Scholars working within the fi eld of comparative environmental policy have regularly noted the disparity in how different countries react to ecological threats. The 1986 Chernobyl accident, a catastrophe that spread measurable amounts of radioactivity across a broad stretch of northern Europe, provides a particularly poignant illustration of the ways in which predominant public responses to environmental risk can vary. During the months following the incident, a number of commentators quipped that the ill-effects of atmospheric dispersal oddly seemed to stop at the German-French border. These remarks were motivated by the sardonic observation that while Germans typically refused to eat locally-grown vegetables during the months following the incident, their French neighbours evidenced no similar vigilance.
On a broader scale, we have witnessed over the past decade cross-national variation in the form of Dutch environmental advocates cooperating with industry in a way hardly imaginable in Germany, British eco-warriors burrowing themselves into underground bunkers to obstruct the construction of new roads, and American communities aggressively protesting the construction of hazardous waste incinerators. These multifarious forms of agitation around environmental concerns invariably lead to very different political responses and policy outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in fi ve nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Andersen, M. (1994). Governance by green taxes: Making pollution prevention pay. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Andersen, M., & Liefferink, D. (1997). European environmental policy: The pioneers. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Archambault, S. (2004). Ecological modernization of the agriculture industry in southern Sweden: Reducing emissions to the Baltic Sea. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 491–503.
Banfield, E. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. New York: Free Press.
Bate, J. (1991). Romantic ecology: Wordsworth and the environmental tradition. London: Routledge.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Bickerstaff, K., & Walker, G. (2001). Public understandings of air pollution: The ‘localisation’ of environmental risk. Global Environmental Change, 11, 133–145.
Boehmer-Christiansen, S., & Skea, J. (1993). Acid politics: Energy and environmental policies in Britain and Germany. London: Belhaven Press.
Boehmer-Christiansen, S., & Weidner, H. (1995). The regulation of vehicle emissions in Britain and Germany: The catalytic conversion. London: Pinter.
Breukers, S., & Wolsink, M. (2007). Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. Energy Policy, 33, 2737–2750.
Burgess, J., Harrison, C., & Filius, P. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A, 39(8), 1445–1460.
Catton, W., & Dunlap, R. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24(1), 14–47.
Christiansen, P. (Ed.). (1996). Governing the environment: Politics, policy, and organization in the Nordic countries. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
Cohen, M. (1996). Risk society and ecological modernisation: Alternative visions for post-industrial nations. Futures, 29(2), 105–119.
Cohen, M. (1998). Science and the environment: Assessing cultural capacity for ecological modernization. Public Understanding of Science, 7(2), 149–167.
Cohen, M. (1999). Science and society in historical perspective: Implications for social theories of risk. Environmental Values, 8(2), 153–176.
Cohen, M. (2000a). Ecological modernisation, environmental knowledge, and national character: A preliminary analysis of the Netherlands. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 77–105.
Cohen, M. (Ed.). (2000b). Risk in the modern age: Social theory, science, and environmental decision-making. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
Cohen, M. (2006). Ecological modernization and its discontents: The American environmental movement's resistance to an innovation-driven future. Futures, 38, 528–547.
Dake, K. (1992). Myths of Nature: Culture and the social construction of risk. Journal of Social Issues, 48(1), 21–37.
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dunlap, R., Gallup, G., & Gallup, A. (1993). Health of the planet. Princeton, NJ: Gallup International Institute.
Durant, J., Evans, G., & Thomas, G. (1989). The public understanding of science. Nature, 340(6), 11–14.
Eden, S. (1996). Public participation in environmental policy: Considering scientifi c, counter-scientifi c, and non-scientifi c contributions. Public Understanding of Science, 5(3), 183–204.
Eden, S. (1998). Environmental issues: Knowledge, uncertainty, and the environment. Progress in Human Geography, 22(3), 425–432.
Elzen, B., Geels, F., & Green, K. (Eds.). (2005). System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence, and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Enloe, C. (1975). The politics of pollution in comparative perspective: Ecology and power in four nations. New York: David McKay.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Glacken, C. (1967). Traces on the rhodian shore: Nature and culture in western thought from ancient times to the nd of the eighteenth century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gouldson, A., & Murphy, J. (1998). Regulatory realities: The implementation and impact of industrial environmental regulation. London: Earthscan.
Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Halfmann, J. (1999). Community and life chances: Risk movements in the United States and Germany. Environmental Values, 8(2), 177–197.
Hannigan, J. (1995). Environmental sociology: A social con-structivist perspective. London: Routledge.
Harrington, A. (1996). Re-enchanted science: Holism in German culture from Wilhelm II to Hitler. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Harrison, C., Burgess, J., & Filius, P. (1996). Rationalizing environmental responsibilities: A comparison of lay publics in the UK and the Netherlands. Global Environmental Change, 6(3), 215–234.
Harrison, C. M., & Burgess, J. (1994). Social constructions of nature: A case study of confl icts over the development of Rainham Marshes. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 19(3), 291–310.
Hoffman, L. (1992). American psychologists and wartime research on Germany 1941–45. American Psychologist, 47(2), 264–273.
Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the making of a new world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political style. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. Political Science and Politics, 28(1), 57–72.
