Skip to main content

Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry: Building Instructional Capacity Through Professional Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Second International Handbook of Science Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 24))

Abstract

Currently, four reviews focus on the research on students’ and teachers’ conceptions of nature of scientific knowledge, as well as approaches to improving teachers’ and students’ conceptions. The research related to students’ and teachers’ knowledge about scientific inquiry (as distinct from the ability to undertake inquiry) is quite rare. Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of nature of scientific knowledge have been important goals of science education for over 100 years. Attention to understandings about inquiry and about nature of scientific knowledge is much more recent and is primarily attributed to the National Science Education Standards and Benchmarks for Science Literacy in the USA. Rather than reiterate the research that does exist, the purpose of this chapter is to focus on the role of professional development in facilitating the desired change in students’ and teachers’ conceptions (i.e. how to help teachers to translate what they know into effective classroom practices). The existing literature reviews do not document the nature and impacts of sustained professional development in bringing about the change. This chapter focuses on several large-scale professional development approaches (i.e. teacher enhancement grant, systemic change initiative, programmatic emphases) that our group has used in Chicago. Of particular importance is the relative impacts of these different approaches and the lessons learned about the nature of the professional development that we provide. Naturally, the existing research on students’ and teachers’ conceptions, and how they are changed is briefly reviewed to provide context, but not to the point of just reiterating what has already been presented elsewhere. But, the primary focus of the chapter is on the necessary professional development provided to teachers so they can translate their knowledge into forms that are readily understood by the students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alters, B. J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers’ decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 467–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2006). Strategies and models for teachers (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1993). Preservice biology teachers’ knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year-long assessment. Science Education, 77, 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipkins, R., Barker, M., & Bolstad, R. (2005). Teaching the ‘nature of science’: Modest adaptations or radical reconceptions? International Journal of Science Education, 27, 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education [On-Line], 3(2), December. Available: http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/ejse.html

  • Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, J. S., & Ko, E. K. (2003). Views of scientific. Unpublished paper, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2004). Revising instruction to teach nature of science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching about evolution and nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharmann, L. C., & Smith, M. U. (2001). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 85, 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). It’s the nature of the beast: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 205–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., McComas, W. F., & Clough, M. P. (1997). How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to Alters. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 1101–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Norman G. Lederman or Judith S. Lederman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lederman, N.G., Lederman, J.S. (2012). Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry: Building Instructional Capacity Through Professional Development. In: Fraser, B., Tobin, K., McRobbie, C. (eds) Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics