Impact of Feedwater Salinity on Energy Requirements of a Small-Scale Membrane Filtration System
Many remote communities in both developed and developing countries lack electricity and clean drinking water. One solution, for such communities that rely on brackish groundwater, is a photovoltaic (PV) powered hybrid ultrafiltration (UF)/nanofiltration (NF) or reverse osmosis (RO) membrane filtration system. The system prototype described here can produce between 150–280 L of clean water for each peak sunshine hour, depending on the salinity of the feedwater (1–5 g/L of total dissolved solids (TDS) ) and membrane choice. The best specific energy consumption (SEC) for achieving drinking water quality with a salinity of less than 0.5 g/L TDS from 1, 2.5 and 5 g/L salinity feedwater was 1.1, 1.8 and 2.6 kWh/m3, respectively. Slightly higher feedwaters (7.5 g/L) can be treated with one of the membranes tested, and as long as sufficient power is available for providing an adequate transmembrane pressure. Higher salinities cannot be treated effectively with the current system due to pressure limitations. Energy recovery would need to be investigated in order to achieve a competitive SEC for such high salinity feedwaters.
KeywordsPhotovoltaic solar energy desalination membranes nanofiltration and reverse osmosis submerged ultrafiltration pretreatment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Zenon Environmental (Canada), Dow Chemicals (Australia) and Koch Membrane Systems (USA) are thanked for the provision of membrane modules and/or technical support. Funding for this project is provided through the Australian Research Council Linkage Projects scheme (LP0349322). The authors would like to thank Andrew Moore from Mono Pumps (Australia) for useful discussions and project support.
- Alajlan, S.A., Smiai, M.S., 1996. Performance and development of PV-plant for water pumping and desalination for remote areas in Saudi Arabia. In: Proc. of World Renewable Energy Congress IV, Denver, Colorado, USA, pp. 441–446.Google Scholar
- Block, D.L., Melody, I.I., 1989. Assessment of solar desalination processes. In: Proc. of Solar‘89, American Solar Energy Society, Denver, USA, pp. 62–71.Google Scholar
- Crutcher, J.L., Norbedo, A.J., Cummings, A.B., 1982. Photovoltaic powered seawater desalination systems: Experience with two installations. In: Proc. of 16th IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conference, San Diego, CA, pp. 1400–1404.Google Scholar
- Dow Filmtec Membranes, 2007a. BW30 technical information. URL: http://www.dow.com/ PublishedLiterature/dh_058e/09002f138058eb00.pdf (last accessed 28 Feb 2007).
- Dow Filmtec Membranes, 2007b. NF90 technical information. URL: http://www.dow.com/ PublishedLiterature/dh_0603/09002f13806035f5.pdf (last accessed 28 Feb 2007).
- Koch Membrane Systems, 2007. TFC-S technical information. URL: http://www.kochmembrane. com/pdf/8492000spiral.pdf (last accessed 28 Feb 2007).
- Mathew, K., Dallas, S., Ho, G.E., Anda, M., 2000. A solar-powered village water supply system from brackish water. In: Proc. of World Renewable Energy Congress VI, Brighton, UK. pp. 2061–2064.Google Scholar
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), 2004. Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, National Health and Medical Research Council, National Water Quality Management Strategy.Google Scholar
- Parodi, O., Preiser, K., Schweizer-Ries, P., 2000. Clean water with clean energy: A huge market for PV — but not yet explored. In: Proc. of 16th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, pp. 2997–3001.Google Scholar
- United Nations Development (UNDP) Report, 1998. Human Development Report, Goetzky, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
- Vrba, J., Verhagen, B.T., 2006. Groundwater for emergency situations — a framework document. International Hydrological Programme VI, Series on Groundwater No. 12, UNESCO, Paris, URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001427/142762e.pdf.