Inkeles, A. (1997). National character: A psycho-social perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise, and sustainable development. London: Routledge.
Irwin, A. (1997). Risk, the environment, and environmental knowledge. In M. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 218–226). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (Eds.). (1996). Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jacob, M. (1997). Scientifi c culture and the making of industrial west. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jamison, A. (Ed.). (1998). Technology policy meets the public, pesto papers 2. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
Jamison, A., & Baark, E. (1999). National shades of green: Comparing the Swedish and Danish styles in ecological modernization. Environmental Values, 8(2), 199–218.
Jamison, A., & Østby, P. (Eds.). (1997). Public participation and sustainable development: Comparing European experiences, pesto papers 2. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
Jänicke, M., & Weidner, H. (1997). National environmental policies: A comparative study of capacity building. Berlin: Springer.
Jasanoff, S. (1986). Risk management and political culture: A comparative study of science in the policy context. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fi fth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, S., & Wynne, B. (1998). Science and decision-making. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change (pp. 1–87). Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
Johnson, B., & Covello, V. (1987). The social and cultural construction of risk. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Joppke, C. (1993). The social struggle over nuclear energy: A comparison of West Germany and the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., & Hartley, J. A. (1995). Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lafferty, W. (1996). The politics of sustainable development: Global norms for national implementation. Environmental Politics, 5(2): 185–208.
Lafferty, W., & Meadowcroft, J. (Eds.). (2001). Implementing sustainable development: Strategies and initiatives in high consumption societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lipset, S. (1996). American exceptionalism: A doubled-edged sword. New York: W.W. Norton.
Lundqvist, L. (1980). The hare and the tortoise: Clean air policies in the United States and Sweden. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Lundqvist, L. (2000). Capacity building or social construction? Explaining Sweden's shift towards ecological modernisation. Geoforum, 31, 21–32.
Lundvall, B.-Ã…. (1992). National systems of innovation: A comparative analysis. London: Pinter.
Mertig, A., & Dunlap, R. (1995). Public approval of environmental protection and other new social movement goals in Western Europe and the United States. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 72(2), 145–156.
Michael, M. (1991). Discourses of danger and dangerous discourses: Patrolling the borders of science, nature, and society. Discourse and Society, 2(1), 5–28.
Miller, J. (1996). Public understanding of science and technology in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Symposium on Public Understanding of Science and Technology, Tokyo, 5–6 November.
Mol, A. (1995). The refi nement of production: Ecological modernization theory and the chemical industry. Doctoral thesis, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Nash, R. (1967). Wilderness and American mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Nelkin, D., & Pollak, M. (1981). The atom besieged: Extraparliamentary dissent in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
OECD. (1996). Environmental performance in OECD countries: Progress in the 1990s. Paris: OECD.
Porter, M., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–133.
Porter, R., & Teich, M. (Eds.). (1988). Romanticism in national context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Procter, J. (2006). Religion as trust in authority: Theocracy and ecology in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 188–196.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Reveil, A. (2007). The ecological modernisation of SMEs in the UK's construction industry. Geoforum, 38, 114–126.
Rupke, N. (1988). Romanticism in the Netherlands. In R. Porter & M. Teich (Eds.), Romanticism in national context (pp. 191–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidheiny, S. (1992). Changing course: A global business perspective on development and the environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schooler, C. (1996). Cultural and social-structural explanations of cross-national psychological differences. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 323–349.
Taylor, P., & Buttel, F. (1992). How do we know we have global environmental problems? Science and the globalization of environmental discourse. Geoforum, 23(3), 405–416.
Teich, M., Porter, R., & Gustafsson, B. (Eds.). (1997). Nature and society in historical context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, K. (1983). Man and the natural world: Changing attitudes in England 1500–1800. London: Allen Lane.
Tucker, M., Whaley, S., Sharp, J. (2006). Consumer perceptions of food related risks. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 41, 135–146.
Vig, N., & Faure, M. (Eds.). (2004). Green giants: Environmental policies in the United States and the European Union. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vogel, D. (1986). National styles of regulation: Environmental policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Weale, A. (1992). The new politics of pollution. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Weizsäcker, E., Lovins, A., & Lovins, H. (1997). Factor four: Doubling wealth, halving resource use. London: Earthscan.
Wintle, M., & Reeve, R. (Eds.). (1994). Rhetoric and reality in environmental policy: The case of the Netherlands in comparison with Britain. Aldershot, Hants: Avebury.
Wynne, B. (1993). Implementation of greenhouse gas reductions in the European community: Institutional and cultural factors. Global Environmental Change, 3(1):101–128.
Wynne, B. (1994). Scientifi c knowledge and the global environment. In M. Redclift & T. Benton (Eds.), Social theory and the global environment (pp. 169–189). London: Routledge.
Wynne, B. (1996). May the sheep graze safely: A refl exive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment, and modernity: Towards a new ecology (pp. 44–83). London: Sage.
Yearley, S. (1991). The green case: A sociology of environmental issues, arguments, and politics. London: Harper Collins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cohen, M.J. (2009). Environmental Policies in Their Cultural and Historical Contexts. In: Boersema, J.J., Reijnders, L. (eds) Principles of Environmental Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9158-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9158-2_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9157-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9158-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)