The intuition guiding the avowed distinction between linked and convergent argument structures is easy enough to grasp – in various arguments some of the premises appear to link together to form a single reason for the conclusion, while other premises appear to constitute separate reasons which independently converge on the conclusion. Though the intuition is easy enough to grasp, as James Freeman has recently pointed out: “the problem of clearly distinguishing linked from convergent argument structure has proven vexing” (Freeman, 2001, p. 397). Indeed, the question remains whether the intuition truly captures a real distinction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bassham, G. (2003). Linked and independent premises: A new analysis. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of The Fifth Conference of the International Society for The Study of Argumentation (pp. 69–73). Amsterdam:Sic Sat.
Freeman, J. B. (2001). Argument structure and disciplinary perspective. Argumentation, 15(4), 397–423.
Goddu, G. C. (2007). Walton on argument structure. Informal Logic, 27(1), 5–25.
Goddu, G. C. (2003). Against the “Ordinary Summing” test for convergence. Informal Logic, 23(3), 215–236.
Thomas, S. N. (1986). Practical Reasoning in Natural Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Vorobej, M. (2006). A Theory of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, D. (1996). Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Yanal, R. J. (2003). Linked and convergent reasons—again. In J. A. Blair, D. Farr, H. V. Hansen, R. H. Johnson, & C. W. Tindale (Eds.), Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of the Windsor Conference [CD-ROM], Windsor, ON: OSSA.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goddu, G.C. (2009). Against Making the Linked-Convergent Distinction. In: van Eemeren, F.H., Garssen, B. (eds) Pondering on Problems of Argumentation. Argumentation Library, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9164-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9165-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)