Advertisement

A Reappraisal of the Relationship between Sea Level and Species Richness

  • Peter J. Harries
Part of the Topics in Geobiology book series (TGBI, volume 21)

The relationship between area and species richness was documented as early as the mid-17th century (see discussion in Rosenzweig, 1995), but it was not until the publication of MacArthur and Wilson’s (1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography that the hypothesis became ingrained in ecological theory. Their work forcefully presented substantial empirical evidence that explained the nature of, and possibly the controls of, diversity, at least on oceanic islands. Their hypothesis that species-level diversity is dependent upon area raised the hopes of paleontologists that this relationship could readily be applied to the fossil record of marine organisms and hence to the history of life. The paleontologic application of this concept was founded on the belief that the species-area relationship should hold for benthic marine organisms responding to changes in shelf areas primarily affected by sealevel fluctuations. Therefore, diversity increases and declines chronicled in the fossil record would largely represent transgressions and regressions, respectively, as far as benthic organisms are concerned. These patterns are overprinted by plate tectonic, evolutionary, and mass-extinction events, but nevertheless sea-level changes should be a dominant control.

A number of early studies pointed to the potential applicability of the species-area effect for various intervals of geologic time (e.g., Johnson, 1974; Schopf, 1974; Simberloff, 1974). In addition, building on earlier work by Newell (1967), there were attempts to relate Phanerozoic compilations of species-level diversity, such as that by Raup (1976a), to sea-level fluctuations (e.g., (Sepkoski, 1976); but see reinterpretation by (Flessa and Sepkoski, 1978). The species diversity reflected in these compilations were largely controlled by sampling vagaries, especially controlled by outcrop area and rock volume available for study (Raup, 1976b), and certain groups, intervals, and regions were and continue to be better studied than others. Furthermore, the fauna was treated in toto, rather than focusing on individual groups has been the case in neontologic work. More recent work focused on specific taxonomic groups and geologic intervals, however, has suggested otherwise. Valentine and Jablonski’s (1991) study of Pleistocene and Holocene sea-level fluctuations suggests that the rapid and substantial sealevel changes over the past 1 Myr had no effect upon diversity – the existing data show virtually no faunal differences between these sea-level highstands. McGhee (1991, 1992), based on species richness as well as evolutionary rates in Devonian brachiopod species as a response to sea-level change, concluded that sea level, as well as the rate of sea-level change, showed virtually no correlation with either variable. This pointed to a minimal control by sea level, hence changes in shelf area, in regulating benthic organisms and suggested that patterns documented in modern oceans may be a very recent phenomenon or simply fortuitous.

