Advertisement

Subsonic Tests of a Flush Air Data Sensing System Applied to a Fixed-Wing Micro Air Vehicle

Chapter

Abstract

Flush air data sensing (FADS) systems have been successfully tested on the nose tip of large manned/unmanned air vehicles. In this paper we investigate the application of a FADS system on the wing leading edge of a micro (unmanned) air vehicle (MAV) flown at speed as low as Mach 0.07. The motivation behind this project is driven by the need to find alternative solutions to air data booms which are physically impractical for MAVs. Overall an 80% and 97% decrease in instrumentation weight and cost respectively were achieved. Air data modelling is implemented via a radial basis function (RBF) neural network (NN) trained with the extended minimum resource allocating network (EMRAN) algorithm. Wind tunnel data were used to train and test the NN, where estimation accuracies of 0.51°, 0.44 lb/ft2 and 0.62 m/s were achieved for angle of attack, static pressure and wind speed respectively. Sensor faults were investigated and it was found that the use of an autoassociative NN to reproduce input data improved the NN robustness to single and multiple sensor faults. Additionally a simple NN domain of validity test demonstrated how the careful selection of the NN training data set is crucial for accurate estimations.

Keywords

Micro (unmanned) air vehicle Flush air data sensing systems Extended minimum resource allocating neural networks Fault accommodation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen, D., Haley, D.: NASA tests new laser air data system on SR-71 Blackbird. NASA. http://www.nasa-usa.de/home/hqnews/1993/93-163.txt (1993). Accessed 17 September 1993
  2. 2.
    Cary, J.P., Keener, E.R.: Flight evaluation of the X-15 Ball-Nose Flow-Direction sensor as a airdata System. NASA TN D-2923 (1965)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wolowicz, C.H., Gosett, T.D.: Operational and performance characteristics of the X-15 spherical hypersonic flow direction sensor. NASA TN D-3076 (1965)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larson, T.J., Siemers III, P.M.: Subsonic tests of an All-Flush-Pressure-Orifice air data system. NASA TP 1871 (1981)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Larson, T.J., Whitmore, S.A., Ehernberger, L.J., Johnson, J.B., Siemers III, P.M.: Qualitative evaluation of a flush air data system at transonic speeds and high angles of attack. NASA TP-2716 (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larson, T.J., Moes, T.R., Siemers III, P.M.: Wind tunnel investigation of a flush airdata system at Mach numbers from 0.7 to 1.4. NASA TM-101697 (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Whitmore, S.A., Davis R.J., Fife J.M.: In flight demonstration of a real time flush airdata sensing system. NASA TM 104314 (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rohloff, T.: Development and evaluation of neural network flush air data sensing systems. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of California (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crowther, W.J., Lamont, P.J.: A neural network approach to the calibration of a flush air data system. Aeronaut. J. 105, 85–95 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown, E.N., Friehe, C.A., Lenschow, D.H.: The use of pressure fluctuations on the nose of an aircraft for measuring air motion. J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 22, 171–180 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wenger, C., Devenport, W.: Seven-hole pressure probe calibration method utilizing look-up error tables. AIAA J. 37, 675–679 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rediniotis, O., Vijayagopal, R.: Miniature multihole pressure probes and their neural network based calibration. AIAA J. 37, 666–674 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rediniotis, O., Chrysanthakopoulos, G.: Application of neural networks and fuzzy logic to the calibration of the seven-hole probe. J. Fluid. Eng.—Trans. ASME 120, 95–101 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lu, Y., Sundararajan, N., Saratchandran, P.: Analysis of minimal radial basis function network algorithm for real-time identification of nonlinear dynamic systems. IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl. 4, 476–484 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Houghton, E.L., Carpenter, P.W.: Aerodynamics for Engineering Students. Butterworth Heinemann, Burlington, MA (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gallinari, F.: Industrial Applications of Neural Networks. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Great Britain (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haykin, S.: Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Macmillan College Publishing Company, New York (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Powell, M.J.D.: Radial basis function for multivariable interpolation: a review. In: Mason, J.C., Cox, M.G. (eds.) Algorithms for Approximation, pp. 143–167. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1987)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen, S., Cowan, F.N., Grant, P.M.: Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2, 302–309 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Platt, J.C.: A resource allocating network for function interpolation. Neural Comput. 3, 213–225 (1991)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kadirkamanathan, V., Niranjan, M.: A function estimation approach to sequential learning with neural networks. Neural Comput. 5, 954–975 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fravolini, M.L., Campa, G., Napolitano, M., Song, Y.: Minimal resource allocating networks for aircraft SFDIA. Adv. Intell. Mechatron. 2, 1251–1256 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Courrieu, P.: Three algorithms for estimating the domain of validity of feedforward neural networks. Neural Netw. 7, 169–174 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Helliwell, I.S., Torega M.A., Cottis, R.A.: Accountability of neural networks trained with ‘Real World’ data. In: Artificial Neural Networks, Conference Publication No. 409 IEE, pp. 218–222. 26–28 June (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    FAA: Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Certifications and Authorizations. US Dept. of Transportation. http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/design_approvals/uas/cert/ (2007). Accessed 5 November 2007
  26. 26.
    mini vane. SpaceAge Control. http://www.spaceagecontrol.com/pm/uploads/Main.Adpmain/100386.pdf (2008). Accessed 13 February 2008

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EngineeringUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations