Advertisement

Comprehensive Risk Assessment

Applying the Cultural Property Risk Analysis Model to the Canadian Museum of Nature
  • R. WallerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

Comprehensive environmental assessments of risks to the collections of the Canadian Museum of Nature were completed in 1993, 1998, and 2003. The assessments are based on comprehensive identification of specific risks within a framework of sources of hazards, called agents of deterioration, and expected frequency of risk events, ranging from continuous to less than one event per century. Between these assessments, numerous projects were undertaken to mitigate risks to collections. These activities have resulted in a significant net reduction in total risk to collections but not all changes in assessed risks relate to changes in actual risk.

Comparison of results among the three risk assessments indicates that differences result from:
  • Changes in perception of risks

  • Changes resulting from improved understanding of, or ability to quantify, risks

  • Changes to magnitudes of specific risks as a result of risk treatments

In addition to enabling priority setting for further collection care and conservation research activities, repeated risk assessment has greatly increased staff, management and governance awareness of collection care issues and of changes in risks to collections over time. The results allow estimation of the benefits of proposed risk treatments and of the expected benefit of further risk characterization.

Keywords

Specific Risk Generic Risk Risk Identification Risk Treatment Collection Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barzilai, J., 2005. Measurement and preference function modeling. International Transactions in Operational Research 12:173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boroush, M., 1998. “Understanding risk analysis.” American Chemical Society (ACS) Resources for the Future (RFF). Available at:http://www.rff.org/misc_docs/risk_book.pdf
  3. 3.
    Buchanan, M., Porter, N., Goodwin, D., MacDiarmid, S., and Knight, K. (Eds.), 1999. Guidelines for managing risk in the Australian and New Zealand public sector. HB 143:1999. Standards Association of Australia, Strathfield, Australia.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carey, J., Beilin, R., Boxshall, Burgman, M., and Flander, L., 2007. Risk-based approaches to deal with uncertainty in a data-poor system: stakeholder involvement in hazard identification for marine national parks and marine sanctuaries in Victoria. Australia. Risk Analysis 27 (1):271– 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Price, J. C., and Fitzgerald, G. R., 1996. Categories of specimens: a collection management tool. Collection Forum 12(1): 8–13.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michalski, S., 1990. An overall framework for preventive conservation and remedial conservation. In K. Grimstad (Ed.), 9th Triennial Meeting: Preprints. ICOM Committee for Conservation, Los Angeles, CA, 589–591.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waller, R. R., 1994. Conservation risk assessment: a strategy for managing resources for preventive conservation. In A. Roy and P. Smith (Eds.), Preventive Conservation Practice, Theory and Research, preprints of the contributions to the Ottawa Congress, 12–16 September 1994. The International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, London. Available at:http://www.museum-sos.org/docs/WallerOttawa1994.pdf Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Waller, R. R., 1995. Risk management applied to preventive conservation. In C. L. Rose, C. A. Hawks and H. H. Genoways (Eds.), Storage of Natural History Collections: A Preventive Conservation Approach, 21–28. Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections, Iowa City. Available at:http://www.museum-sos.org/docs/WallerSPNHC1995.pdf Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waller, R. R., 2003. Cultural Property Risk Analysis Model: Development and Application to Preventive Conservation at the Canadian Museum of Nature. Göteborg Studies in Conservation 13. Göteborg Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Göteborg.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Waller, R., and Michalski, S., 2004. Effective preservation: from reaction to prediction. Conservation, the GCI Newsletter 19(l):4–9. Available at:http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications/newsletters/19_l/feature.html Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ConservationCanadian Museum of NatureOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations