC (1997). The decay of buried human remains and their associated materials. In: Studies in Crime: An Introduction to Forensic Archaeology (Eds. J Hunter, C Roberts and A Martin), pp. 58–85, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  23. Kim KH, Hall ML, Hart A and Pollard SJT (2008). A survey of green burial sites in England and Wales and an assessment of the feasibility of a groundwater vulnerability tool. Environmental Technology 29(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King D, Daroussin J and Tavernier R (1994). Development of a soil geographical database from the soil map of the European Communities. Catena 21:37–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knight MJ and Dent BB (1998). Sustainability of waste and groundwater management systems. In: Groundwater: Sustainable Solutions, pp. 359–374. Proceedings of the Conference of the International Association of Hydrogeologists, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  26. Lelliot M (2002). Hydrogeology, pollution and cemeteries. Teaching Earth Sciences, 27:68–73.Google Scholar
  27. Madsen HB and Jones RJA (1995). Soil profile analytical database for the European Union. Danish Journal of Geography 95:49–57.Google Scholar
  28. Mather JD (1989). The attenuation of the organic component of landfill leachate in the unsaturated zone: a review. Quarterly Journal of English Geology 22:241–6. Cited in Morgan O (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morgan O (2004). Infectious disease risks from dead bodies following natural disasters. Pan American Journal of Public Health 15(5):307–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pachecho A, Mendes J, Martins T, Hassuda S and Kimmelmann A (1991). Cemeteries: A potential risk to groundwater. Water Science and Technology: A Journal of the International Association of Water Pollution 24(11):97–104.Google Scholar
  31. Pollard SJT, Smith R, Longhurst PJ, Eduljee G and Hall D (2006). Recent developments in the application of risk analysis to waste technologies. Environment International 32:1010–1020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pollard SJT, Hickman GAW, Irving P, Hough RL, Gauntlett DM, Howson S, Hart A, Gayford P and Gent N (2008). Exposure assessment of carcass disposal options in the event of a notifiable exotic animal disease – methodology and application to avian influenza virus. Environmental Science Technology 42(9):3145–3154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Renou S, Givaudan JG, Poulain S, Dirassouyan F and Moulin P (2008). Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials 150:468–493.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Safety Officer in Physical Chemistry, University of Oxford (2005). Material Safety Data Sheet for 1,5-diaminopentane (cadaverine). Accessed 17/07/2008.
  35. Santarsiero A, Minelli L, Cutilli D and Cappiello G (2000). Hygienic aspects related to burial. Microchemical Journal 67:135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schraps W (1972). Die Bedeutung der Filtereigenschaften des Bodens fur die Anlage von Friedhofen. Mittcilungen Deutsche Bodenkundl. Gesellschaft, 16:225–259. Cited in Bouwer H (1978).Google Scholar
  37. Sigma-Aldrich (2007). Accessed 17/07/2008.
  38. Soil Survey of Scotland (1984). Soil and Land Capability for Agriculture. Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  39. Soil Survey Staff (1983). The National Soil Map of England & Wales, 1:250,000 Scale (in Six Sheets). Ordnance Survey, Southampton.Google Scholar
  40. Spongberg A and Becks P (2000a). Organic contamination in soils associated with cemeteries. Journal of Soil Contamination 9(2):87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spongberg A and Becks P (2000b). Inorganic soil contamination from cemetery leachate. Water Air and Soil Pollution117:313–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Üçisik A and Rushbrook P (1998). The Impact of Cemeteries on the Environment and Public Health: An Introductory Briefing. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Nancy Project Office.Google Scholar
  43. Velinni AA (2007). Landfill Research Trends. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge New York.Google Scholar
  44. Webb B (2005). Guide for Burial Ground Managers. Department of Constitutional Affairs, London.Google Scholar
  45. Wilson B and Robson J (2004). Cemeteries and Their Management. Research Development and Statistics Directorate, Home Office, London.Google Scholar
  46. Young CP, Blackmore KM, Reynolds P and Leavens A (1999). Pollution potential of cemeteries: Draft guidance. R&D Report, Environment Agency, Bristol.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied ScienceSecurity and Resilience, Defence Academy of the UK, Cranfield UniversityShrivenhamUK
  2. 2.Sustainable Systems DepartmentSchool of Applied Science, Cranfield UniversityCranfieldUK
  3. 3.National Soil Resources InstituteNatural Resources Department, School of Applied Sciences, Cranfield UniversityCranfieldUK

Personalised recommendations