Advertisement

Challenges and Novel Approaches in the Epidemiological Study of Early Life Influences on Later Disease

  • G. Davey Smith
  • S. Leary
  • A. Ness
  • D. A. Lawlor
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 646)

The influence of factors acting during early life on health outcomes of offspring is of considerable research and public health interest. There are, however, methodological challenges in establishing robust causal links, since exposures often act many decades before outcomes of interest, and may also be strongly related to other factors, generating considerable degrees of potential confounding. With respect to pre-natal factors, the degree of counfounding can sometimes be estimated by comparing the association between exposures experienced by the mother during pregnancy and outcomes among the offspring with the association of the same exposures experienced by the father during the pregnancy period and offspring outcomes. If the effects are due to an intra-uterine exposure, then maternal exposure during pregnancy should have a clearly greater influence than paternal exposure. If confounding by socio-economic, behavioural or genetic factors generates the association then maternal and paternal pregnancy exposures will be related in the same way with the outcome. For early life exposures it is also possible to compare outcomes in siblings who are concordant or discordant for the exposure, which will reduce the influence of family-level confounding factors. A different approach is that of Mendelian randomization, which utilises genetic variants of known effect that can proxy for modifiable exposures and are also not in general related to potential confounding factors, or influenced by disease. In other settings the use of non-genetic instrumental variables is possible. A series of examples of the application of these approaches are presented and their potentials and limitations discussed. Other epidemiological strategies are briefly reviewed. It is concluded that the naïve acceptance of findings utilising conventional epidemiological methods in this setting is misplaced.

