Advertisement

Balancing Necessity and Fallibilism: Charles Sanders Peirce on the Status of Mathematics and its Intersection with the Inquiry into Nature

  • Ronald Anderson
Part of the The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science book series (WONS, volume 73)

An interest in Charles Sanders Peirce and pragmatist thought in general emerged in the United States in the middle of last century to exert a powerful influence on a generation of American philosophers educated in the 1940s and 1950s, including Abner Shimony, whose thought is the occasion for this paper. Those threads in Peirce's work related to developing a scientifically informed worldview and metaphysics were the natural influences on Abner and this paper will begin by briefly reviewing a number of these threads and their influences in his writings. This sets the scene for the main project of the paper, an earlier historical project on a related aspect of Peirce's thought—his understanding of mathematics and its place in the description of nature. Mathematics was a foundational discipline for Peirce, one with qualities of necessity and certainty, features that stand in interesting contrast and tension to Peirce's view of an evolving nature which is governed by chance and our knowledge of which is always fallible and thus open to revision. Exploring these issues reveals deep background beliefs structuring Peirce's thought. The paper concludes in the contemporary realm with the speculation that due to the scientific developments of the 20th century, aspects of Peirce's work that formed a vision for a scientific metaphysics for earlier generations may be less relevant now. Nevertheless, the naturalistic spirit and orientation of Peirce's work remains compelling and productive.