Keywords

Species Richness Late Cretaceous Mass Extinction Cross Plot Devonian Brachiopod 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arthur, M. A., Dean, W. E., Pollastro, R. M., Claypool, G. E. and Scholle, P. A., 1985, Comparative geochemical and mineralogical studies of two cyclic trangressive pelagic limestone units, Cretaceous Western Interior Basin, U. S., in: Fine-grained Deposits and Biofacies of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway: Evidence of Cyclic Sedimentary Processes (L. M. Pratt, E. G. Kauffman and F. B. Zelt, eds.), SEPM 1985 Midyear Meeting, Golden, CO, Fieldtrip Guidebook, 4I, pp. 16-27.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, M. A. and Sageman, B. B., 1994, Marine black shales: Depositional mechanisms and environments of ancient deposits, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 22:499-551.Google Scholar
  3. Barrera, E. and Savin, S. M., 1999, Evolution of late Campanian-Maastrichtian marine climates and oceans, in: Evolution of the Cretaceous Ocean-Climate System (E. Barrera and C. C. Johnson, eds.), Geol. Soc. Am. Sp. Pap. 332:245-282.Google Scholar
  4. Boecklen, W. J. and Gotelli, N. J., 1984, Island biogeography theory and conservation practice: species-area or specious-area relationships, Biol. Cons. 29:63-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browne, I. A. and Newell, N. D., 1966, The genus Aphanaia Koninck, 1877, Permian representative of the Inoceramidae, Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. Novitates 2252:1-10.Google Scholar
  6. Buckley, R. C., 1985, Distinguishing the effects of area and habitat type on island plant species richness by separating floristic elements and substrate types and controlling for island isolation, J. Biogeog. 12:527-535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collom, C. J., 1991, High-resolution stratigraphic and paleoenvironmental analysis of the Turonian-Coniacian stage boundary interval (Late Cretaceous) in the lower Fort Hays Limestone Member, Niobrara Formation, Colorado and New Mexico, Unpubl. MS thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo.Google Scholar
  8. Collom, C. J., 1998, Taxonomy, biostratigraphy, and phylogeny of the Upper Cretaceous bivalve Cremnoceramus (Inoceramidae) in the Western Interior of Canada and the United States, in: Bivalves: An Eon of Evolution -- Paleobiological Studies Honoring Norman D. Newell, (P.A. Johnson and J.W. Haggart, eds.), University of Calgary Press, Calgary, pp. 119-142.Google Scholar
  9. Elder, W. P., 1987a, The Cenomanian-Turonian (Cretaceous) stage boundary extinctions in the Western Interior of the United States, Unpubl. PhD diss., University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
  10. Elder, W. P., 1987b, The paleoecology of the Cenomanian-Turonian (Cretaceous) stage boundary extinction at Black Mesa, Arizona, Palaios 2:24-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elder, W. P., 1989, Molluscan extinction patterns across the Cenomanian-Turonian stage boundary in the Western Interior of the United States, Paleobio. 15:299-320.Google Scholar
  12. Elder, W. P., 1991, Mytiloides hattini n. sp.: A guide fossil for the base of the Turonian in the Western Interior of North America, J. Paleont. 65:234-241.Google Scholar
  13. Erwin, D. H., 1993, The Great Paleozoic Crisis. Life and Death in the Permian, Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Flessa, K. W. and Sepkoski, J. J., Jr., 1978, On the relationship between diversity and changes in habitable area, Paleobio. 4:359-366.Google Scholar
  15. Hancock, J. M., 1989, Sea-level changes in the British region during the Late Cretaceous, Proc. Geol. Assoc. 100:565-594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hancock, J. M. and Kauffman, E. G., 1979, The great transgressions of the Late Cretaceous, J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 136:175-186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haq, B. U., Hardenbol, J. and Vail, P. R., 1989, Mesozoic and Cenozoic chronostratigraphy and eustatic cycles, in: Sea-Level Changes: An Integrated Approach, (C.K. Wilgus, B. S. Hastings, C. G. St. C. Kendall, H. W. Posamentier, C. A. Ross, and V. C. Van Wagnoner, , eds.), SEPM Sp. Pub. 42:71-108.Google Scholar
  18. Harries, P. J., 1993, Dynamics of survival following the Cenomanian-Turonian (Upper Cretaceous) mas s extinction event, Cret. Res. 14:563-583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harries, P. J., 1999, Repopulations from Cretaceous mass extinctions: Enviromental and/or evolutionary controls, in: Evolution of the Cretaceous Ocean-Climate System, (E. Barrera and C. C. Johnson, eds.), Geol. Soc. Am. Sp. Pap. 332:345-364.Google Scholar
  20. Harries, P. J. and Kauffman, E.G., 1990, Patterns of survival and recovery following the Cenomanian-Turonian (Late Cretaceous) mass extinction in the Western Interior Basin, United States, in: Extinction Events in Earth History (E.G. Kauffman and O.H. Walliser, eds.), Lect. Notes Earth Hist. 30:277-298.Google Scholar
  21. Harries, P. J., Kauffman, E. G., and Crampton, J. S., 1996, Lower Turonian Euramerican Inoceramidae: A morphologic, taxonomic, and biostratigraphic overview, in: New Developments in Cretaceous Research Topics: Proceedings of the 4th International Cretaceous Symposium, (C. Spaeth, ed.), Mitt. Geol.-Paläont. Instit. Univ. Hamburg 77:641-671.Google Scholar
  22. Hill, J. L., Curran, P. J. and Foody, G. M., 1994, The effect of sampling on the species-area curve, Glob. Ecol. Biogeog. Lett. 4:97-106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jablonski, D., 1986, Background and mass extinctions: The alternation of macroevolutionary regimes, Science 231:129-133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jarvis, I., Carson, G. A., Cooper, M. K. E., Hart, M. B., Leary, P. N., Tocher, B. A., Horne, D., and Rosenfeld, A.., 1988, Microfossil assemblages and the Cenomanian-Turonian (Late Cretaceous) Oceanic Anoxic Event, Cret. Res. 9:3-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson, C. C. and Kauffman, E. G., 1990, Originations, radiations and extinctions of Cretaceous rudistid bivalve species in the Caribbean Province, in: Extinction Events in Earth History, (E. G. Kauffman and O. H. Walliser, eds.), Lect. Notes Earth Hist. 30:305-324.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, J. G., 1974, Extinction of perched faunas, Geology 2:479-482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kauffman, E. G., 1975, Dispersal and biostratigraphic potential of Cretaceous benthonic Bivalvia in the Western Interior, in: The Cretaceous System in the Western Interior of North America, (W. G. E. Caldwell, ed.), Geol. Assoc. Can. Sp. Pap. 13:163-194.Google Scholar
  28. Kauffman, E. G., 1977a, Systematic, biostratigraphic, and biogeographic relationships between middle Cretaceous Euramerican and North Pacific Inoceramidae, Palaeont. Soc. Jap. Sp. Pap. 21:169-212.Google Scholar
  29. Kauffman, E. G., 1977b, Upper Cretaceous cyclothems, biotas, and environments, Rock Canyon Anticline, Pueblo, Colorado, in: Cretaceous Facies, Faunas, and Paleoenvironments across the Western Interior Basin, Field Guide, (E.G. Kauffman, ed.), Mount. Geol. 13:129-152.Google Scholar
  30. Kauffman, E. G. and Caldwell, W. G. E., 1993, The Western Interior Basin in space and time, in: Evolution of the Western Interior Basin, (W. G. E. Caldwell and E. G. Kauffman, eds.), Geol. Assoc. Can. Sp. Pap. 39:1-30.Google Scholar
  31. Kauffman, E. G. and Harries, P. J., 1996, The importance of crisis progenitors in recovery from mass extinction, in: Biotic Recovery from Mass Extinction Events, (M.B. Hart, ed.), Geol. Soc. Lond. Sp. Pub. 102:15-39.Google Scholar
  32. Kauffman, E. G., Sageman, B. B., Kirkland, J. I., Elder, W. P., Harries, P. J., and Villamil, T., 1993, Molluscan biostratigraphy of the Cretaceous Western Interior Basin, North America, in: Evolution of the Western Interior Basin, (W. G. E. Caldwell and E. G. Kauffman, eds.), Geol. Assoc. Can. Sp. Pap. 39:397-434.Google Scholar
  33. Kennedy, W. J., Landman, N. H., Christensen, W. K., Cobban, W. A. and Hancock, J. M., 1998, Marine connections in North America during the late Maastrichtian; palaeogeographic and palaeobiogeographic significance of Jeletzkytes nebrascensis Zone cephalopod fauna from the Elk Butte Member of the Pierre Shale, SE South Dakota and NE Nebraska, Cret. Res. 19:745-775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kennedy, W. J., Walaszczyk, I. and Cobban, W. A., 2000, Pueblo, Colorado, USA, candidate global boundary stratotype section and point for the base of the Turonian Stage of the Cretaceous, and for the base of the middle Turonian Substage, with a revision of the Inoceramidae (Bivalvia), Acta Geol. Pol. 50:295-334.Google Scholar
  35. Komatsu, T., Saito, R. and Fürsich, F. T., 2001, Mode of occurrence and composition of bivalves of the Middle Jurassic Mitarai Formation, Tetori Group, Japan, Paleont. Res. 5:121-129.Google Scholar
  36. MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O., 1967, The Theory of Island Biogeography, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  37. McGhee, G. R., Jr., 1991, Extinction and diversification in the Devonian Brachiopoda of New York State; no correlation with sea level, Hist. Biol. 5:215-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGhee, G. R., Jr., 1992, Evolutionary biology of the Devonian Brachiopoda of New York State: no correlation with rate of change of sea level?, Lethaia 25:165-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McRoberts, C. A. and Aberhan, M., 1997, Marine diversity and sea-level changes: Numerical tests for association using Early Jurassic bivalves, Geol. Rundsch. 86:160-167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miall, A. D., 1992, Exxon global cycle chart: An event for every occasion?, Geology 20:787-790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miall, A. D., 1997, The Geology of Stratigraphic Sequences, Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  42. Newell, N. D., 1967, Revolutions in the history of life, Geol. Soc. Am. Sp. Pap. 89:63-91.Google Scholar
  43. Raup, D. M., 1976a, Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: A tabulation, Paleobiol. 2:279-288. Raup, D. M., 1976b, Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: An interpretation, Paleobiol. 2:289-297.Google Scholar
  44. Rosenzweig, M. L., 1995, Species Diversity in Space and Time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  45. Schopf, T. J. M., 1974, Permo-Triassic extinctions: Relation to sea-floor spreading, J. Geol. 82:129-143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seibertz, E., 1979, Biostratigraphie im Turon des SE-Münsterlandes und Anpassung an die internationale Gliederung aufgrund von Vergliechen mit anderen Oberkreide-Gebieten, Newsl. Strat. 8:111-123.Google Scholar
  47. Sepkoski, J. J., Jr., 1976, Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: Species-area effects, Paleobiol. 2:298-303.Google Scholar
  48. Sepkoski, J. J., Jr., 1993, Ten years in the library: New data confirm paleontological patterns, Paleobiol. 19:43-51.Google Scholar
  49. Simberloff, D., 1974, Permo-Triassic extinctions: Effects of area on biotic equilibrium, Journal of Geology, 82:267-274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vail, P. R., Mitchum, R. M., Jr., Todd, R. G., Widmier, J. M., Thompson, S., III, Sangree, J. B., and Bubb, J. N., 1977, Seismic stratigraphy and global changes in sea level, in: Seismic Stratigraphy - applications to hydrocarbon exploration, (C. E. Payton, ed.), AAPG Mem. 26:49-212.Google Scholar
  51. Valentine, J. W. and Jablonski, D., 1991, Biotic effects of sea level change; the Pleistocene test, J. Geophys. Res. B 96:6873-6878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walaszczyk, I. and Cobban, W. A., 2000, Inoceramid faunas and biostratigraphy of the Upper Turonian-Lower Coniacian of the Western Interior of the United States, Palaeont. Assoc. Sp. Pap. 64:1-118.Google Scholar
  53. Walaszczyk, I., Cobban, W. A. and Harries, P. J., 2001, Inoceramids and inoceramid biostratigraphy of the Campanian and Maastrichtian of the United States Western Interior Basin, Revue Paléobiol. Genève 20:117-234.Google Scholar
  54. Waterhouse, J.B., 1970, Permoceramus, a new inoceramid bivalve from the Permian of eastern, New Zeal. J. Geol. Geophys. 13:760-766.Google Scholar
  55. White, T.S., Witzke, B.J. and Ludvigson, G.A., 2000, Evidence for an Albian Hudson Arm connection between the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway of North America and the Labrador Sea, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 112:1342-1355.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Harries
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeologyUniversity of South FloridaTampa

Personalised recommendations