Keywords

Causal inference developmental origins family studies Mendelian randomization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group (1994). The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers. N Engl J Med 330:1029–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beral V, Banks E, Reeves G (2002). Evidence from randomized trials of the long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy. Lancet 360:942–944.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhatti P, Sigurdson AJ, Wang SS, Chen J, Rothman N, Hartge P, Bergen AW, Landi MT (2005). Genetic variation and willingness to participate in epidemiologic research:data from three studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomar Prev 14:2449–2453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botto LD, Yang Q (2000). 5, 10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variants and congenital anomalies:a HuGE Review. Am J Epidemiol 151:862–877.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Conley D, Strully KW, Bennett NG (2003). The starting gate. Birth weight and life chances. Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Czeizel AE, Dudás I (1992). Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by pericon-ceptional vitamin supplementation. New Engl J Med 327:1832–1835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Davey Smith G (2000). Capitalising on Mendelian randomisation to assess the effects of treatment. J. Royal Soc Med 100:432–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davey Smith G (2008). Assessing intrauterine influences on offspring health outcomes:can epide-miological findings yield robust results? Basic Clini Pharmacol Toxicol 102:245–256.Google Scholar
  9. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S (2001). Epidemiology:is it time to call it a day? Int J Epidemiol 30:1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S (2003). “Mendelian randomisation”:can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol 32:1–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S (2004). Mendelian randomization:prospects, potentials, and limitations. Int J Epidemiol 33:30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S (2005) What can Mendelian randomisation tell us about modifiable behavioural and environmental exposures. BMJ; 330:1076–1079.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S (2006). Folate supplementation and cardiovascular disease. Lancet 366:1679–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davey Smith G, Leary S, Ness A (2006). Dehyration in infancy and later blood pressure. J Epidemiol Community Health 60:142–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davey Smith G, Lawlor DA, Harbord R, Timpson N, Day I, Ebrahim S (2008). Clustered environments and randomized genes:a fundamental distinction between conventional and genetic epidemiology. PloS Med 4:1985–1992.Google Scholar
  16. Der G, Batty GD, Deary IJ (2006). Effect of breast feeding on intelligence in children:prospective study, sibling pairs analysis, and meta-analysis. Brit Med J 333:945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dietary supplementation (1999). With n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E after myo-cardial infarction:results of the GISSI-Prevenzione trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto miocardico. Lancet 354:447–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fessler DM (2003). An evolutionary explanation of the plasticity of salt preferences:prophylaxis against sudden dehydration. Med Hypotheses 61:412–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2002). MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of antioxi-dant vitamin supplementation in 20536 high-risk individuals:a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 360:23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hingorani A, Humphries S (2005). Nature's randomised trials. Lancet 366:1906–1908.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaddoe VWV, Berburg BE, de Ridder MAJ, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, Steegers EAP, Witteman JCM (2007). Maternal smoking and fetal growth characteristics in different periods of pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 165:1207–1215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kivimaki M, Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G, Eklund C, Hurme M, Lehtimaki T et al. (2007). Variants in the CRP gene as a measure of life-long differences in average C-reactive protein levels:the cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study. Am J Epidemiol 166:760–764.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kramer MS, Guo T, Platt RW, Shapiro S, Collet JP, Chalmers B et al. (2002). Breastfeeding and infant growth:biology or bias? Pediatrics 110(2 Pt 1):343–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G, Bruckdorfer KR et al. (2004). Those confounded vitamins:what can we learn from the differences between observational versus randomised trial evidence? Lancet 363:1724–1727.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lawlor DA, Ebrahim S, Kundu D, Bruckdorfer KR, Whincup PH, Davey Smith G (2005a). Vitamin C is not associated with coronary heart disease risk once life course socioeconomic position is taken into account:prospective findings from the British Women's Heart and Health Study. Heart 91:1086–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawlor DA, Bor W, O'Callaghan MJ, Williams GM, Najman JM (2005b). Intrauterine growth and intelligence within sibling pairs:findings from the Mater-University study of pregnancy and its outcomes. J Epidemiol Community Health 59:279–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawlor DA, Najman JM, Batty GD, C'Callaghan MJ, Williams GM, Bor W (2006a). Early life predictors of childhood intelligence:findings from the Mater-University study of pregnancy and its outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20:148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawlor DA, Clark H, Davey Smith G, Leon DA (2006b). Childhood intelligence, educational attainment and adult body mass index:findings from a prospective cohort and within sibling-pairs analysis. Int J Obes 30:1758–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lawlor DA, Clark H, Davey Smith G, Leon DA (2006c). Intrauterine growth and intelligence within sibling-pairs:findings from the Aberdeen Children of the 1950s cohort. Pediatrics 117:e894–e902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G, Mitchell R, Ebrahim S (2006d). Adult blood pressure and climate conditions in infancy:a test of the hypothesis that dehydration in infancy increases adult blood pressure. Am J Epidemiol 163:608–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lawlor DA, Hübinette A, Tynelius P, Leon DA, Davey Smith G, Rasmussen F (2007a). The associations of gestational age and intrauterine growth with systolic blood pressure in a family based study of 386,485 men in 331,089 families. Circulation 115:562–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Sterne JAC, Timpson N, Davey Smith G (2007b). Mendelian randomization:using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat Med 27:1133–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leary S, Davey Smith G, Ness A, ALSPAC Study team (2006a). Smoking during pregnancy and components of stature in the offspring. Am J Hum Biol 18:502–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leary SD, Davey Smith G, Rogers IS, Reilly JJ, Wells JCK, Ness AR (2006b). Smoking during pregnancy and offspring fat and lean mass in childhood. Obesity 14:2284–2293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mackay DJ (2003). Model comparison and Occams Razor. In:Mackay DJ (ed.), Information theory, inference and learning algorithms. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Manson J, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Colditz G, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH (1991). A prospective study of antioxidant vitamins and incidence of coronary heart disease in women. Circulation 84(Suppl II):II-546.Google Scholar
  37. Manson JE, Hsia J, Johnson KC et al. (2003) Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease. NEJM 349:523–534.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin RM, Davey Smith G, Mangtani P, Frankel S, Gunnell D (2002). Association between breastfeeding and growth:the Boyd Orr cohort study. Arch Dis Child 87:F193–F201.Google Scholar
  39. Matte TD, Bresnahan M, Begg MD, Susser E (2001, Aug 11). Influence of variation in birth weight within normal range and within sibships on IQ at age 7 years:cohort study. BMJ 323(7308):310–314. Erratum in:BMJ 2001, Sep 22; 323(7314):684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matthews F, Yudkin P, Neil A (1999). Influence of maternal nutrition on outcome of pregnancy:prospective cohort study. BMJ 319:339–343.Google Scholar
  41. Mendel, G (1865). Experiments in plant hybridization. http://www.mendelweb.org/archive/ Mendel.Experiments.txt. Accessed May 2007.
  42. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group (1991). Prevention of neural tube defects:results of the Medical Research Council vitamin study. Lancet 338:131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Omenn GS, Goodman GE, Thornquist MD et al. (1996). Effects of a combination of beta carotene and vitamin A on lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 334:1150–1155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Osganian SK, Stampfer MJ, Rimm E, Spiegelman D, Hu FB, Manson JE, Willett WC (2003). Vitamin C and risk of coronary heart disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:246–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pembrey ME, Bygren LO, Kaati G, Edvinsson S, Northstone K, Sjöström M, Golding J, ALSPAC Study Team (2006). Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans. Eur J Hum Genet 14:159–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Poston L, Briley AL, Seed PT, Kelly FJ, Sheenan, for the Vitamins in Pre-eclampsia (VIP) Trial Consortium (2006). Vitamin C and vitamin E in pregnant women at risk for pre-eclampsia (VIP trial):randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 367:1145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Record RG, McKeown T, Edwards JH (1969). The relation of measured intelligence to birth weight and duration of gestation. Ann Hum Genet 33:71–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A, Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, Willett WC (1993). Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease in men. New Engl J Med 328:1450–1456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson SM, Crozier SR, Borland SE, Hammond J, Barker DJP, Inskip HM (2004). Impact of educational attainment on the quality of young women's diets. Eur J Clin Nutr l58:1174–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scholl TO, Johnson WG (2000). Folic acid:influence on the outcome of pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 71(Suppl):1295S–1303S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA (1991). Estrogen replacement therapy and coronary heart disease:a quantitative assessment of the epidemiologic evidence. Prev Med 20:47–63 (reprinted Int J Epidemiol 33:445–453).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett WC (1993). Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary disease in women New Engl J Med 328:1444–1449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vandenbroucke JP (2004). Commentary:the HRT story:vindication of old epidemiological theory. Int J Epidemiol 33:456–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Youngman LD, Keavney BD, Palmer A (2000). Plasma fibrinogen and fibrinogen genotypes in 4685 cases of myocardial infarction and in 6002 controls:test of causality by ‘Mendelian randomization'. Circulation 102(Suppl II):31–32.Google Scholar
  55. Youngman LD, Keavney BD, Palmer A (2000). Plasma fibrinogen and fibrinogen genotypes in 4685 cases of myocardial infarction and in 6002 controls:test of causality by ‘Mendelian randomization'. Circulation 102(Suppl II):31–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Davey Smith
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Leary
    • 3
  • A. Ness
    • 3
  • D. A. Lawlor
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Social MedicineUniversity of Bristol, Canynge HallBristol
  2. 2.MRC Centre for Causal Analyses in Translational EpidemiologyUniversity of Bristol, Canynge HallBristol
  3. 3.Department of Oral and Dental ScienceUniversity of BristolBristol

Personalised recommendations