Keywords

Natural Science Pure Mathematics Mathematical Reasoning Mathematical Truth Hypothetical State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Peirce, Charles S. (1992). Reasoning and the logic of things: the Cambridge conferences lectures of 1898. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Edited by Kenneth Laine Ketner; with an introduction by Kenneth Laine Ketner and Hilary Putnam.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haack, Susan (1996). “Between Scientism and Conversationalism.” Philosophy and Literature 20(2): 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchler (1939), Justus (1939). Charles Peirce's Empiricism. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nagel, Ernest (1940). “Charles S. Peirce, Pioneer of Modern Empiricism.” Philosophy of Science 7: 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kloppenberg, James T. (1996). “Pragmatism: An Old Name for Some New Ways of Thinking?” Journal of American History 83: 100–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rockmore, T. (2004). “On the Structure of Twentieth-Century Philosophy.” Metaphilosophy 35: 466–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernstein, Richard J. (1992). “The Resurgence of Pragmatism.” Social Research 59: 813–840.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brent, Joseph (1993). Charles Sanders Peirce: a life. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peirce, Charles S. (1992). The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings, Vol. 1. Bloom-ington, IN, Indiana University Press. Edited with an introduction by Nathan Houser and Christian J. W. Kloesel.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peirce, Charles S. (1998). The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings, Vol. 2. Bloom-ington, IN, Indiana University Press. Edited by the Peirce Edition Project; with an introduction by Nathan Houser.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goudge, Thomas A. (1950). The thought of C. S. Peirce. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murphey, Murray G. (1961). The development of Peirce's philosophy. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hookway, Christopher (1985). Pe i rc e. London/Boston, Routledge &Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Houser, Nathan, Don D. Roberts, and James Van Evra (1997) (eds.). Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peirce, Charles S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1–8 Cambridge. Originally published: Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press. Edited by Paul Weiss and Charles Hartshorne and A. W. Burk.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peirce, Charles S. (1982). Writings of Charles S. Peirce: a chronological edition. Blooming-ton, IN, Indiana University Press. Edited by Max Harold Fisch and Christian J. W. Kloesel.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gross, Neil (2003). “Richard Rorty's Pragmatism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Ideas.” Theory & Society 32: 93–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shimony, Abner (1993). Search for a naturalistic world view. 2 volumes, Cambridge [England]/New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shimony, Abner (2002). Transcript of oral history interview of Abner Shimony by Joan Bromberg, September 9 and 10, 2002. Niels Bohr Library, American Institute of Physics, 147 pp.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haack, Susan (2005). “Formal Philosophy? A Plea for Pluralism” in Vincent F. Hendricks and John Symons, eds., Formal Philosophy, Automatic Press, pp. 77–98.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bernstein, Richard J. (2006). “Pragmatic Reflections on Tolerance.” Available online at http://www.pucp.edu.pe/eventos/congresos/filosofia/programageneral/lunes/plenaria/BernsteinRichard.pdf
  22. 22.
    Rockmore, T. (2005). “On Classical and Neo-Analytic Forms of Pragmatism.” Metaphiloso-phy 36: 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shimony, Abner (1999). “Can the Fundamental Laws of Nature Be the Result of Evolution?” in C. Pagonis and J. Butterfield, eds., From physics to philosophy. Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–223.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davies, Paul (2007). “The Universe's Weird Bio-Friendliness.” The Chronicle of Higher Education 53(31): B14.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Skrbina, David (2005). Panpsychism in the West. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shimony, Abner (2002). “Some Intellectual Obligations of Epistemological Naturalism” in D. B. Malement, ed., Reading natural philosophy: essays in the history and philosophy of science and mathematics. Chicago, IL, Open Court, pp. 297–313.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peirce, Charles S. (1979). The new elements of mathematics. 4 volumes. The Hague, Mouton/ Humanities Press. Edited by Carol Eisele.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eisele, Carolyn (1979). Studies in the scientific and mathematical philosophy of Charles S. Peirce: essays by Carolyn Eisele. The Hague/New York, Mouton. Edited by R. M. Martin.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Joswick, Hugh (1988). “Peirce's Mathematical Model of Interpretation.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 24: 107–121.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Levy, Stephen H. (1997). “Peirce's Theoremic/Corollarial Distinction and the Interconnections between Mathematics and Logic“ in N. Houser, D. D. Roberts, and J. Van Evra, eds., Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press, pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cooke, Elizabeth F. (2003). “Peirce, Fallibilism, and the Science of Mathematics.” Philosophia Mathematica 11: 158–175.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Campos, Daniel (2007). “Peirce on the Role of Poetic Creation in Mathematical Reasoning.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43: 470–489.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eisele, Carolyn (1971). “The mathematical foundations of Peirce's Philosophy” in Studies in the scientific and mathematical philosophy of Charles S. Peirce: essays by Carolyn Eisele. The Hague/New York, Mouton. Edited by R. M. Martin.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hull, Kathleen (1994). “Why Hanker after Logic? Mathematical Imagination, Creativity, and Perception in Peirce's Systematic Philosophy.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30: 271–296.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dipert, Randall R. (1994). “Peirce's Underestimated Place in the History of Logic: A Response to Quine,” in Kenneth L. Ketner, ed., Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries, New York: Fordham University Press, 32–58.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Whately, Richard (1826). Elements of logic: comprising the substance of the article in the Encyclopedia Metropolitana; with additions, &c. London, J. Mawman.