Water Loss and Gene Expression of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plants Under Dehydration

  • T. -R. Kwon
  • J. -O. Lee
  • S. -K. Lee
  • S. -C. Park
Part of the Tasks for Vegetation Sciences book series (TAVS, volume 44)


This study aims to determine physiological and molecular alterations as exposed to dehydration stress in rice plant. Rice seedlings were grown in a nutrient solution within a managed environment chamber prior to the imposition of the dehydration stress. Dehydration was imposed through uprooting and exposing to controlled environment condition (25°C, RH 50%, and 290 PAR). Water loss of intact plant was determined by continuous weightings with every minute interval till 300 minutes after starting the imposition of dehydration. The imposition of dehydration caused signifi cant loss of internal water, resulting in 44% out of initial water content at 300 minutes-long dehydration. The dehydration imposition also reduced the rate of water loss per minute per gram dry weight from 14.2 to 2.1 mg min−1 g dry weight−1. These results indicate that the dehydration imposition could causes osmotic stress due to water loss in tissue. The dehydration stress also reduced signifi cantly relative water content and osmotic potentials over the time. The dehydration stress induced the mRNA expression of drought-induced protein (Dip1), drought-induced hydrophobic protein (DRR2) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). MAPKs were mostly expressed before 20% water loss out of the initial water content. However, Dip1 and DRR2 were strongly expressed after 20–40 water loss out of the initial water content. These results indicate that the physiological parameters such as water loss rate and water status can be used a physiological scale, especially to explore the genes related to simple response and/or tolerance against internal water deficit.


Dehydration gene expression osmotic stress rice water loss 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atlin GN, Lafi tte R, Venuprasad R, Kumar R, Jongdee B (2004) Heritability of rice yield under reproductive-stage drought stress, correlations across stress levels and effects of selection: Implications for drought tolerance breeding. CIMMYT/Drought/Rockefeller Foundation Workshop 2004, pp 85–87.Google Scholar
  2. Bray EA (1997) Plant responses to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci 2: 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabuslay GS, Ito O, Alejar AA (2002) Physiological evaluation of responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to water deficit. Plant Sci 163: 815–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell JL, Klueva NY, Zheng HG, Nieto-Sotelo J, Ho T-HD, Nguyen HT (2001) Cloning of new members of heat shock protein HSP101 gene family in wheat (Triticum aestivum (L.) Moench) inducible by heat, dehydration and ABA. Biochimic Biophys Acta 1517: 270–277.Google Scholar
  5. Chen BJ, Wang Y, Hu YL, Wu Q, Lin JP (2005) Cloning and characterization of a drought-inducible MYB gene from Boea crassifolia. Plant Sci 168: 493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dingkuhn M, Audebert AY, Jones MP, Etienne K, Sow A (1999) Control of stomatal conductance and leaf rolling in O. sativa and O. glaberrima upland rice. Field Crop Res 61: 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garrity DP, O' Toole JC (1994) Screening rice for drought resis tance at the reproductive phase. Field Crop Res 39: 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoekstra FA, Golovinia EA, Buitink J (2001) Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 6: 1360–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang, B, Jin L, Liu JY (2008) Identifi cation and characterization of the novel gene GhDBP2 encoding a DRE-binding protein from cotton (Gossypium hirstum). J Plant Physiol 165:214–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jongdee B, Fukai S, Cooper M (2002) Leaf water potential and osmotic adjustment as physiological traits to improve drought tolerance in rice. Field Crops Res 76: 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kato Y, Kamoshita A, Abe J, Yamagishi J (2007) Improvement of rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth in upland conditions with deep tillage and mulch. Soil Till Res 92: 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knetsch MLW, Wang M, Snaar-Jagalska BE, Heimovaara-Dijkstra S (1996) Abscisic acid induces mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in barley aleurone protoplasts. Plant Cell 8: 1061–1067.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liang YH, Sun WQ (2002) Rate of dehydration and cumulative desiccation stress interacted to modulate desiccation tolerance of recalcitrant cocoa and ginkgo embryonic tissues. Plant Physiol 128: 1323–1331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mizoguchi T, Irie K, Hirayama T, Hayashida N, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Matsumoto K, Shinozaki K (1996) A gene encoding a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase is induced simultaneously with genes for a mitogen-activated protein kinase and an S6 ribosomal protein kinase by touch, cold, and water stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. PNAS 93: 765–769.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ouk M, Basnayake J, Tsubo M, Fukai S, Fisher KS, Cooper M, Nesbitt H (2006) Use of drought response index for identification of drought tolerant genotypes in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crop Res 99: 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rodriguez M, Canales E, Borroto CJ, Carmona E, Lopez J, Pujol M, Borras-Hidalgo O (2006) Identifi cation of genes induced upon water-deficit stress in a drought-tolerant rice cultivar. J Plant Physiol 163: 577–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sambrook J, Fritsh EF, Maniatis T (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Sharp RE and Le Noble ME (2002) ABA, ethylene and the control of shoot and root growth under water stress. J Exp Bot 53: 33–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shinozaki K, Yamagichi-Shinozaki K, Seki M (2003) Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 410–417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Turner NC, O' Toole JC, Cruz RZ, Yambao EB, Ahmad S, Namuco OS, Dingkuhn M (1986) Responses of seven diverse rice cultivars to water deficits. II. Osmotic adjustment, leaf elasticity, leaf extension, leaf death, stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Field Crop Res 13: 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu JH, Zhu JK (2006) Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J 45: 523–539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. -R. Kwon
    • 1
  • J. -O. Lee
    • 1
  • S. -K. Lee
    • 1
  • S. -C. Park
    • 1
  1. 1.The National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology/RDASuwonKorea

Personalised recommendations