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peirce, Charles S. and Victoria Welby (2001). Semiotic and significs: the correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Elsah, IL, Arisbe Associates. Edited by Charles S. Harwick and James Cook.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Peirce (1870) Peirce, Benjamin (1881). “Linear Associative Algebra.” American Journal of Mathematics 4: 97–229. This paper is based on a memoir read before the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, 1870. It was published posthumously with notes by Charles S. Peirce.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Seibert, Charles H. (2005). “Charles Peirce's Reading of Richard Whately's ‘Elements of Logic’.” History and Philosophy of Logic 26: 1–31.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Boole, George (1847). The mathematical analysis of logic: being an essay towards a calculus of deductive reasoning. Cambridge, England, Macmillan Barclay & Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Babbage, Charles and John Herschel (1813). “Preface.” Memoirs of the Analytical Society: i–xxii.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chrystal, George (1883). “Mathematics”. The ninth edition, Encyclopaedia Britannica. Vol. 15. Edinburgh, Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Peirce, Benjamin (1881). Ideality in the physical sciences. Boston, FL, Little Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Peirce, Benjamin (1880). “The impossible in mathematics”, in Mrs. John T. Sargent, ed., Sketches and reminiscences of the Radical Club of Chestnut St. Boston. Boston, FL, James R. Osgood, pp. 376–379.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sylvester, James J. (1868). “Presidential Address to the British Association.” reproduced in Sylvester's mathematical papers, vol. 2, p. 654.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Locke, John (1690). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Anderson, Ronald and Girish Joshi (1993). “Quaternions and the Heuristic Role of Mathematical Structures in Physics.” Physics Essays 6: 308–319.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Anderson, Ronald and Girish Joshi (2008), “Interpreting Mathematics in Physics: Charting the Applications of SU(2) in 20th Century Physics.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 36: 397–404.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Herschel, John F. W. 1831. Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gray, Jeremy J. (2004). “Anxiety and Abstraction in Nineteenth-Century Mathematics.” Science in Context 17: 23–47.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Peirce, Charles S. (1975). Charles Sanders Peirce: contributions to the nation. Lubbock, TX, Texas Tech Press. Compiled and annotated by Kenneth Laine Ketner and James Edward Cook.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Haack, Susan (1979). “Fallibilism and Necessity.” Synthese 41: 37–63.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bernstein, Richard J. (1989). “Pragmatism, Pluralism and the Healing of Wounds.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 63: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mancosu, Paolo (1997). From Brouwer to Hilbert: the debate on the foundations of mathematics in the 1920s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Giaquinto, M. (2002). The search for certainty: a philosophical account of foundations of mathematics. Oxford/New York, Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Thagard, Paul and Beam, Craig (2004). “Epistemological Metaphors and the Nature of Philosophy.” Metaphilosophy 35: 504–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Abrams, Jerold J. (2002). “Philosophy After the Mirror of Nature: Rorty, Dewey, and Peirce on Pragmatism and Metaphor.” Metaphor and Symbol 3: 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Steward, Dugald (1854–1860). The collected works of Dugald Stewart. Edited by Sir W. Hamilton: 11 vols., Edinburgh, T. Constable: Vols. 2–4, Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind, vol. II first published 1814.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chihara, Charles S. (2004). A structural account of mathematics. Oxford/New York, Clarendon/Oxford University Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bourbaki, Nicolas (1994). Elements of the history of mathematics. Berlin/New York, Springer-Ve r l ag.MATHGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cooke, Elizabeth F. (2007). “Peirce's General Theory of Inquiry and the Problem of Mathematics” (under review).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Whitehead, Alfred N. (1926). Science and the modern world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Dewey, John (1938), The later works, 1925–1953, Volume 12, Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL, Southern Illinois University Press, Edited by Jo Ann Boydston.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Campos, Daniel G. (2005). The Discovery of Mathematical Probability Theory: A Case Study in the Logic of Mathematical Inquiry. Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, UMI AAT 3202479.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hacking, Ian (1983). Representing and intervening: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Peirce, Benjamin (1855). A system of analytic mechanics. Boston, FL, Little Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Walsh, Alison (2000). Relationships Between Logic and Mathematics in the Works of Benjamin and Charles S. Peirce, Ph.D. thesis, Middlesex University.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Peirce, Benjamin (1853). Address of Professor Benjamin Peirce, president of the American Association for the year 1853, on retiring from the duties of president.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Emerson, Edward Waldo (1918). The early years of the Saturday club, 1855–1870. Boston, FL/New York, Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Goodman, Nicolas (1991). “Modernizing the Philosophy of Mathematics.” Synthese 88: 119–126.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    van Kerkhove, Bart (2006). “Mathematical Naturalism: Origins, Guises and Prospects.” Foundations of Science 11: 5–39.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Searle, John R. (2006). “Minding the Brain, Review of ‘Seeing Red: A Study in Consciousness’ by Nicholas Humphrey.” The New York Review of Books 53.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Popper, Karl R. (1957). “The Propensity Interpretation of the Calculus of Probability, and the Quantum Theory,” in S. Körner, ed., Observation and Interpretation. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications, pp. 65–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald Anderson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBoston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations